Not exact matches
There is an interesting
article in this month's
Global Environmental Change journal.
The
article «Seepage: Climate
change denial and its effect on the scientific community» just appeared in Global Environmental C
change denial and its effect on the scientific community» just appeared in
Global Environmental ChangeChange.
Our recent
article «Seepage: Climate
change denial and its effect on the scientific community» in Global Environmental Change, authored by me and Naomi Oreskes, James S. Risbey, Ben R. Newell, and Michael Smithson, has attracted a bit of attention over the last few
change denial and its effect on the scientific community» in
Global Environmental Change, authored by me and Naomi Oreskes, James S. Risbey, Ben R. Newell, and Michael Smithson, has attracted a bit of attention over the last few
Change, authored by me and Naomi Oreskes, James S. Risbey, Ben R. Newell, and Michael Smithson, has attracted a bit of attention over the last few days.
My new
article in
Global Environmental Politics finds that climate
change will eventually expose toxic waste, long immobilized by ice, at Camp Century, which the U.S. military left in the 1960s.
Together with colleagues Tim Ballard, Klaus Oberauer, and Rasmus Benestad, I published an
article last week in
Global Environmental Change.
From the
article:... While and colleagues (2009:2) observe that the
global campaign to address anthropogenic climate
change has recently become «the new «master concept» of
environmental governance,» eclipsing biological diversity conservation as the central organizing principle around which ecological work is undertaken.
Some of the
environmental topics and categories that we now focus on include climate
change and the effects of
global warming, including their various impacts on both people and the planet as well as conservation issues and news
articles relating to nature and wildlife.
In one study, for instance, when political conservatives were shown a fake newspaper
article that framed the science of climate
change as supporting an «anti-pollution solution to
global warming» — presumably suggesting
environmental regulations, perhaps by the EPA — their denial of the science actually increased, relative to a group of conservatives who had not been shown any newspaper
article.