Separation may require meetings to work out
arrangements for raising children and dividing property and possessions.
Not exact matches
It is evident from modern society that marriage and commitment are beneficial, both in terms of a stable environment
for raising children and as a safe and relatively non-contentious
arrangement for se - xual relationships.
It is important to note that an open
arrangement,
for many women, is the deciding factor in whether or not a woman
raises their
child or gives their
child up
for adoption.
That means there is so far no way of determining which familial
arrangements might be optimal
for raising children: parents working with grandparents, siblings
raising children together, or some other
arrangement.
Iowa law requires that the court must consider the best interest of the
child and order a custody
arrangement that will give the
child the chance
for maximum continuing physical and emotional contact with both parents after the parents have separated and dissolved the marriage, and which will encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of
raising the
child unless physical harm or significant emotional harm to the
child, other
children, or a parent is likely to occur.
What starts as a professional spark turns into a romantic one after Olive confesses her love
for both Elizabeth and William; the three would go on to live together and
raise children together as a trio, an
arrangement that was even more taboo in the 1940s than it is today.
There's 21 mm more room between the first and second - row while the three - row / seven - seat
arrangement is
raised slightly allowing a better view forward
for children.
They need somewhere to
raise their concerns and have the parenting
arrangements for their
children clearly spelled out.
If a parent's living
arrangements include providing a home
for children from another relationship, expenses related to
raising those
children may reduce the parent's calculated income
for the purpose of determining
child support.
Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all of the following are true
for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution of the issues, (b) you would like to keep open the possibility of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be
raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your
children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have ethical or spiritual beliefs that place high value on taking personal responsibility
for handling conflicts with integrity, (f) you value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting
arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and often unpredictable range of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available in the public court system and want a more creative and individualized range of choices available to you and your spouse or partner
for resolving the issues.
A grandparent or another caregiver who has taken responsibility
for raising a
child may seek a formal
arrangement from an Ohio court.
A grandparent or another caregiver who has taken responsibility
for raising a
child may seek a formal
arrangement from...
A legally ordered
arrangement,
for parents who do not live together, by which neither parent is considered the sole custodial parent but equally share the rights and responsibilities
for raising the
child (ren).
In recent years, the responsible fatherhood field has expanded beyond its roots in employment and parenting services
for low - income fathers, recognizing the need to also help fathers enhance their relationship skills.4 Research indicates that
children raised by both parents in low ‐ conflict homes achieve better scores, on average,
for a host of indicators.5 Non-residential fathers face various communication and relationship challenges that can affect engagement with their
children and willingness to pay
child support.6 By providing services to help fathers communicate openly in healthy, cooperative parenting relationships, programs can improve potential outcomes
for children, irrespective of their parents» living
arrangements.
Another example
raises the question of what influences advocacy, this one from a woman lawyer and AFCC activist who inexplicably lobbies
for joint custody and father's rights (and more therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts) even though the
arrangement worked
for neither herself as a
child, nor, ultimately, her own daughter: [ANONYMOUS LISTSERVE COMMENT]: «In personal life, we learn things about the day to day realities too, that influence the lenses through which we see life.
The consideration of one parent's financial ability to support a custody
arrangement should not discriminate against the parent who stayed home to
raise the
children or whose earning capacity is less
for a number of reasons, including status in the society.
So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials
for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving
child support, as well as the custody
arrangements of the MHP's own
children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with
children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and
for how many
children, and
for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring
for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and
raising happy, healthy, successful
children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.