Sentences with phrase «arrangement is best for your family»

It is important to seek specialist advice on all of the options before deciding what arrangement is best for your family.

Not exact matches

It's the sort of arrangement that appears to have worked well for a number of The Rich 100 families, including the Saputo, Weston and Desmarais families, all of whom brought children into the business well before the founders stepped back.

How do you demonstrate that you and your partner are both equally suited as parents and this is the childcare arrangement that works best for your family?

While co-sleeping for a long period of time may work well for some families, there are always some downsides to this sleeping arrangement that you should keep in mind.

Family courts across the nation generally agree that joint custody is the best arrangement for the child.

Even before baby's born, you'll be making arrangements for their health and wellbeing by finding a pediatrician that works best for your family's lifestyle.

They discount the possibility that a father - to - be would research parenting options, discuss them with his partner and together they would make a decision on the sleep arrangements that they feel are best for their family.

It is commonly assumed that the low wages often found in female - dominated workplaces can be justified through better provision of family - friendly arrangements, but the research provides evidence that low wages are accompanied by worse working conditions for many.

Well, my arrangement basically just misses Christmas, as I'm going back to the states to visit family for almost three weeks since we have a long Christmas vacation in the master's program.

If we can wrap our minds around this core proposition — that accountability is about outcomes, not inputs, practices, curriculum, staffing arrangements, budgets, uses of time, etc. — and the related proposition that families have the right to choose the schools they think best for their daughters and sons, we can save ourselves an awful lot of grief, not to mention many regulations and much bureaucracy.

If after submitting your application you see a rescue corgi on our site that is of particular interest to you, please contact our rescue chair to express your interest and to make arrangements for a home interview so that we can better assess the fit between the rescue corgi and the potential new family.

They'll be well provided for in the room, as well — staff stocks family rooms with activity kits and kid - sized slippers and toothbrushes, and will gladly help you make arrangements to visit local kid - friendly sights (Disney Hong Kong, perhaps).

Hi do your maisonettes have a kitchen area and what are the sleeping arrangements for a family of 4 just trying to work out if I'm half board would I be better in a family room or a maisonette.

By looking at your family's individual circumstances, we will employ our vast experience and work to craft and advocate for the best parenting time arrangements that will be to the greatest advantage of your children, taking into account their specific needs.

These professionals examine family dynamics, the children and the parents» relationships with the children and recommend what they think are the best parenting arrangements for your children.

Jeffery Associates LLP can help you navigate the complex world of mortgages, helping you reach an arrangement that is the best financially for you and your family.

These orders can be obtained from Family Courts if parents can't agree on the best arrangements for their children or where one, or both, parents want to have their arrangements set out in a formal Court - approved order.

Determining what the arrangements for minor children will be before and during the divorce, as well as maintaining these relationships over time, can be a difficult and stressful process for families in Orlando.

Her lawyers state that the actress believes this is the best arrangement for the sake of her family's «health,» Time reports.

Get ideas for custody arrangements and considerations and determine what is best for your family situation

