Sentences with phrase «article on climate modeling»

There are plenty of article on climate modeling on this site — explaining what they are, what they are used for, why you can't get a perfect model and how they are evaluated and how we decide what they are (and are not) useful for.

I was interviewed recently for a news article on climate model tuning, which said:... nearly every model has been calibrated precisely to the 20th century climate records — otherwise it would have ended up in the trash.

Not exact matches

I can read any peer - reviewed article I like on modern climate models, but until I go through much of the process of building, running, validation, discussing with colleagues how they solved particular wrinkles etc of some models, I am unlikely to fully comprehend climate modelling as a skilled craft.

Lessee... for example, we have this article archived at the Fraser Institue from 1999 on the exaggerated predictions of climate models in Arctic regions, by Baliunas & Soon:

This last article presents IDRA's major findings in the classroom level indicators, focusing on the program model, classroom climate, curriculum and instruction, teacher expectations, and program articulation.

I can read any peer - reviewed article I like on modern climate models, but until I go through much of the process of building, running, validation, discussing with colleagues how they solved particular wrinkles etc of some models, I am unlikely to fully comprehend climate modelling as a skilled craft.

I keep re-reading Von Storch's articles on what climate models are, and so on, but also keep on coming out with the idea that Mann did just what Von Storch says shold be done.

(Full disclosure, I spoke to him a couple of times for this article and I'm working on tuning description paper for the US climate modeling centers).

Show in the above figure (Figure 2d from the article) is the D'Arrigo et al tree - ring based NH reconstruction (blue) along with the climate model (NCAR CSM 1.4) simulated NH mean temperatures (red) and the «simulated tree - ring» NH temperature series based on driving the biological growth model with the climate model simulated temperatures (green).

A while ago Eli pointed to a 2005 article by Thomas Knutson and Robert Tulyea on hurricane modeling as an example of fine climate snark

Based on the peer review comments exposed in this article, I ran a model which showed climate modelers to be children allowed to play with big computers.

The climate model output (CMIP5) that will contribute to the 5th Assessment Report of the International Panel on Climate Change (AR5 IPCC) are available and have been evaluated in several journal arclimate model output (CMIP5) that will contribute to the 5th Assessment Report of the International Panel on Climate Change (AR5 IPCC) are available and have been evaluated in several journal arClimate Change (AR5 IPCC) are available and have been evaluated in several journal articles.

Reblogged this on gottadobetterthanthis and commented: — Down into the tedious weeds, but exceptionally good article showing that there is no value whatsoever in climate models.

We have three excellent participants joining this discussion: Bart van den Hurk of KNMI in The Netherlands who is actively involved in the KNMI scenario's, Jason Evans from the University of Newcastle, Australia, who is coordinator of Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) and Roger Pielke Sr. who through his research articles and his weblog Climate Science is well known for his outspoken views on climate modClimate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) and Roger Pielke Sr. who through his research articles and his weblog Climate Science is well known for his outspoken views on climate modClimate Science is well known for his outspoken views on climate modclimate modelling.

After all, Professor Judith Curry complained that she had been misattributed not just for this week's article (she claims she never said climate models were «deeply flawed» despite the article attributing this comment to her), but for the Mail on Sunday article last year where he also quoted her.

«After all, Professor Judith Curry complained that she had been mis - attributed not just for this week's article (she claims she never said climate models were «deeply flawed» despite the article attributing this comment to her), but for the Mail on Sunday article last year where he also quoted her.

He rewrote Wikipedia's articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling.

Graham Readfearn comments on the piece in an article in The Guardian, noting that Evans's theory had arose from a series of over 11 blog posts he had on his wife's blog (JoNova) where Evans claims to have found fundamental problems with climate models.

Hang on... we've been told for years by apparent top climate scientists to expect less snowfalls, climate models predict warmer winters, ex-politicians claiming ice - free polar caps, hand - wringing news articles of children who would never experience snowfalls, on and on... but now we're expected to believe exactly the opposite because that's what's happening now.

Dan Kahan of Yale University and four colleagues have just published an article in Annals of the AAPS titled: Geoengineering and Climate Change Polarization Testing a Two - Channel Model of Science Communication that investigates the effect on study participants» attitudes to climate change after reading an article about geoenginClimate Change Polarization Testing a Two - Channel Model of Science Communication that investigates the effect on study participants» attitudes to climate change after reading an article about geoenginclimate change after reading an article about geoengineering.

Take a look at Kerr's article of today's Science (Climate Change Hot Spots Mapped Across the United States) to understand why it important to know that the models are poor (or rubbish, as you say) on a local scale.

When even genuine climate scientists can not get a short article published, that tries make other climate scientists aware of data that might have a slightly negative effect on AGW theory (as in the CO2 warming might not be as bad as predicted by climate models), well, you know for certain that climate science is no - longer functioning as a science.