Some scientists suggest that these differences
arise from ideology rather than scientific disagreements.
Not exact matches
In an editorial provocatively titled «Against Human Rights,» he argues that the concept of human rights has become an
ideology that functions, at least in the West, as «an enemy of the responsible exercise of freedom,» indeed a «patron of negative freedom, pushing against demands and obligations
arising from our shared culture.»
As an
ideology, it has become a patron of negative freedom, pushing against demands and obligations
arising from our shared culture.
Of particular importance to Gramsci is a religion or
ideology that can provide a «national - popular collective will» such as he saw in Protestantism in the Reformation or Jacobinism in the French Revolution.7 For him the particular problem of Italy
arose from the fact that the Renaissance was not in this respect the equivalent of the Reformation nor was the Risorgimento the equivalent of the French Revolution.
It
arises from the very
ideology they prescribe to.
What is interesting in this fray is that, in my experience, this is the only time that a publicly significant
ideology has
arisen from the science (or rather its practitioners), and the politics has followed.