In one case, complaints
arose about the judge's attitude and demeanor.
Not exact matches
Judge Carlos Lucero, in a partial dissent, argued against such immunity: «The notion that a device manufacturer is immune from liability for harm caused by its device when the manufacturer has pushed the device for a use that the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] never approved is neither logical nor consistent with the Supreme Court's prior rulings
about the scope of preemption of claims
arising from harm caused by medical devices.»
, National Review (1/1/07), Matthew Franck doesn't buy Roberts» argument
about a constitutional crisis
arising from federal
judges departing the bench in search of higher pay.
This case involved the complaint
arising from the notorious comments he made to a sexual assault complainant, and other pejorative comments
about the law of sexual assault, during a trial when he was a
judge of the Provincial Court of Alberta, at Calgary.
The Defendant sought costs and an issue
arose about who was best to address this, the presiding
judge for the initial trial or the
judge who would ultimately oversee the mistrial.
Lahav focuses on the way in which equity practice relied on a non-adversarial,
judge - centered system (something Kessler has written
about before) and how adversarialism
arose from that.