Sentences with phrase «arguments made by»

An Illinois federal court evaluates antitrust conspiracy arguments made by a broker against REALTOR ® associations and competing brokerages.

An Illinois federal court has again evaluated antitrust arguments made by a broker against REALTOR ® associations and competing brokerages.

As already mentioned, I would like to present the arguments made by both sides and I want to take a neutral stance in this whole debate.

But even for an optimist trying to explore the firmness of the market, the analysis is enough to inject some healthy skepticism into current valuations and provide some interesting fodder for the arguments made by Bill Gurley, Fred Wilson, Mark Cuban and Jason Lemkin.

There is one major misconception about transgender - related healthcare, which usually presents itself in arguments made by both politicians and health insurance companies alike: that gender reassignment surgery is not «medically necessary.»

Moreover, and ironically, you're mirroring the arguments made by anti-gay marriage advocates, for example the Knights of Columbus, that being required to provide services at gay marriages violated their religious rights because it implies that they're blessing, sanctioning or legitimizing those marriages.

What's troubling about the arguments made by Judson — and it seems to have originated in the submission of Joseph Arvay (which you find inspiring.

Response: Although we disagree with the arguments made by commenters recommending that this criterion be eliminated in the final rule, we concluded that the criterion was not directly related to ensuring the privacy rights and welfare of individuals.

In any event, it is a strange jurisprudence that looks to the arguments made by respondent to determine the breadth of the questions presented for our review by petitioner.

After all, the arguments made by the Sligo Weekender in this case were, on the basis of current law, correct.

In Coll v. BNSF Railway Company, the Court agreed with the arguments made by the plaintiff that the testimony of an expert in floor safety would be relevant in the slip - and - fall accident lawsuit that they had filed.

«While this court ordinarily restricts its discussion to the arguments made by the parties and does not address arguments of amici curiae... the argument presented by this amicus is sufficiently related to that of the [defendant] to warrant our discussion» (citations omitted).

There are two practice points to take note of from this decision: (1) even though it is not in the Rules, the Divisional Court has an «administrative practice» that counsel should be aware of that requires leave to file a reply factum, and (2) when a party is drafting their factum, they need to anticipate what the other side might say in response - unless it is a completely «new» issue raised in response, a moving party on a leave to appeal motion will not be able to respond to the particular arguments made by the other side.

916, 74 L.Ed.2 d 74, the Supreme Court considered, and rejected, the same arguments made by this defendant, but in the context of federal constitutional guarantees.

If you are up against these companies, you need an attorney you can trust, who knows the kinds of arguments made by manufacturers and how to defeat these defenses through the strategic use of evidence and expert testimony.

In a statement, Cassels Brock said that although the Court of Appeal did not accept a number of the arguments made by the firm on appeal, «we believe that we have acted appropriately and professionally in our handling of this matter, respecting our duties to our clients and acting in a manner consistent with our retainers and our clients» instructions.

Lucid procedural rules, baseless arguments made by inmates, uncontested divorces.

One of the interesting arguments made by the applicants in this case was that the activities of construction and the operation of airport infrastructure should be dissociated.

In a news release, he said the Federal Court of Appeal did not consider arguments made by Burnaby and the provincial government.

Professional witnesses can shine a new light on arguments made by the insurance company.

The court explained that a judge presiding over a summary judgment motion must consider the evidence presented and arguments made by counsel, but nothing else.

The tenor of the arguments made by the Italian government (case C - 295 / 11) was broadly similar but in addition it was argued that the authorization was contrary to the spirit of Article 118 TFEU which makes provision for the creation of the unitary patent.

In doing so, the Court turned its back on the approach it took in Marshall / Bernard, an approach that was the source of the arguments made by the governments of Canada and British Columbia in Tsilhqot» in Nation and the basis of the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in this case (William v British Columbia, 2012 BCCA 285).

In denying the Interim Suspension Order, the court cited many of the arguments made by Mr. Fenton and Mr. Martone both orally and in his opposition motion.

I'm not sure, however, that I'd be so quick to dismiss the arguments made by Pardy and Cockfield et al. (the arguments made by Conrad Black can probably be dismissed, since it consisted of little more than an unusually verbose screed).