/ School restorative conferencing / School restorative conferencing / School setting / Schools / School's contribution / Secure accommodation (1) / Secure accommodation (2) / Self / Self awareness for facilitators / Self in family work / Self - blame / Self - development / Self exposed / Self - expressions / Self formation / Self - injury (1) / Self - injury (2) / Self - injury (3) / Self - mutilation / Self - mutilation: an examination of a growing phenomenon / Self renewal / Self - supervision (1) / Self - supervision (2) / Selfishness / altruism / Separation and Loss / Separations / Service user involvement / Severe personality disorder / Sex education / Sexual abuse / Sexual abuse in an institutional setting / Sexual abuse recovery work / Shaping modifying environments / Sharing and bearing with a child / Showing that life can be enjoyable / Significant adults / Significant learning / Silence / Silent voices / Single cause / Size of residential settings / Sleep / Small group living / Small groups / Social brain (The) / Social care in Ireland / Social care — the field / Social change / Social competence (1) / Social competence (2) / Social Competencies: Affect / Social networks in restricted settings / Social Pedagogy / Social policy / Social skills training (1) / Social skills training (2) / Social skills training (3) / Social skills training (4) / Social skills training (5) / Socratic questioning / Solution - focused principles / Some unanswered questions / Space and place / Space under threat / Spaces / Spatial arrangements / Special considerations in the development process / Spiritual connection / Spiritual well - being / Spirituality / St. John Bosco / Staff and sexual orientation / Staff induction / Staff integrity / Staff meeting / Staff morale / Staff morale in children's homes / Staff retention / Staff selection / Staff support / Staff training groups in institutions / Staff turnover / Staff values and discipline / Staffing / Statement of Purpose / Status of care workers / Stealing / Steering a middle course / Stigma / Story, time, motion, place / Story unfolding / Storybook reading / Street children (1) / Street children (2) / Street children (3) / Street children (4) / Street children (5) / Street children (6) / Street children and self - determination / Street corner / Street kids / Street youth and prostitution / Streetsmart kids / Stress / Stress in child care work / Strengths (1) / Strengths (2) / Strengths (3) / Structure of activities / Structured storying / Structuring the relationship / Stuck clients / Students / Students, self and practice / Succeeding with at - risk youth / Successful careers / Suicidal behaviour in GLB youth / Suicide (1) / Suicide (2) / Suicide attempts / Suicide risk / Suitability for practice / Supervision (1) / Supervision (2) / Supervision (3) / Supervision (4) / Supervision (5) / Supervision (6) / Supervision (7) / Supervision (8) / Supervision (9) / Supervision and ethics / Supervision and practice / Supervision and teaching / Supervision formats / Supervision: Parallel process / Supervision wish list / Supervisor insecurity / Support for self - harm / Support for self - harm / Symbolic communication / Symptom tolerance guaranteed / Systemic thinking / Systems (1) / Systems (2) / Systems (3) / Systems and spheres of influence / Systems thinking / Systems vs developmental views /

Whilst referrals can be made independent of solicitor, if you are in the process of sorting out arrangements for children, it is always best to seek the advice of a specialist family solicitor to guide you through the process.

Many parents think this type of arrangement is a better option for them and their children because it allows flexibility in what a family based arrangement contains and no - one else has to get involved.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practiBest interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practibest interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practibest interests for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.

When a family disagrees about arrangements for children after separation, an FDR practitioner is a good person to ask for help.

If you would like help to communicate better with your ex-partner and make practical arrangements for your children, family mediation might be for you.

Our website is packed full of information on how our family mediators can support Scottish parents to make the best arrangements for their children after separation.

For instance, it would be best for you to not ask about how the family can help you financially with medical bills, living arrangements and any other expenses related to your pregnanFor instance, it would be best for you to not ask about how the family can help you financially with medical bills, living arrangements and any other expenses related to your pregnanfor you to not ask about how the family can help you financially with medical bills, living arrangements and any other expenses related to your pregnancy.

There is no one standard for open adoptions; each family works out an arrangement that works well for them.

