Sentences with phrase «arguments in the case on»

The Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments in the case on Tuesday morning in a session that attracted large crowds outside the court, while justices clashed inside during the proceedings.

The Supreme Court justices are scheduled to hear arguments in the case on June 4.

The supreme court heard oral arguments in the case on October 8 and is expected to rule by the end of the year.

Judge Theodore Zayner of Santa Clara Superior Court heard arguments in the case on Tuesday.

Not exact matches

Still, experts said those comments were likely to hurt the government's case in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard arguments on Tuesday night over whether the TRO should be upheld while the order's legality is established.

The eight justices, who open their 2016 - 17 term on Monday, will hear arguments on Wednesday in the case of an Illinois man, Bassam Salman, who prosecutors said made nearly $ 1.2 million trading on inside information about mergers involving clients of Citigroup Inc, where his brother - in - law worked.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a case that could have serious implications for lawsuits involving businesses overseas.

The first blockbuster case on the court's calendar is Oct. 10, when the justices will hear argument in a fight over the University of Texas» affirmative action program.

If that's the case, there is an argument that the value is zero (if you consider the very moment of its inception), but the answer could also be «hundreds of dollars» based on its value in the market that same day.

Q. On the reference case the Supreme Court of Canada is slated to hear sometime in the spring, do you plan to file arguments with the court supporting the federal government's position?

The former workers» cases hinged on their argument that the companies had violated clauses of the visa law requiring employers to show that hiring H - 1B workers «will not adversely affect the working conditions» of other workers in similar jobs.

Both sides in the Texas cases proposed on June 24 that oral arguments be heard in mid - to late - October.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund case, which addresses the preemptive scope of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA).

Using Pakistan as a case study, this article analyzes the ongoing debate and concludes that while there is merit to arguments on both sides, prudent policy recommendations for the governance of the United States» covert drone program fall somewhere in between.

Lefcourt said that the way the judge who handles Shkreli's criminal case views his public conduct could affect the judge's decision on pretrial motions and arguments, which in turn can affect Shkreli's chances of beating the charges.

The first oral arguments in the string of lawsuits filed against DOL's fiduciary rule were heard on Aug. 25 by Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

Your first stop should be the Canadian government, which has, in cases where there's a good argument, made representation on behalf of Canadian businesses who get caught in this quagmire.

Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments on Aug. 25 in the first hearing in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

Indeed, in oral arguments on Sept. 23 in the second case before Judge Daniel Crabtree in the District of Kansas, attorneys for insurer Market Synergy argued Labor failed to prove the current state - based regulation of fixed - indexed annuities is broken, and that the judge should «hit the pause» button on including them in the rule.

Amid the flurry of essays on religious liberty occasioned by the Supreme Court's hearing arguments in the Hobby Lobby case, these two sentences from Rick Warren's otherwise excellent op - ed in the Washington Post stood out to me:

She was particularly impressed by the Court's reasoning in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the 1992 case that sustained the result in Roe v. Wade while refabricating the entire constitutional argument on which it had rested.

Schäfer, who teaches English at two universities in Mainz, draws on many thinkers to make her case, but two examples can illustrate her argument.

In Lucia v. SEC, the argument centered on the question of whether administrative judges are wielding the power to settle cases decisively and issue orders, even though they are not appointed and confirmed as judges according to the form prescribed under Article III of the Constitution.

a) instead of * agreeing * that there are no contradictions, see if you can actually understand the argument being made (in this case: that there are NOT contradictions — especially since that is a widely held opinion of those on the opposite end of this debate).

While Faith continues primarily to reason for the existence of God through science, the book's salutary contribution to this reviewer's thought is the case that the moral argument is the most effective in reasoning for God's existence on university campuses.

Thinking abilities disabled... check Lobotomy performed, just in case any reasoning faculties are still active... check «GOD H8S F.AGS» T - shirt... check Armed with 2000 year old arguments for invisible old men in the sky that have been refuted on countless occasions... check

On January 20, a federal appeals court heard arguments in the highly publicized case of Kimberly Jean «Kim» Davis, county clerk of Rowan County (population 23,000) in mountainous northeastern Kentucky.

