A careful definition of the word «person» is essential to understanding Hartshorne's
arguments on abortion.
Not exact matches
The organization... [will] make the
argument that... the federal courts... are the final authority
on issues important to progressives such as immigration,
abortion, gay rights, social policy, the environment and corporate power, to name a few.
When I suggested that he was grievously mistaken, he responded, as he had to Woodward's doubts about his stance
on abortion, not so much by refuting the
argument as by rebuffing the individual who had the gall to question his wisdom.
They have given us good public
arguments on embryo destruction and
abortion, all the death topics.
Furthermore, as I became more involved in the feminist conversation (some feminists are pro-life, of course, but many are pro-choice), I began to understand some of the
arguments against the criminalization of
abortion, like that banning
abortion does not necessarily reduce the
abortion rate, that enforcing a ban
on all
abortions would be impossible, and that women would likely seek out
abortions through unsafe, illegal procedures anyway.
There are
arguments that can be made
on both sides of the
abortion argument.
Different positions
on abortion can be authorized by the same theological
argument.
Personally, for instance, I would contend that deliberately induced
abortion is wrong and that that conclusion can be reached
on the basis of «utilitarian» (i.e., natural law) analysis; my
arguments, however, would not be so clear that no sincere person could reject them without being suspected of perversity.
My purpose, therefore, is not to provide a systematic critique of the book, but rather to comment
on two of its more interesting aspects, namely: (1) its
argument that the Federalists, in writing the Constitution, were actually defending the principle of the «neutral» state, and (2) its attempt to apply «neutral state» principles to the issues of
abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia.
Those who are willing to base their
argument permitting
abortions entirely
on the plurality - of - views doctrine should ask themselves questions like the following: Suppose some people thought it permissible for mothers to kill their disobedient five - year - olds (cf. Deut.
Afraid of being branded as moralists, or even worse, proselytizers, politicians cling to surface
arguments that remain in the public's comfort zone, choosing sides in the familiar debates
on school prayer, pornography, media immorality and
abortion.
A recent inquiry from a college instructor in search of philosophical
arguments on the morality of
abortion inspired us to compile the below list of resources, which, though far from comprehensive, may be of use to pro-lifers.
I think the most powerful
arguments against unrestricted legal
abortion are made by Feminists for Life, which organized in 1972 when the National Organization for Women would not reconsider its official position
on abortion.
Noonan served
on the board of the National Right to Life Committee for many years, and readers who want to see how he addressed
abortion's moral and legal dimensions should read the elegant arguments in his short book, A Private Choice: Abortion in America in the Se
abortion's moral and legal dimensions should read the elegant
arguments in his short book, A Private Choice:
Abortion in America in the Se
Abortion in America in the Seventies.
I don't care where you come down
on the
abortion argument; it's a strong, loaded word.
This lesson focuses
on John Finnis»
argument FOR
abortion and euthanasia based
on «quality of life» and goes into Peter Vardy's «stages of rationality»
argument FOR
abortion.
A GCSE or A-level lesson
on the
argument for the «Quality of Life» in relation to
abortion and euthanasia.
It looks at the Christian belief
on the subject and the
argument for and against from different churches, the Buddist view
on the subject and the impact and consequences of
abortion.
Dealing with persuasive essays
on abortion you are supposed to set a discussion and ignite an
argument among a reader, his inner world and even maybe a kind of audience.
• study the information
on abortion; • review different views
on the matter; • decide
on your particular point of view; • try to select proofs to support your opinion; • make up primary conclusions and further
argument to rise.
For example, if you are writing a research paper
on ethics of
abortions, you have to support your
arguments with evidence from secondary sources.
What we might advise you to provide as an
argument in the persuasive essay
on abortion is that sometimes destiny sets its rules and creates our life.
One distinction that the law's defenders now raise, however, is that other alternatives to partial - birth
abortion exist (see, summary in NYT article of 11/9/06, Justices Hear Argument on Late Term Ab
abortion exist (see, summary in NYT article of 11/9/06, Justices Hear
Argument on Late Term
AbortionAbortion).
The Associated Press is reporting: Now available online are articles headlined «Texas appeals court rejects treaty violation
argument» and «Judges express skepticism about
abortion law infringing
on speech.»
A three - judge panel in the 5th Circuit appellate court lifted a permanent injunction placed
on the
abortion regulations by a lower court, arguing in a written opinion that the state was likely to succeed in its legal
arguments.
The videos reignited a long - standing debate over the use of fetal tissue collected through
abortions, fueled efforts seeking to ban
abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, re-energized
arguments over whether public money should support Planned Parenthood and became the subject of a Republican - led investigation
on Capitol Hill.
Supreme Court Hears
Arguments on Most Significant
Abortion Case in 10 Years, Has Opportunity to Reaffirm Right to Safe, Legal
Abortion,, RHTP (March 2, 2016)