Sentences with phrase «arguments over facts»

Maybe, those are not arguments over morals, those are arguments over facts.

Although there is no way of assessing whether Arsenal are indeed interested in the player, there can be no argument over the fact that Arsene Wenger needs to sign the player, or at least a player of his kind.

Not exact matches

Unfortunately, humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about whether life begins at conception, or over the proper structure of the family.

While I agree with your as.sertion that an argument for the oversimplification can be made on nearly any position, I think the previous statement is not only unreasonably over simplified, if such were definable, but is, in fact, flat out incorrect.

What is with the Christian backers of their god as soon as they are backed into a corner and they do not have a logical answer they come back well after the fact and start the same BS arguments all over again.

The fact that they are fighting over this issue and insisting that the Steel Cross be placed at the site of the museum nullifies all arguments in its favor.

In fact, some of his greatest arguments with the soldiers / governments over the years have been over this very issue — the humans are afraid and so they want to kill the aliens while he wants to encourage life and cooperation (thinking in particular of the Ninth Doctor with Harriet Jones or even the battle of Canary Wharf when we lost Rose because of Torchwood opening the breach etc.).

again, that only strengthens my point: the core teaching of the Bible is virtually unanimously affirmed by over 2 billion — a practical fact directly contrary to your argument.

It an interesting argument and I can see some of what you are saying except what with the fact that Jesus was sweating blood which certainly suggest someone agonizing over something.

Phantom arguments like: Arsene lacks tactics, Arsene is content with top four finish, Arsene is content with making money for the board, Arsene is a miser, etc, emanate from the fact that Arsenal had a trophy drought over that period.

Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team

With Arsenal taking a 4 - 1 win to Russia in the Europa League this week, even the fact that CSKA Moscow are a tougher team to face on their own turf, the feeling is that the tie is abut over, so with the Gunners also now in touching distance of Chelsea in the fifth Premier League place, there is an argument that Arsene Wenger should have one eye on our EPL game at the weekend.

Simply look at the fact the team has only shipped out 10 goals over their recent run of form (with three coming in the win over Chelsea) and you see there is an argument to be made.

I've had several arguments with hard core advocates over this, in fact — and was told that I don't know what I'm talking about, despite the fact that I have actually successfully nursed 6 children, and that all the evidence we have shows that women who are exhausted are likely to have supply problems.

But this argument ignores the fact that children often have no say over whether they are exposed to passive smoke in the car; do children not have the right to travel in a healthy environment?

Given how strange and over the top much of the testimony in this trial was, the jurors were probably unfazed by the fact that the prosecutors ended their argument by quoting a Shel Silverstein poem.

Moody's campaign often makes the argument that she's the fundraising leader — emphasis on «raising» — but there's no skirting around the fact that White's campaign account has a $ 616,205 advantage over Moody's.

At best, she casts a critical eye over arguments such as that about the role of forced intercourse in evolution, pointing to the fact that in many species the female acts as a gatekeeper to reproduction.

We had a loud argument about a month ago over the fact that a calorie is a calorie.

However, that argument is not supported by the observable facts — when trainees perform the same workout and the same number of reps every workout strength gains slow and then stop over a short period of time.

I like to listen to both sides of an argument, look at the facts (not theories) from both sides and especially look at our evolutionary history to see what kinds of foods people all over the world have eaten for thousands, and hundreds of thousands, of years that sustain optimal health.

There is no argument in the fact that Russian girls are the appeal of men from all over the world.

He was the glue holding Nadine to her family, since she and Mona are in a near - constant state of argument, as well as the fact that she's convinced her mother prefers the seemingly perfect Darian over her.

These facts, along with the reality that the federal government is barred from developing a national curricula and doesn't have much ability to force states to stick to any promises to enact college - preparatory curricula standards, belies Malkin's argument that Common Core is merely an Obama administration effort to «usurp state authority» over education policy.

Rittle - Johnson called the debate over whether kids should be taught concepts or drilled on math facts a «silly argument.»