To be sure, in that case I might have to put on an argument to demonstrate that the Bible and the preacher are both deadly poisons — but I think that I finally could manage this.

Professor Behe's arguments were absolutely destroyed on public record in the Kansas evolution court case.

At the Center for Law and Religion Forum, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a podcast on last week's oral argument in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, the Contraception Mandate case.

While this last argument has a distinguished pedigree, Stark puts the case in boldest terms: «All that 18th - century philosophizing on things like individualism and liberty was coming straight out of 1,800 years of Christianity.»

The judge, whose decision in the case will be rendered sometime this fall, made occasional references during the trial to his own Presbyterian affiliation, and appeared to be bending over backward to admit every argument that had bearing on the case or that would help him to grasp the particular ways of Episcopalians.

By resting much of his case on the unproven assumption that schools in the past played the role he wishes they would play today, Hirsch detracts from his generally plausible argument that more could be done today to help children know and understand their culture.

But by the time Brandeis memorialized his arguments in his famous dissent in Olmstead v. United States, the first wiretap case, the focus on factual circumstances has disappeared, replaced by a broader appeal to constitutional «values»:

The argument is particularly devastating today, for it is addressed precisely to the deprived, to workers, to those who live in underdeveloped countries (who are in even worse case than the besieged in Jerusalem), and it is true enough on its negative side.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

In any case, the argument against Christian majoritarianism influencing public policy rests more on respect for minority feelings than on the alleged disintegration of the majority.

I'm probably beating a dead horse on this one... You're correct in that it doesn't imply the non-existece of god, but if that's the only argument / evidence for god, then your case isn't very strong.

The aim of Catholic Voices is to assist interested parties in articulating well - founded arguments supporting traditional Catholic teaching and to train participants in presenting the Church's case on contentious issues in the media.

If you exclude the additional items above, as seems to be the case in many arguments on this blog, then science is incomplete in defining the Universe / God, and their absence is the difference.

Three members of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments on Thursday (June 7) in the case of the monks of St. Joseph Abbey versus Louisiana funeral homes.

All that has been demonstrated is that on Suarez's more traditional view of substance, Leclerc can not hold such are the case, and certain non-demonstrative arguments have been given in favor of the traditional view.

And perhaps the most jolting argument on that point came in the decision that the lawyers cited from a case in New York in 1953, Kelly v. Gregory, twenty years before Roe.

And in the same way, what had to be done in the cases of same - sex marriage was a serious effort to draw on the substantive arguments, made by Robert George, Ryan Anderson, Sherif Girgis (and others of us) to explain again why the marriage of a man and woman is the most defensible form of marriage.

While sympathizing with her position on marriage, I also find Ryan Anderson's argument, that religious liberty is not in itself absolutely decisive in such a case, to be compelling.

Because of this incompleteness God's subjective immediacy does not end, despite God's always having a specific satisfaction, and that is why there is, only in God's case, no perishing, With respect to all these points my argumentation rests on the reversal of poles in God (by which an aim is possible for God which is formally independent of any concrete actual world, while Christian does not use God's reversed polar structure but uses God's everlastingness as his main argument.

His main argument is that the prehension (by God) of the «many» must, in God's case also, lead to an «increased by one» and, therefore, to a new entity («Whitehead's Novel Intuition,» Alfred North Whitehead Essays on his Philosophy, edited by George Kline [Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice - Hall, 1963], 18 - 26, at 23).

Arguments of expediency aside, the underlying issue is that the Magisterial power to pronounce authoritatively on matters of faith and - in this case more especially - morals is intrinsic to the purpose of the Church.

If, on occasion, Konstan seems to press this argument too far, bypassing a little too quickly the sense one sometimes gets that classical thinkers did have tendencies to ground friendship in utility, his argument nonetheless makes a strong case for a significant degree of overlap between ancient and modern views of friendship.

The minimalist case that there were no resurrection appearances, and in fact no post-crucifixion experiences of Jesus at all, rests on several lines of argument.