Sentences with phrase «arguments with real»

In your letter, you need to convince the reader that you are the best candidate for event manager position by providing them with supporting arguments with real - life examples of your achievements.

If you had any arguments with real force, you wouldn't need to resort to this sort of behaviour.

Hence the agressiveness with which certain people in the US pursue seemingly inconsequential semantic arguments with no real point.

The answer is for the left to win arguments with real people and stop is time honoured Fabian strategy of, manipulating the system to vastly exaggerate the power held by a small minority whilst simultaneously complaining about their inability to concentrate even more power with Left Liberal courtiers via PR What the left hate and what they can not admit is that their leaders despise the views of many of their voters, perhaps a majority.

It's a circular argument with no real beginning or ending... «I am great»... «Why»... «Because I said so.»

Not exact matches

The essence of Chamorro - Premuzic's argument is that, a few very technical situations aside (and if you're involved in those, insufficient IQ probably isn't a major concern of yours), more real - world problems get solved with people skills than raw intelligence.

«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»

That being said, while I understand your argument about creating a product that would produce $ 20k a year in passive income, I don't think it is the fairest comparison with real estate the way it is described.

The irony being that he was threatened by the church for going against the whole «god did it» argument, which is what this guy was trying to claim, and has nothing to do with «real science»

In the real world, we define fallacies for debate purposes and validating arguments which is not happening here in the forums with hateful trolls like you.

Stop playing the victim card and come up with a real argument for your position.

Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.

(11) The real argument, however, was not so much with tradition as with a church which used tradition authoritatively.

Finally, the Hitler argument («he began with gun control») not only is historically inaccurate; it elicits real fear with a false metaphor.

Frank, one assumes, would quarrel with this way of putting his argument, but he offers no alternative explanation for how millions of middle Americans are so blind to their real interests and so self - destructive in their political behavior.

We will be overwhelmed with beautiful reality, tears falling down our face, all arguments and timelines and histories and opinions and theologies cast down to roll away to the corners because their insufficiency to fully see and understand and touch the clarity of God; the in - breaking of the light; the sight of the Real is when we fully and finally realize just how insufficient the whispers of this Love have been.

Instead of big arguments and point - by - point apologetics, instead of reacting to slights, imagined or legitimate, political or religious or relational, I long to get on with my Father's business, to live into freedom in my real walking - around life, and I pray there's an invitation in there somewhere.

My third argument is that all these economic considerations fail to deal with the real needs of people.

The argument from critics is that giving Jones airtime can give his conspiracies a chance to enter the minds of viewers and get confused with real information over time.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

But because neither side has been able to buttress its arguments with solid facts, the controversy has been clouded by charges and countercharges made all the more strident by the lack of real information.

The problem with such an argument is that while it offers a very helpful insight into the question of why we suffer and endure hardship, it says nothing about real evil.

Smith went on to suggest that the real argument Jews have is not with him but with the New Testament.

In the academy, where argument can so easily turn into a competitive sport, we momentarily bucked that trend with real conversations about real people.

some of your posts have been straw men arguments against total depravity that are real easy for you knock down and in reality the text has nothing to do with inability and no Calvinist believes it either

I have no problem with you all attacking me of him or Riley or any other Christian IF you have done your own homework first and have a real argument that supports your case.

If you actually want to discuss topics with real arguments, I'll be happy to stop insulting you and prove you wrong with logical arguments, anyplace, anytime.

He worried that arguments which had been going on between Luther and the Law Faculty, and with himself, were the real cause.

At the core, the real argument has to do with the nature of man.

Good answers in return of this difficulty with real arguments and telling the whole thing on the topic of that.

as much as I hate arsene, that was very childish and classless, their are more classy ways to hurt arsene, I can't believe fans are fist fighting, PEOPLE WE ARE BROTHERS AND SISTERS, let's attack the real enemy, whilst we lash out and pummel each other, those rich fat snobs (arsene included) laugh there way to the bank, let's show them who owns the club, abandon that stadium and they'll be holding emergency meetings with arsenal care group on how to fix the problem, we'll have them eating out of our hands, verbal arguments are fine, I never badmouth arsene or arsenal in front of a chelsea supporters but when I'm with a gooner I vent my frustration and that's perfectly fine, that's why this website exists.........

I think this is really an argument about the experiments, with only tangential relation to the real - world phenomenon nominally being tested.

And am sick of the he needs game time after injury argument... He's been match ready for two months or more and should be willing and able to prove he is a first team contender... instead each time he appears it's the jogging around plus the ocassional darting run on display again along with the demonstrated ability not to be able to dribble with the ball the failure to give real defensive support to full back and the persistent fragility in front of goal... Should be part of a buy one get one free package with wenger

This is the most silly argument one can come up with in the real world.

Whenever people disagree with eachother on here the «FIFA isn't the real world» argument is used.

Heyman has now placed himself within Category 3, and the first thing I'm going to say is that there are some real problems with the Category 3 argument.

Your argument can still be used for the defending case, i.e. «this is Real we are talking about, with Ronaldo, Asensio, Vasquez, up front, supported by Kroos and Kovacic».

No matter the arguments, it is ridiculous to place Celtic and even Liverpool in the same league with Barcelona and Real and Inter and AC Milan not to mention putting Liverpool ahead of Barca.

Warner at The New York Times understands the real argument here is about women who feel put - upon by all the expectations associated with modern motherhood.

St. Michael, MN — In the wake of the latest argument with her children, a local mom was completely blown away when she learned that her kids think she is a real asshole.

They found themselves in the wonderland of Labour Party policy making, the real world would barely encroach, many policy arguments would take place with no regard for recognisable logic and most processes were strange and absurd.

Prosecutors made their closing arguments Monday in the public corruption case against Sheldon Silver, the former state Assembly speaker with extremely close ties to the real estate industry.

************** Funny, it sounds rather liek the arguments the Right uses to implement the laws designed to prevent voter fraud: Laws designed to correct a non-existant problem, except that racial discrimination is very real --- well if it is «very real» you and the leftist democrats should have no problem with offering concrete evidence of it.

We have no real idea what the atmosphere of Proxima b is made of, but for the sake of argument the researchers tried out an atmosphere like Earth's as well as a simpler one — mostly nitrogen with a dash of carbon dioxide.

While we can make assumptions and predictions based on other similar diets, the real judgment made with scientific arguments and based on evidence can not be given as of yet.

Faѕtidioᥙs replies in return of this issue with real arguments ɑnd describing the whole thing on the topіc of that.

Good answers in return of this question with real arguments and telling everything on the topic of that.

The sort of problem Sontag has with Jameson is, of course, the very argument Bordwell has with anyone from Slavoj Žižek to Jacques Lacan, evident in a comment he makes on his blog (but not in the book) that echoes directly Sontag's: «Most of FRT [Zizek's The Fright of Real Tears] offers standard film criticism, providing impressionistic readings of various [Krzysztof] Kieslowski films in regard to recurring themes, visual motifs, dramatic structures, borrowed philosophical concepts, and the like.»

During the film's climax, which sees Wiley taking on the vaunted Harvard debate team (in real life, this never happened — they did battle wits with USC however), the content of the arguments, while discussing weighty issues, barely passes for interesting public discourse.

The other argument, perhaps resonating with a larger audience, is that her methodology lacks real content, has no reference to any knowledge that should be learned.