First, it continues the impression that all e-books are indie works, when the big name publishers are in fact all over e-books and you've made arguments against how they handle e-books.

While there may be very valid arguments and concerns over how shifting the balance of power back to one major retailer can impact the entire publishing industry, the fact remains: price fixing isn't allowed because it also shifts the balance of power back to one seller.

In fact, we keep separate finances so that there's no arguments over money, because I got tired of that... back when I financially supported my first husband when HE was following HIS dream.

The fact that the number of bitcoins can reach an upper limit is an often - used argument that bitcoin will retain its value over the long - term.

Finally, your entire argument here is a tangent to evade from the fact that cloud saves is a pitiful feature to laud over anything, especially when it's not a feature unique to Steam.

Another thing is I have had two flat out arguments with managers of stores over the fact that I was wanting a PS4!

A fact that is often times lost in the arguments over video games and violence.

While debate remains over what constitutes a roguelike or whether the term should even be used, there's no argument around the fact that both developers and players have come to love these games for their endless, procedural challenges.

Therefore, it is intriguing that arguments persist that because only small accelerations are presently evident, the IPCC sea level projections must be wrong, when in fact the observations over the last 20 years agree closely with the Third Assessment Report and AR4 projections and are statistically consistently with AR5 RCP8.5 projections.

In fact, similar arguments abound — BP's justification for developing Canadian tar sands was the same as that of British politicians who argued for slavery — «otherwise, the international competition will take over / those resources are going to be developed anyway.»

In fact our real argument turned around is that we reject a model amplification of 1.2 and even 1.0 over land since that is inconsistent with the observational analysis of observed ratios of surface and lower troposphere trends.

In the interview, with Andy Balaskovitz, I described the value of having a public more attuned to how science works — that new knowledge is what's left over after peers chew on each others» data and analysis, and that argument and uncertainty are normal, that science is a journey, not a set of facts:

You say that this uncertainty is used «to argue that environmental policies based on concerns over global warming are not even worthy of support», but it seems to us that it is less the case that your objection is based on an argument made as much as the fact that they outlined a difference of opinion.

Yes, we may well be inducing climate change, but there may be — in fact, there is — a moral argument that places industrial and economic development over mitigation, in spite of its effect on the environment.

You are absolutely correct about Dentists: they are «really are not in the business of facts, so you are NEVER going to get some of them to admit defeat, they will just move on to the next discredited zombie argument and start over.»

The thing I notice is that Denialists really are not in the business of facts, so you are NEVER going to get some of them to admit defeat, they will just move on to the next discredited zombie argument and start over.

I know its way OT (and likely over all of our heads), but these types of arguments should consist of facts and dialog, not mere argument by journal association.

It was settled well over 100 years ago, and if you've been following along you have heard not one, but a half dozen arguments that are all openly endorsed by the list physicists, however enthusiastically they are challenged by people who do not, in fact, understand physics.

(We can quibble over the fact that molecules only are coming out within the upper half solid angle of the the full isotropic M - B speed distribution, or that some have escape velocity and don't fall back down, but that's inessential to the core argument.

Third, the argument here is that we have lost sight of the fact of our self - dependence over some kind of theory of natural or divine providence, leading to a form of environmental - determinism.

The fact that «skeptics» make that argument over and over and over is a stain on the noble cause of skepticism (that said, no doubt the similar claim that disagreement = «diversion» can be found on the other side of the fence).

I worry about the minute detail involved; 0.1 per decade here, an adjustment there, the arguments over statistical methods, the use of models, the fact that a global average is nonsense etc..

Craven's ingenious argument was that when it comes to global warming, the facts we fight over don't actually matter.

Arguments will certainly ensue (in fact, they already have) about the safety of the levels of 1,4 - Dioxane in these products, and we're bound to see a debate parallel to the one over arsenic in drinking water from several years ago.

You must thow over even reasonable arguments that appear to support your position, for using them will let too many facts out of the bag and loose you any thoughtful people.