Not exact matches
The lawsuit
against the shooter's former
employer, G4S, alleges that it knew he was mentally unstable and threatening violence, yet they employed him as an
armed guard, obtained his security license from the state with the use of a fraudulently signed psychological assessment, and repeatedly gave him weapons training, making him a more effective and dangerous shooter.
It is clear that the EAT did not regard its conclusion as representing a satisfactory state of affairs, particularly where the joint or concurrent tortfeasors are at
arms» length, eg as in Bullimore v Porthecary Witham Weld [2011] IRLR 18 where an ex-
employer gave a damaging reference about the claimant to a prospective
employer because the ex-employee had presented a sex discrimination claim
against them and the prospective
employer withdrew the offer for the same reason, and in circumstances where CLIA 1978 applies to discrimination claims brought in the ordinary courts.
A UK Employment Tribunal has dismissed a number of claims brought by Mr Harrington
against his former
employer, the Army and Air Force Exchange Services («AAFES»)-- an integral part of the US
Armed Forces — on -LSB-...]
The wrongful death lawsuit
against the shooter's former
employer, G4S, alleges that it knew the shooter was mentally unstable and threatening violence, yet obtained his security license from the state with the use of a fraudulently signed psychological assessment, employed him as an
armed guard, and repeatedly gave him weapons training.
The USERRA requires reinstatement of employees who have served in the
armed services and prohibits an
employer from discriminating
against those in the
armed services.
Armed with this more realistic number, you can now compare it
against the amount of coverage you have from your
employer's group plan or from your current individual policy and decide whether you need to buy more.