Sentences with phrase «arises from an arbitration»

Dec. 6, 2017) The case arises from an arbitration award won by Leidos, Inc. against the Hellenic Republic resulting from security work in the 2004...

Moreover, the waiver of immunity contended for was an implied waiver, said to arise from the arbitration agreement itself where it was agreed that the Award was to be «binding on the parties» and included a provision that the parties undertook «to carry out any Award without delay and should be deemed to have waived their right to any form or recourse insofar as such waiver can validly be made».

Not exact matches

Subject to the arbitration provisions above, and other than small claims actions as permitted therein, any action or proceeding arising from, relating to or in connection with these Terms of Service will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in New York, New York, and you irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts and agree that it is a convenient forum and that you will not seek to transfer such action or proceeding to any other forum or jurisdiction, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens or otherwise.

We take no responsibility and assume no liability for any claim, action, petition, demand for arbitration or lawsuit alleging injury or damage resulting from any use of TWIST, whether arising in tort or contract, law or equity;

26.1 Regardless of any statute of limitations or law to the contrary, and to maximum extent permitted by applicable law, any Dispute arising out of or related to the Services or this Agreement must be filed within six (6) months after the date in which the incident giving rise to the Dispute occurred; provided that, if the substantive law applicable to the arbitration prohibits the parties from agreeing to this limitations period, then the limitations period under the applicable substantive law shall control.

You and Velocity Micro agree that any claim, dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable claims («Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code of Procedure then in effect.

If either you or we choose or elect arbitration of any claim, dispute, or controversy, (which may be without the other's consent), any claim, dispute or controversy by either you or us against the other (or against the employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, beneficiaries, agents or assigns of the other) arising from or relating in any way to your Account, transactions on your Account, our relationship, this Agreement or any provisions of this Agreement, any prior Agreement, any disclosures, advertising, or application (hereafter «Claim» or «Claims»), including Claims regarding the applicability or validity of this arbitration clause, shall be resolved exclusively and finally by binding arbitration.

Except as expressly provided herein, any claim, dispute or controversy (whether based upon contract; tort, intentional or otherwise; constitution; statute; common law; or equity and whether pre-existing, present or future), including initial claims, counter-claims, cross-claims and thirdparty claims, arising from or relating to (i) the Card; (ii) any service relating to the Card; (iii) the marketing of the Card; (iv) this Cardholder Agreement, including the validity, enforceability, interpretation, scope, or application of the Agreement and this arbitration provision (except for the prohibition on class or other non-individual claims, which shall be for a court to decide); and (v) any other agreement or instrument relating to the Card or any such service («Claim») shall be decided, upon the election of you or the Bank (or Green Dot Corporation or the Bank's agents, employees, successors, representatives, affiliated companies, or assigns), by binding arbitration pursuant to this arbitration provision and the applicable rules and procedures of the arbitration administrator in effect at the time the Claim is filed.

Binding Arbitration: ANY CLAIM, DISPUTE, OR CONTROVERSY (WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, WHETHER PREEXISTING, PRESENT OR FUTURE, AND INCLUDING STATUTORY, COMMON LAW, INTENTIONAL TORT AND EQUITABLE CLAIMS) BETWEEN CLIENT AND Mulcoy Travel, its respective agents, employees, principals, successors, assigns, or affiliates arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA) under its Code of Procedure then in effect.

d. Exceptions to Negotiations and Arbitration - You and Digital Extremes agree that the following Disputes are not subject to the above provisions concerning informal negotiations and binding arbitration: (1) any Disputes seeking to enforce or protect, or concerning the validity of, any of your or DE's intellectual property rights; (2) any Dispute related to, or arising from, allegations of theft, piracy, invasion of privacy or unauthorized use; and (3) any claim for injunctive relief.

At Company's sole discretion, it may require you to submit any disputes arising from the use of these Terms of Use or the Website, including disputes arising from or concerning their interpretation, violation, invalidity, non-performance, or termination, to final and binding arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of the American Arbitration Association applying California law.

