Sentences with phrase «article about religious»

I asked for a scientist that is non-religious tha rejects evolution... and you post an article about religious scientists... thanks for proving my point.

This is an article about religious rights, and has no political content.

(Please see the comment by the author of this article about religious illiteracy.)

You are the reason we atheists can't stand reiligious people, TCB: in the comments section of an article about the religious knowledge of the general public, you waste all of your time talking about heaven and hell instead of the topic at hand.

Foreign preachers were allowed into the country, and there were articles about religious freedom in official Chinese media, the State Department said.

Not exact matches

Canadian and Alberta voters need to understand that every time you get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all you need to do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report into the ditch, or read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon you will realize the propaganda and hate these clowns spread about their own political / religious views trying to scare the general population to their side or views.

Every time I get annoyed at Justin Trudeau and the way he manages the country all I do is listen to the radio and Charles Adler rant about him or read articles by Lorne Gunter and Rick Bell from the Edmonton Sun (who formerly worked at the Alberta Report, and helped Ted Byfield run the Alberta Report into the ditch, or read anything written by Colby Cosh or Ezra Levant and soon I realize the propaganda and hate these clowns try and spread about their own political / religious views I revert back to supporting the more liberal viewpoint).

No but I think you atheists stick to religious articles so your little fantasy about Christians can be real.These are people who have no idea who they are..

For you to hatefully comment on religious articles about how much you HATE religion is a lot like someone complaining of a headache while bashing their forehead with a mallet.

I think you're reading things in her article that aren't there, and using her article to expose your own feelings about «religious» types.

Back during the (George W.) Bush Administration, I spent (or rather wasted) some time reading books and articles written by journalists who were suspicious (I hesitate to say paranoid) about those suspicious and paranoid fringe religious kooks (theonomists and theocrats) who threatened to take over....

How about if you actually paid attention to the article it stated that religious or not he's books mimicked stories from the bible..

Later, when interviewed in a 2006 article in the New York Times Sunday magazine about current religious thinking on artificial contraception, Mohler elaborated: «I can not imagine any development in human history, after the Fall, that has had a greater impact on human beings than the Pill....

An overly long article describing how the devout struggles over something no one cares about, and a professional opinion from BU telling us that these religious nutjobs are taking things way too seriously.

While the more educated may smirk about such articles, there is a lot of value in helping people analyze and understand the book upon which they place their beliefs, especially when it becomes legislation and policy that affects people outside the religious bubble.

For the same reason the religious nutcases pour over into every other article about gays or atheists.

The journal ran articles on «the religious significance of poetry,» and others with titles like «Shall Pastors Know Something About Art?»

it is pretty hilarious to see all the same folks who complain about atheists on all the religious articles are all here on this atheist article doing exactly what they complain about.

It is therefore quite significant that a recent article by Bultmann seems to be by implication a defence of Ksemarm's position against an initial criticism by the Barthian Hermann Diem: Diem had maintained that when all is said and done Käsemann has presented Jesus as only proclaiming «general religious and moral truths» about «the freedom of the children of God», rather than a message in continuity with the Church's kerygma.

My comments about whiny christians, laptop dogooders, etc... comes from the many negative comments my husband has towards tv evangilism, religious debates that he has listened to, articles in newspapers, & obviously his / our personal experiences.

Books and articles are still written about the major contributions of particular religious figures such as Jonathan Mayhew, the great Boston Puritan preacher, or the overall contributions of each of the particular denominations from the Baptists to the Roman Catholics.

Think about that, an article saying the Republicans are not holding their candidates to a religious litmus test and the liberal reaction is,...

Even more sad is that this article is about real heroes and the point of the article is lost in this religious debate.

The article is only irrelevant if the voting public ignores, or at least doesn't care about religious beliefs.

This article is about the religious accepting scientific evidence.

In an article for the Church Herald, the magazine of the Reformed Church in America, Wes Pippert of United Press International has written: «For the Christian, it may be too much to expect reporters with little knowledge of biblical morality to report incisively or insightfully [about religious concerns]....

How about an article discussing Romney's religious beliefs?

This article should be of no interest to you or any other Atheists, yet there are plenty of them making negative comments about the church and people who are religious.

From the article, talking about the UK — «In fact, the country is one of the less religious ones in Europe, home to vociferous critics of religion like Richard Dawkins, and those who find belief in a higher power simply unnecessary, like Stephen Hawking.»

Why is this article only about religious people who are sick of religion in politics?

I don't understand why people keep complaining about how horrible religion and religious people are on the comment sections of articles.

Dear Mr. Happy, Although I thought this article was to be about Priests performing exorcisms, I do understand your frustration w the whole mind - frame that is put out there regarding religious sources & what family you may or may NOT be born into.

@William Demuth, The KCStar article was talking about the church of the Pastor of the shelter where this guy stayed, not the Weiler's religious beliefs.

but fortunately there are psychologists, mental health practitioners and others who do and I have benefitted greatly from their work, personal testimonies and the various articles / publications which they have produced --(for example, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology; The Religious & Spiritual Problems category in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV) published by the American Psychiatric Association; The US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health PubMed.gov database of healthcare and scientific literature)-- about the adverse psychological effects which can arise when persons engage in intense / deep spiritual practices such as intense / deep prayer, fasting and meditation which alter their state of consciousness.

Oh the irony of atheists seeking out religious articles and then making comments about being «oppressed» or having religion shoved down their throat.

All of you athiest / non believers are always commenting negatively on articles about God and other religious articles.

Unfortunately the whole article does not describe people who are actually spiritual anymore than those that decry religion are talking about good religious followers.

The entire premise of this article is ridiculous because no one needs to care or worry about anyone else's personal religious views of what will happen to them when they die!

It sounds like, from reading the article and the comments, that atheists, spiritualists and the religious really all know next to nothing about one another.

It's just my opinion that the Christians, are continually in fight and over-reaction mode, not only about this topic, but... on the rest of the religious blogs / articles in general.

This article will focus on sexual inclusiveness, the frequent misunderstanding of which was brought home to me recently when a friend told me about a paper he had just written on a religious topic.

If his church says he should write articles on CNN about why the «spiritual but not religious» crowd doesn't know what they're talking about, I'd gladly retract my comment.

That article was the one titled «CS Lewis on gay marriage» which is about whether or not those who disagree with gay marriage for religious reasons should appose it on a legislative level.

funniest thing about religious articles is the immediate comments from atheists and forever haters of religion.

Also, did you read the newsweek article entitled «Our Mutual Joy» about the religious case for gay marriage?

There was a recent article on the Religious blog about how Evangelical young «uns are not waiting for marriage.

The most obvious example is every time there is an article about religion made by CNN or any others on the internet, atheists are there first posting their filthy comments way before any religious people even commented.

Some of you miserable freaks are just whining about how this article is by «stupid ignorant religious people» who «embarrass» this country.

We now, from this one article, know more about Perry (who might not even be on the ballot) religious views and upbringing than we could ever hope to know.

Usually we see articles written superficially about other subject as pretext to make a religious or spiritual point.