Baron was the one who got the ball rolling when he realized that there could be more to a recent Globe
article about a priest who'd molested children.
Not exact matches
So given the topic of this
article — which is
about Men of God diddling little boys — is the way
priests look at children better than they way us filthy westerners look at women?
I read an
article about a woman who cut off a guy's penis and it was reattached... not by a
priest or pope, but by a medically trained surgeon.
Read this
article about the «blue - haired Episcopal
priest blessing animals in Bushwick park.»
I can't seem to be able to comment on the newest
article about the role of John Paul in covering up the abuse of children by
priests.
For instance, an
article about the hypocrisy of a
priest who committed a s.e.x crime.
If you want to read
about more good contributions by catholic
priests, try reading the other
article about child abuse.
For instance, when the whole «
priests and pedophilia» media debacle happened, newspapers could not factually claim that
priests are at an increased risk of being pedophiles (because the reverse is actually true), so instead, they would pair stories
about priests with unrelated generic
articles about pedophilia in the front page.
Mike Hulme, one of the high
priests of post-normal science, has explained this new religion in his book Why We Disagree
About Climate Change and in various
articles he has written and interviews he has given.