W Limited v. M Sdn Bhd arose from a London Court of International Arbitration proceeding where, shortly after Mr. Haigh's appointment, the parent company of the claimant in the arbitration acquired a company that was a client of Mr. Haigh's law firm.

The statement reflects a decade or more of academic discussion of investment treaty arbitration and it is very encouraging to see the court recognize the point, from which many other issues arise regarding the transfer from of the final authority to determine the legal boundaries of sovereign authority from courts to arbitrators.

It arises from the agreement of the parties, and any applicable Rules or arbitration statute.

Representing an Asian oil major in a US$ 500 million UNCITRAL arbitration, seated in Singapore and administered by the SIAC, arising from a dispute with a contractor, in connection with a pipeline construction project in Indonesia.

Representing a global marine engineering company in a US$ 150 million ICC arbitration, seated in Singapore, and arising from a dispute over a joint venture.

Representing an Asian contractor in a US$ 1.4 billion ICC arbitration concerning a dispute with a state petroleum company arising from the refurbishment and expansion of an oil refinery and pipelines.

Acting for the Receivers of a Singapore company in litigation in the UK, arising from a Pakistani construction project and related LCIA arbitration proceedings;

Advising on a major negligence claim arising from the extensive refurbishment of a parliamentary building involving two sets of arbitration proceedings and had been settled following two days of mediation.

Advising professional services firms, manufacturers and media companies in commercial arbitrations and civil litigation arising from claims of fraud, breach of contract, malpractice, veil piercing and patent infringement.

Advising on a major negligence claim arising from the extensive refurbishment of a parliamentary building involving two sets of arbitration proceedings and settled following two days of mediation.

Professional services and private equity firms, manufacturers and media companies call upon Tim's knowledge and experience in commercial arbitrations and civil litigation arising from claims of fraud, breach of contract, malpractice and veil piercing.

49 (1) Despite the arbitration provision in a collective agreement or deemed to be included in a collective agreement under section 48, a party to a collective agreement may request the Minister to refer to a single arbitrator, to be appointed by the Minister, any difference between the parties to the collective agreement arising from the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of the agreement, including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.

One of Uber's almost - entirely redacted court filings claims that the investigation arose from security concerns about the lawsuit targeting Uber's CEO rather than Uber itself, a tactic that skirted Uber's otherwise ironclad arbitration agreement.

The shipowners contended that the insurers» claim — arising as a result of rights of subrogation from the charterers of the vessel, who also owned the jetty — fell within the arbitration provision contained in the charterparty.

Represented Russian energy company in English law, London seat LCIA arbitration arising from an attempted multi-billion dollar merger with another energy company

Represented offshore mutual insurance company in a London arbitration concerning a claim for $ 100 million arising from a business interruption in a Canadian Oil refinery.

We help clients in gaining approvals for transactions, domestic and international investigations, regulatory enforcement proceedings and civil and criminal litigation, authorizations and arbitration arising from breaches of applicable legal, regulatory, antitrust and compliance requirements and investigations before all financial regulatory agencies.

Successfully represented an international insurer in an international arbitration against a Venezuelan construction contractor and a Russian shipping company arising from vessels crashing into a pier at a chemical tank facility, resulting in millions of dollars in property damage and business interruption losses to the main pier in Puerto Cabello, Venezuela.

Served as trial or arbitration counsel in a variety of commercial matters, including a cases involving the voiding of a million - dollar note, a breach of contract case relating to a multi-million dollar insurance coverage dispute arising from a catastrophic loss, and a shareholder dispute centering on the interpretation of ten complex operating, management, business, and employment / non-compete agreements.

Represented corporate insured in $ 100 million dispute arising from hurricane losses subject to ad hoc arbitration in London under New York law

277.41 A collective agreement between a board and a designated bargaining agent for a teachers» bargaining unit may provide for the final and binding settlement by arbitration, without stoppage of work, of all differences between the parties arising from the interpretation, application, administration or alleged violation of this Part or any regulation, guideline, rule or policy under it, including any question as to whether a matter is arbitrable.

