Not exact matches
I think that if you read the tea leaves here, the president has kicked this
argument up and away from the jobs
argument and put it down
on the carbon
side of the
discussion, and that is probably ultimately favourable to environmentalists.
Civil conversation has become uncivil
argument and hatred,
on both
sides of so many
discussions.
There are persuasive
arguments on both
sides of the question, as was evident in a public hearing that drew a contentious
discussion among a large audience
of attendees.
but in an american audience, you can't get past the titillation and gender / feminist oppression because the
argument is invalid without sex coming into a
discussion and becoming filtered
on one
side of a long standing
argument that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Following a recent
discussion on the Uber Entertainment forums around whether the use
of mods in competitive play was fair or not, we invited two Uber league players
on opposing
sides of the
argument to share their thoughts.
For other indicators — glacial retreat, sea level, arctic ice extent, etc. — the data is equally noisy, and it is difficult having a sensible
discussion without the inevitable cherry - picking
on both
sides of the
argument.
That's because the participants in the
discussion were genuine skeptics (
on both
sides of the
argument) rather than deniers!
Let's not pre-judge anyone prior to their having a chance to hear different
sides of the
discussion, but give speakers the benefit
of the doubt for having honest conviction and opinion and remaining open minded enough to consider
argument on its merits.
There can be no fair
discussion of the question
of usefulness, when an
argument so vital may be employed
on one
side, but not
on the other.
Unfortunately what I've learned is that those —
on my
side of the
argument — who are less willing to openly engage in these
discussions, may have a perfectly good reason for not doing so.
Any
discussion about life insurance as an investment after you retire is certain to draw strong opinions
on both
sides of the
argument.