Sentences with phrase «arguments which»

Most often couples trigger each other into repetitive, cyclical arguments which end up in anger, resentment, distance and........

The first thing to be said is that the Tribunal has given careful consideration to this issue and the arguments which have been placed before it.

Arguments which focus on venting resentments rather than problem solving are of no benefit to children, but parents can teach their kids appropriate forms of conflict resolution by h...

This diffuses the situation and prevents the build up of contempt which often happens as a result of repeated arguments which are never resolved.

Just like arguments which suggest Bitcoin is centralized, Ripple also faces such criticisms.

Interestingly, none of the above comments is attributed to Goody; her methods seemed rather different, varying from telling Shetty that other housemates did not like her, and getting right into Shetty's personal space, to having aggressive loud and frequently drunken arguments which, to her credit, Shetty fended off without descending to Goody's level.

To this background he can add huge experience in court room skills including cross examination in criminal work and the attractive presentation of legal arguments which equips him to provide a service second to none.

This is generally presumed to be an equal share of the net value of all matrimonial property, although there are some exceptions and arguments which may be tendered to attempt to achieve an unequal division of the matrimonial property.

In addition to these statutes which could govern the ownership and distribution of property, there are other arguments which parties could make if the statutes didn't apply for some reason.

As a result, we are better advocates for our clients because we are better able to anticipate the arguments which will be relied upon.

«In judicial review proceedings he is an outstanding barrister — he has good arguments which he marshals clearly, eloquently and articulately» Chambers & Partners

These cases illustrate the arguments which can be deployed to attack decisions to cut funding in adult social services, and the traps which local authorities need to avoid to make such decisions lawfully.

But whenever it seems likely that the child's views and interests may not be properly presented to the court, and in particular where there are legal arguments which the adult parties are not putting forward, then the child should be separately represented.»

Such terms provide room for argument as to whether or not the obligation has been complied with, arguments which in practice complainants may end up losing given the power imbalance between often vulnerable complainants and the large organisations with which they are in dispute.

41 As regards, more particularly, the applicant's argument that the Board of Appeal failed to respond to two specific arguments which it had put forward during the procedure before OHIM, the following points should be made.

And it goes to the very limits of its logic, by questioning whether even an appropriate amendment of the Treaty would make it possible to overcome the arguments which prevent regulatory powers from being conferred on agencies or whether there are, in other words, underlying principles in Community law that are not susceptible of constitutional amendment, which can not be reconciled with recognition of regulatory powers in the hands of bodies other than the three institutions.

In his opinion presented last Thursday, Advocate General Cruz Villalon suggests the Court should say no — based on somewhat conventional, yet interesting arguments which use the rules of interpretation of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in a very selective way.

First, we obtain and analyze all evidence against you to evaluate the case and clarify the legal arguments which will permit you to successfully contest.

They do this by repeating arguments which presuppose that copyright is a natural right of authors (not mentioning that authors almost always cede it to publishers).

The default position in Scots law is equal or 50/50 sharing though there are a number of arguments which are sometimes used to procure a different outcome.

The defendant actually showed a high degree of competence in his arguments which were deemed in fact to be successful arguments.

While she notes that the «purpose of the revision of the former fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC by the present fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU was undoubtedly to strengthen individual legal protection by extending the legal remedies available to natural and legal persons against European Union acts of general application» (para. 33), she nevertheless continues by making three arguments which underline the General Court's interpretation of what regulatory acts entail.

The real problem is that Steig has been deliberately misrepresenting himself in his public criticism of the paper, criticizing arguments which he made as a reviewer, and pretending that this was his first opportunity to look at the calculations in ODonnell et al..

They'll come with a bag of well honed arguments which will sound like science and which will only be effectively debunked by someone with a firm grasp of the science.

As I have said before, I am merely asking questions and making arguments which I hope will help elucidate your argument and from which I may learn something.

he has commented on other skeptical arguments which he accepts.

In any case, your entire post seems to be a collection of straw man arguments which directly contradict things I've already said (like the cooling the PDO can cause).

Cranks characteristically dismiss all evidence or arguments which contradict their own unconventional beliefs, making rational debate a futile task, and rendering them impervious to facts, evidence, and rational inference.

Koonin does not do that directly, for then he'd have to show that beyond these feelings there are arguments which rely on projections.

Monbiot, and many like him do not trust corporations, do not trust the governments which seemingly regulate them, and do not trust scientists when they produce arguments which coincide with commercial interests.

James Delingpole makes the point very clearly at the end of the entry on «Global Warming» in his book How to be Right: «if the climate change doom mongers are really so sure all the evidence is on their side, why are they so keen to stifle any arguments which threaten to prove them wrong?»

If they [the hostile reviewers] make arguments which are invalid you show that they are invalid and go on if their arguments are valid you amend your theory.

This seems to be in the same vein as other books I've read that try to debunk a theory through name calling and setting up easy to defeat arguments which they attribute to their foe to prove the validity of their opinions.

This topic is enormously practically important because nations and others who argue against proposed climate change policies usually rely on various economic arguments which often completely ignore the ethical and justice limitations of these arguments (In the case of the United States, see Brown, 2012.)

When you throw away the chaff of all the fallacious arguments and try to distill the climate science advocated by the IPCC and alike, you find that there are actually two arguments which appear as legitimate scientific arguments, but unfortunately don't hold water.

Rather the actual basis for current US climate policies includes arguments which have successfully prevented the US Congress from passing more ambitious US climate change policies.

This blog is concerned more with the political and moral arguments which putatively emerge from climate science.

In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.

But as I am always been interested in science, I have difficulties if someone tries to convince others with arguments which are at least discutable.

Arguments which depend on overturning standard physics, e.g. disproving quantum mechanics, are not interesting until such time as a significant part of the physics world has accepted that there is some merit to them.

And to find the arguments which debunk it, and are sceptical of it, you don't have to seek out some dark, nasty, politically - motivated organisation.

Without admitting defeat, Levant quickly realized that he was going to have to find a different way to spin the dirty oil apart from economic arguments which just weren't resonating with people.

I made it clear, by including the phrase «note carefully, that I do not so argue» that I disassociated myself from the sort of political arguments which could still «win».

That is why I said in a previous post to my yahoo group members: Old articles and arguments which are obviously not valid now should not be posted to these groups.

As such, this is one of the arguments which supports higher climate sensitivity — in the 3C per doubling of CO2 range, although «per doubling of CO2» is just a metric, but it really means «3C per forcing equivalent to a doubling of CO2» (because, as this example shows, the initial forcing can be something totally unrelated to CO2).

What most people seem to forget here, is that on one hand there are fundamental thermodynamical arguments which demand that hurricane intensity increase over time, while on the other hand, there are these two big chunks of ice sitting in both polar regions, which will counteract the warming process in their own special way.

The scientist then could easily dissect any of the arguments which the sceptics are spreading now.

You can even buy arguments which enhance the agent's hacking abilities or strength.

The author is very reasonable unlike your arguments which references no facts whatsoever and comes off as desperate denial.

Therefore to continue the claim you'll need use new legal arguments which involves amending your claim.