One issue included substantial right - to - reply from Baby Milk Action when
an article made false claims about our monitoring.
Not exact matches
When comparing two sources: one a health blogger with a 30 year old medical degree, now retired, ranting on the Internet and
making false claims ABOUT
false claims, and the other, a researcher with a current university position, with an
article published in a questionable journal, but with legitimate references... whom do you feel wins out on credibility?
The only specific
claims I see being
made are by the author of this
article, which are demonstrably
false claims.
But 24
articles in 18 different journals, collectively
making several different arguments against global warming, expose that
claim as
false.
The graph is «nearly flat» is a trick of the eye, exploited by Rose in his
article to
make false claims and mislead readers.
One of the authors of the
article seems quite confused about subsidies and even
made the
false claim that wind energy receives no subsidies:»... wind has received no government incentives, Jacobson said.»
I work for a travel insurer who distributes product through several online sources and: * A traveler has the opportunity to read policy exclusions in the same way they would on a comparison site * All our products offer a free look period — it's the law not a comparison site selling advantage * We don't use
false advertising to sell — unfair
claim to
make in such a broad way, especially when this
article does just that.