Sentences with phrase «arguments you would like»

justpro86 The possible infinite quality of time is not something that can just be debated into solution as the Kalam argument would like to.

This is why he says that his book, written for a lay audience, inevitably contains «only a shadow of the argument I would like to make».

Before you start custom essay writing, think about your topic, write down all ideas or arguments you would like to mention in your paper.

Here's the argument I'd like to make to Apple.

Not exact matches

Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.

«Even the very first day we got into — not an argument — but he's like, «Well what would you do in this case?»

Like its car adapter, Anker's wall charger has two USB ports, which will stop any recurring arguments over who gets to charge their gadgets first.

Their argument goes like this: once North Koreans encounter information from the outside world, they will know their despotic government has been lying to them.

«But clients look at their statements and say, «I appreciate your arguments, but I'd really like to make some money.

So while a firm like NEA may not have a woman at the table when the big decisions are being made, there is an argument that it can afford the infrastructure needed to stem bad behavior, both at its portfolio companies and within its own ranks.

If you have an investment thesis you like, run it by people who support the other side of the argument.

One of the default arguments why he wouldn't want to enter government is that it might feel like a step down, given Facebook's global reach and quasi-monopoly on the distribution of information.

A few of the arguments, like how the long lineups provide fans an opportunity to talk movies with their fellow attendees, made sense even though I wouldn't consider them a worthy tradeoff for all the other issues.

Treating family and friends just like one would any other kind of serious investor can head off arguments later.

Many of the outlets that have given up on comments make the same arguments about why they did so, and one of the main ones is that social - media platforms like Twitter (twtr) and Facebook (fb) make comments unnecessary.

The bloated valuation has attracted short sellers, though their arguments sound a lot like those voiced in Canada three years ago.

«The ability to have folks who can speak that language, help develop arguments and make that case is a helpful approach for a company like AWS to be able to sell their services,» Alexander says.

While I truly want to be with you on the hands - off - free - market argument, I just have to believe that these rules are in place for good reasons... like making sure your sweet Granny don't get fleeced by a huckster.

But Mnuchin extends that argument about transparency into something more like a rap sheet: take Beijing's money, he warns, and risk being trapped in a debilitating cycle of debt — something that has led to asset - stripping by Chinese practitioners of what the National Defense Strategy calls «predatory economics.»

Like other loopholes in gun laws, these have been in large part buttressed by the typical pro-gun argument that people should have these weapons to be able to defend themselves and their families.

Analysts who retain sympathy for the gold standard, like self - confessed «gold bug» John Mauldin, have always understood that the main argument in favor of gold is that it imposes an unbreakable trade and capital flow discipline — indeed that is also the main argument against gold — but many of them have tended to de-emphasize reserve currency economics mainly, I think, because this particular problem is to them subsumed under their more general concerns about money.

With that said, I would like to play the devil's advocate for a second vis - à - vis your arguments regarding actual GDP growth and the overall productivity of investment.

The «stock accumulation» line refers to a toehold position that Simon has accumulated in Macerich; people like to complain about toeholds these days, but I have never heard a serious argument that they might be illegal.

And all along, investors bought the argument: Even if the number of pay TV subscribers had stalled, the big media companies seemed as though they were going to wring more money out of the customers they did have — and could sell more stuff to Web TV entrants like Netflix and Amazon.

J.Hohn, your argument applies for manufacturing industries that use natural resources, or perhaps natural resources like wind turbines and drone peat afforestation that have room to be scaled.

There is a strong legal argument for why some of the tokens that have come after BTC are not securities, but many other tokens that have popped up over the past 18 months look more like a security as defined by the Howey Test.

The key argument of leading «salt water» Keynesian economists like Paul Krugman, Joe Stiglitz and Larry Summers is that governments can and should drive faster growth through deficit financed public infrastructure investment, which would boost short - term growth and also raise productivity and longer term growth prospects.

While this sounds like monetary madness, it should be remembered that Ben Bernanke, former Chair of the US Federal Reserve, urged such action on the Japanese government a decade ago to deal with that country's deflationary crisis, and referenced Milton Friedman's argument that a central bank financed stimulus via a «helicopter drop» of money could have saved the United States from the Great Depression.

So if U.S. conservatives want to make the argument that decades of socialized medicine have made Britain's elites too willing to pull the plug on Alfie, they must also confront the possibility that decades of socialized medicine have made them too willing to tolerate the torture of children like Alfie.

For the defender of the emergency fund, if the argument has to do with risk mitigation we agree that an (almost) all equity portfolio like ours might too risky.

I'd like to get rid of a few of these arguments quickly.

Anytime a Christian uses the «Trump is like King David» argument, I know that they have never opened a Bible in their lives.

Lou Mercer: Or we're always taught the market does not like uncertainty, but you can make an argument that since the election, we've been more uncertain than ever.

arguments for the supposed fine tuning of the universe are like stating «ha!

I'm not trying to sound like everything is relative, but I am saying these are issues that have been debated for thousands of years, and the arguments on both sides of the coin are really strong.

Some, like Yoram Hazony in his» Biblical Case for Limited Government,» have even offered sophisticated (if in the end limited) arguments for why a restricted role for government is itself a Judeo - Christian value.

It would probably help to make you look more like a person who is literate in the English language and thus is capable of presenting a coherent argument.

Dr. Craig, while intelligent and very eloquent, is a second - rate philosopher with fallacy - riddled, tired, hackneyed, oft - repeated arguments and your Craig nutt - hugging (I don't think Jesus would like that Chad, kinda gay) just shows how limited your cognitive abilities really are.

A bigger problem is that cynical pols like Romney (and Michelle Bachmann on this issue) end up feeding into this self - defeating narrative because it seems easier than making a real argument about health care or taxes or what have you.

Throughout you have twisted and confused the definitions of words like religion, belief, faith, Agnostic and Atheist with faulty logic and broken arguments.

... well the same logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.

But is does seem like this policy is being advocated by some reasonable - sounding people with plausible arguments and it does seem to have a respectable intellectual roots.

I would like to point out that those from both sides of the argument on belief have one similarity... the lack of tolerance.

You said, «I would like to see ANY evidence to support your argument that there's no God.

I would like to see ANY evidence to support your argument that there's no God.

your immature, irrational and absolute blind remarks toward atheism have been proved that there is no rational argument beyond this point, I suggest you read my post to the fullest and absorb it's meaning, and continue to act like a civilized being, your behavior is not acceptable in any rational debate, you are not making yourself look good.

@Liz — It seems like the argument you are making is valid but only from the perspective of either creating a high risk of complication / retardation which science has proven when children are born to closely related people, and the «Ick» factor of not wanting to imagine two siblings getting it on.

like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had debate, argument, sadness, hilarity... even had someone with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to make any rules... that would almost be like copping out of relationship.

Every debate Craig has had with an atheist «philosopher» or «thinker» has looked more like a learned professor trying mightily to explain basic arguments to a freshman with ADD... you know, the kind the sits in the back and only raises their hand to drop a line they remember from last night's Jon Stewart show?

Also, would you like to give me your best argument for there being a god?