The successful representation of a software developer in a three - week commercial arbitration proceeding arising from the installation of an multi-million dollar, enterprise - wide software system at a major insurance company;

An arbitration clause in a construction contract can take many forms, from a simple statement that the parties agree to refer any dispute arising between them to arbitration, to a detailed clause containing not only the agreement of the parties to arbitrate disputes, but also setting out how the arbitrator is to be appointed and the procedures to be used by the parties in the process.

We have a proven track record of advising and representing clients in institutional and ad hoc arbitrations arising from a range of commercial transactions and investor - state disputes.

The award arose from an attritional ICC arbitration that had commenced in 2008.

Advising the Republic of Albania in international arbitration under the ICC Rules (seat Paris) concerning claims arising from energy concession contracts and infrastructure projects involving hydroelectric development.

Advising a South Korean defence and infrastructure group in respect of claims in ad hoc international arbitration (seat Oman) arising from the construction of a water treatment plant in the Middle East.

Advising América Móvil in its ICSID additional facility arbitration against Colombia under the Mexico - Colombia free trade agreement, arising from measures taken against its subsidiary, Comcel, the largest telecommunications provider in the country.

Advising US and Bermuda excess professional liability insurers in international arbitration proceedings in Bermuda (UNCITRAL) in respect of claims from a US financial institution arising from US class actions.

Since 1979, Nelson Barry has successfully represented individuals in trial, arbitration and mediation of claims for compensation for personal injury and wrongful death arising from vehicle accidents, slip and falls, dog attacks and asbestos claims.

Notable cases include Metall Market OOO v Vitorio Shipping, The «Lehmann Timber» (Court of Appeal); Global Process Systems v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia, The «Cendor MOPU» (Supreme Court); Commercial Court actions and arbitrations relating to the petrochemical industry, including offshore construction and the litigation arising from the Buncefield tank farm explosion; shipbuilding, ship finance and ship sale disputes; shipping and commodities cases, raising a diverse range of issues relating to contracts of sale, bills of lading and Charterparties and Arbitration Act 1996 applications.

This arises from the likes of multinational ventures, such as energy projects, and can be instigated in two ways: investors and host states either consent in contracts to use international arbitration to resolve disputes, or investors make claims under bilateral (or multilateral) investment treaties (BITs).

Advising US excess liability insurers in ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration on coverage for claims of a professional advisers» captive arising from US tax shelters.

Advising Bermudan marine and energy reinsurers on losses arising from the Macondo oil spill («Deepwater Horizon») and from the total loss of the Costa Concordia in respect of London JELC arbitration disputes under Industry Loss Warranty products provided by hedge fund capital market transactions.

He also successfully represented a major US energy company in an LCIA arbitration over off - shore oil rights seated in London, a European company in a fast - track arbitration in Zurich, a major industrial group in an ad hoc insurance arbitration seated in London, a leading European oil company in an ICC arbitration seated in London, a private equity firm in an ICC arbitration seated in Geneva, a US insurance company in an M&A arbitration seated in Paris, and a major multinational capital equipment manufacturer in institutional and other arbitrations in multiple European fora arising from power plant projects.

International experts propose the use of international arbitration to resolve disputes arising from human rights abuse involving business.

The first law provided Mexico's tax court with the exclusive jurisdiction over claims relating to public contracts (which the dispute in the arbitration arose under) and moreover, retroactively changed the statute of limitations to make a claim under public contracts from 10 years to 45 days.

A number of interesting points arose from the keynote speeches and the subsequent discussions, which not only provided valuable insight into the manner in which African arbitral institutions are contributing to the growth of arbitration, but also gave indication of potential future trends.

Faculty grievances related to workload arising from the return to work shall proceed directly to the board of arbitration who shall have the powers referenced in Article 32.