The Court proceeds to refute a number of arguments made by the Council and the intervening Member States why the decision should be based on article 114 TFEU.

The problem, as I see it, is that when such over-generalizations are made, it is impossible to distinguish between the arguments made by those who are overtly driven by partisan interests (and don't care) and those who may be influenced by partisan interests (as we all are) but are open to controlling for those influences.

Skeptical Science This site, based in Australia, is the go - to resource for debunking specific arguments made by climate deniers.

They focus a lot of effort on disputing arguments made by Schmidt, Mann, and Rutherford (SMR) and give a lot of credit to M&M, but they give the most recognition to Smerdon and Kaplan.

Excuse the sarcasm and all the exclamation points, but these are precisely the kind of arguments made by many of the politicians that have just won power in the House.

The arguments made by those who attack science are almost always very similar.

More than anything, its incredible to me that a magazine with «science» in the title could dismiss the actual scientific arguments made by skeptics in something like two dozen words, while spending thousands of words on yet another exposition on how much money the Koch Brothers sends to the Heartland institute.

Provide a better argument to counter the arguments made by sceptics / deniers / dismissers / delayers

Identify the problems with the arguments made by sceptics / deniers / dismissers / delayers 3.

What is comical are the illogical and incorrect arguments made by the AGW deniers on this thread.

If the arguments made by contrarian scientists and the majority of the world's population can be written off as a product of screwy psychology, then so too can those made by Marshall and his cronies — and everyone else for that matter.

«This study from the regulatory authority charged with ensuring reliability bolsters arguments made by electric co-ops and others that the EPA's interim deadlines are, quite simply, not workable,» she wrote in a statement.

It is not enough for proponents of climate change policies to simply make counter scientific and economic «factual» arguments to the scientific and economic claims of the climate change policy opponents, advocates for climate policies need to help citizens understand what interests are responsible for the disinformation that is the basis for the false arguments made by opponents of climate change policies, why the tactics used the opponents of climate change policies are morally reprehensible, and why the arguments of those opposing climate change policies will continue to create huge injustices and immense suffering in the world.

Because a high percentage of the arguments made by most proponents of climate change policy have been focused on adverse climate impacts that citizens will experience where they live, while ignoring the harms to hundreds of millions of vulnerable poor people around the world that are being affected by GHG emissions from all - high emitting nations, along with claims that mainstream climate science is credible and has been undermined by morally reprehensible tactics, there is a need to make more people aware of:

The BioScience study also analyzed the arguments made by 45 science - based blogs about the impacts of global warming on polar bear populations.

We also explained that for over 30 years, proponents of action on climate change mostly focused on responding to the arguments made by opponents of climate change that government action on climate change was unjustifiable due to scientific uncertainty and high costs of proposed climate policies.

Therefore in the US, to determine the actual reasons for domestic action on climate change it is not sufficient to examine the claims of the administrative branch of government alone, one must examine the arguments made by opponents of climate change that have successfully blocked stronger climate change action by the government.

This article, the first of three in a series, proposes what NGOs, governments interested in stronger action on climate change, and citizens should do to expose the obvious and deep moral problems with the most common arguments made by opponents of climate change policies.

This series argues that NGOs, governments, and citizens should ask opponents of climate change policies questions designed to bring attention to the obvious ethical and moral problems with arguments made by opponents of climate change policies.

This series argues that NGOs, governments, and citizens should ask opponents of climate change policies questions designed to bring attention to the obvious ethical and moral problems with arguments made by opponents of climate change policies based on cost.

Susan, so it makes no difference that Wahl changed his position on agreeing with substantive arguments made by a reviewer, SteveMc, after having shared emails with Phil Jones?

That is, a person takes a position far from the position of the other side only by deciding that he doesn't trust the arguments made by the other side.

The convoluted arguments made by CO2 - based modelers to rationalize the failure to predict or reflect what is so visible to both the trained and untrained eye instigates ridicule and has weakened their credibility among both legislators and the public.

Many of the arguments made by Zycher are commonly forwarded by climate skeptics, so they are worth a close look.

It goes on to characterise the arguments made by «sceptics» and «activists» — the problem with which is that you don't like the term «activists», rather than any point of substance.