Why we are defaulting to a state of no transparency
around gun ownership is baffling to me.
That result is surprising, given the increasingly divisive nature of the debate
around gun ownership.
Not exact matches
Around when Australia adopted its
gun regulations, Parliament passed legislation banning private
ownership of handguns in Britain and banned semiautomatic and pump - action firearms throughout the UK.
Read more about the debate
around mental illness and
gun ownership.
But even though the 5 - 4 majority ruling makes an intellectual end run
around the language of the Second Amendment to get to their ruling, they very clearly state that society (government, convened to collectively protect us from what we can't protect ourselves from as individuals) has the right to, and legitimate interest in controlling
gun ownership, in several specific ways.
To put it more empirically, much of the debate surrounding
gun violence in the U.S. — and elsewhere — revolves
around rates of civil small arms
ownership.