Sentences with phrase «arguments someone have made»

Or, simply ask, what arguments have they made that we haven't heard?

It's what I call an «I reckon» argument: the sort of argument you'd make in a pub, after a few beers, based on information you've established from a gut feeling so strong it doesn't need any awkward details like facts getting in the way of your opinion.

To be fair, that's the same argument I've made with Amazon Echo.

Specifically, Mike engages critically with previous arguments I have made (on this site and elsewhere) that the TPP, as currently negotiated, could result in the ultimate loss of -LSB-...]

I agree that it is a good thing to stand up and be counted for ones beliefs and although we possibly have a different view on this particular issue - your coherent argument has made me think twice about my opposition to your call.

It was after I read this earlier article that I realized that my reasoned article congratulating the Kenyan Supreme Court had nullified the spurious arguments he had made in defence of John Mahama's misjudgment or lack of it: hence his vitriolic attacks on me on the 5th September 2017 feature article.

On the other side, the Remainers have prepared some questions for Boris to answer about some of the pro-EU arguments he has made in the past.

He criticized Yang for rehashing arguments he had made in the 1970s against building the BECP.

Dr. Tennenbaum also initiated an unsuccessful professional grievance in Ohio against this author because he objected to a closing argument she had made in her role as attorney for one of the parties in the case.

This is an argument I've made several times — here, for example — but here I'm going to flesh out how Carney frames it.

The need to diversify strategies and not just asset classes is also an argument I have made frequently on Scott's Investments.

Deneen repeated many of the arguments he has made in other articles and posts e.g. Lockeanism ='s Progressivism.

Clarity about our failure need not entail giving up on the arguments we've made.

When Tom Derr made him a gift of my book, Richard twitted me in print for an argument I had made about the logic of «supererogatory acts,» acts beyond the call of duty.

I think it fair to say that at no point in these years have I received a single adequate reply to the arguments I have made against the Lib Dem policy.

It's an argument some have made for years given the mayor's office has significantly more power than the City Council.

What you'll find is that the issues I'm talking about in this campaign reflect the arguments I've made in my reporting and my columns.

When asked for the argument he would make to get more support in Congress, he said he would work across party lines to build coalitions.

It makes a lot of points whose truth I acknowledge, but doesn't address any of the arguments I've made, and certainly doesn't support the conclusion that there is no benefit from dietary carbohydrate.

Substituting race for class in such an argument would make it perilously near to the views that were attributed to Charles Murray and Richard Hernnstein in their controversial book The Bell Curve.

Yep, I've already been blocked, not for breaching their community guidelines mind you, but because I kept on doing that mansplaining thing, where you hold them to the things they've said & the arguments they've made, when those arguments have backfired and made them look foolish & they are stuck defending something they know to be indefensible.

Stick to the point and present only such information, which can either prove or disapprove the argument you have made.

And in answer to the argument some have made that a broad interpretation of the MBTA could lead to such absurd results as convictions for bird deaths caused by automobiles, airplanes, and plate glass windows, the Moon Lake court pointed out that to obtain a guilty verdict, the government must prove proximate causation.

This doesn't make all that much sense to me, though I can see how to some people this argument would make logical sense.

If we had Uncharted on Xbone and it had 1080p multiplayer then your argument would make sense.

At least that's the argument I would make.

Perhaps next time you could post something relevant to the arguments I have made and suggest why there is real reason for Nova for discard inconvenient data.

This argument would make sense only if variations in ocean heat content alone rather than the sum of both the variation in OHC and of latent heat from ice melt were indicative of AGW (i.e. indicative of heat gained from an externally forced TOA imbalance).

Those arguments would make sense in a world in which only narrow design patents are granted.