The General Assembly, Guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and good faith in the fulfilment of the obligations assumed by States in accordance with the Charter, Affirming that indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples, while recognizing the right of all peoples to be different, to consider themselves different, and to be respected as such, Affirming also that all peoples contribute to the diversity and richness of civilizations and cultures, which constitute the common heritage of humankind, Affirming further that all doctrines, policies and practices based on or advocating superiority of peoples or individuals on the basis of national origin or racial, religious, ethnic or cultural differences are racist, scientifically false, legally invalid, morally condemnable and socially unjust, Reaffirming that indigenous peoples, in the exercise of their rights, should be free from discrimination of any kind, Concerned that indigenous peoples have suffered from historic injustices as a result of, inter alia, their colonization and dispossession of their lands, territories and resources, thus preventing them from exercising, in particular, their right to development in accordance with their own needs and interests, Recognizing the urgent need to respect and promote the inherent rights of indigenous peoples which derive from their political, economic and social structures and from their cultures, spiritual traditions, histories and philosophies, especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources, Recognizing also the urgent need to respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements with States, Welcoming the fact that indigenous peoples are organizing themselves for political, economic, social and cultural enhancement and in order to bring to an end all forms of discrimination and oppression wherever they occur, Convinced that control by indigenous peoples over developments affecting them and their lands, territories and resources will enable them to maintain and strengthen their institutions, cultures and traditions, and to promote their development in accordance with their aspirations and needs, Recognizing that respect for indigenous knowledge, cultures and traditional practices contributes to sustainable and equitable development and proper management of the environment, Emphasizing the contribution of the demilitarization of the lands and territories of indigenous peoples to peace, economic and social progress and development, understanding and friendly relations among nations and peoples of the world, Recognizing in particular the right of indigenous families and communities to retain shared responsibility for the upbringing, training, education and well - being of their children, consistent with the rights of the child, Considering that the rights affirmed in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements between States and indigenous peoples are, in some situations, matters of international concern, interest, responsibility and character, Considering also that treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements, and the relationship they represent, are the basis for a strengthened partnership between indigenous peoples and States, Acknowledging that the Charter of the United Nations, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 2 as well as the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, (3) affirm the fundamental importance of the right to self - determination of all peoples, by virtue of which they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, Bearing in mind that nothing in this Declaration may be used to deny any peoples their right to self - determination, exercised in conformity with international law, Convinced that the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples in this Declaration will enhance harmonious and cooperative relations between the State and indigenous peoples, based on principles of justice, democracy, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and good faith, Encouraging States to comply with and effectively implement all their obligations as they apply to indigenous peoples under international instruments, in particular those related to human rights, in consultation and cooperation with the peoples concerned,

CUSTODY AND ACCESS: AN N.A.W.L. BRIEF to the Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access, March 1998, citing to Valerie King, «Variation in the Consequences of Non-Resident Father Involvement for Child's Well - being,» (1994), 56 Journal of Marriage and the Family: 963 - 972; Denise Donnelly and David Finkelhorn, «Does Equality in Custody Arrangement Improve the Parent - Child Relationship?»

In addition, 250,000 or more of the increase in home - based providers could be for relatives or other informal care for individual children, which is often used by families with infants and very young children as well as for more limited after - school care arrangements.

At the Law Offices of Molly B. Kenny, we are committed to helping parents get the best parenting plan and custody arrangement for their children and their family.

Figuring out the best custody arrangements for your children and family is best served when you don't let the legal terms confuse you.

The CBA family section believes that any discussion of «parental rights» is misguided when resolving arrangements for children and that the sole focus must be what is best for children.

There is a link there to click and print a formatted version of these child custody timesharing options) for your reference or discussions of what child custody arrangements might work best for your Colorado family.

If joint legal or physical custody is not a good fit for a family, a judge will order a different type of arrangement.

If your current arrangement does not meet their needs as well as it could, that's when child custody changes may be a good fit for your family.

If you have opened a Child Support Agency or Child Maintenance Service case you can close it at any time and make your own arrangements instead, if you decide that a family - based arrangement is better for you and your family.

This study indicates that, on average, a two parent intact family is the best arrangement for children, and a shared parenting arrangement is better than a sole custody arrangement, i.e., a two - parent family is better even if parents are divorced.

-- CUSTODY AND ACCESS: AN N.A.W.L. BRIEF to the Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access, March 1998, citing to Valerie King, «Variation in the Consequences of Non-Resident Father Involvement for Child's Well - being,» (1994), 56 Journal of Marriage and the Family: 963 - 972; Denise Donnelly and David Finkelhorn, «Does Equality in Custody Arrangement Improve the Parent - Child Relationship?»

If a parent can not comply with parenting time arrangements, despite their good faith efforts to do so, or if they are inadvertently late for a pickup or drop off, it would not be wise to immediately seek court sanctions under either the family law or criminal law statutes.

Discussions regarding the finances of physical separation and what arrangement works best for your family are often our first conversation

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.

A personal preference for joint custody however, whatever it is based on, and however entitled each of us may be to hold our personal preferences nevertheless can not be defended as having been chosen based on scientific findings that the arrangement results in better post-litigation outcomes for children and their families.