Sentences with phrase «articles against the justice»

Rosenstein's comments came at the end of a wide - ranging conversation at the Newseum in Washington to commemorate Law Day, which happened to fall a day after the Washington Post reported that conservative allies of President Trump had drafted impeachment articles against the Justice Department's No. 2 official.

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Tuesday that the Justice Department is «not going to be extorted» after members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus drafted articles of impeachment against him.

There in articles 3 and 4 he can find what Thomas thinks about mercy as the greatest attribute of God, its precedence over and against justice, and that mercy presupposes justice and is its plenitude — affirmations Moloney thinks must be criticized.

In a statement, the DORH said: «State Attorney's Office in Osijek opened the investigation against Croatian citizen (1985) due to the existence of reasonable doubt that when giving testimony before the County Court in Osijek committed a crime against justice by giving false testimony under Article 305, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code / 11.

This was at a time when the appointing authorities were not privy to the alleged acts of misconduct or wrongdoings brought against him and 21 Circuit Court Judges and Magistrates who have been referred to the Chief Justice to be dealt with in accordance with Article 151 of the 1992 Constitution by tigereyepi for alleged stated misbehaviour.

Meanwhile, in order to expedite investigations into the alleged stated misconduct by the High Court Judges, the Chief Justice in accordance with a decision of the Judicial Council has constituted a second Committee to investigate the matter against three of the Judges in line with article 146 (4).

An advertiser's announcement in the media on Tuesday entitled: «In the investigative committee (Article 146); In the matter of a petition by Anas Aremeyaw Anas for the removal from office of Justice John Ajet Nassam», the committee noted: «You are hereby notified that following a prima facie case established against you on allegation of misconduct for ex-parte discussion with one party on a case pending before you...»

I am left confused because I am wondering why the petitioners weren't bold enough to ask the party to also call the founder to order or take a disciplinary action against him too, certainly it therefore defeats the ideals of fairness and justice that they sought to seek for which the quoted article 47 of the NDC party constitution as basis for their action; does it grant some immunity to the former president, I doubt and therefore see the action of the petitioners very flawed and skewed.

Since I could not directly read or post comments in that article, due to location restrictions, and also since I found the name of Mr. Bloomberg here, I come here to demonstrate my public challenge against fascism crimes, miscarriage of justice coming along with Thrun;

The 4 - 1 majority ruling in favour of an application brought before the Supreme Court by lawyers for Dr. Zanetor Agyeman — Rawlings was given on Thursday May 19 2016 in which the panel led by Justice William Atuguba stayed proceedings in the high court case against the candidature of Dr. Zanetor Agyeman - Rawlings pending the interpretation of article 94 (1)(a) of the 1992 constitution on June 2 2016.

Teachout is a staunch opponent of Citizens United — when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the bill constitutional, Justice Stevens cited one of Teachout's legal articles in his dissent — and one of her tactics in her campaign against Faso has been to call out his wealthy GOP backers.

The Turkish Ministry of Justice is currently deciding whether to bring charges against the academics for «denigrating Turkishness» under article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code.

In cases where Member States do not respect their obligations under EU law, the Commission can take legal action against them in the form of infringement proceedings before the Court of Justice under Article 258 TFEU.

The American Association for Justice (formerly known as the American Trial Lawyers Association) has filed an ethics complaint against ALJ Roy Pearson, who's suing a mom - and - pop dry - cleaning store for $ 65 million for allegedly losing his pants, as reported in this Law.com article, Ethics Complaint Filed Against Judge Over His $ 65M Suit Against Dry Clagainst ALJ Roy Pearson, who's suing a mom - and - pop dry - cleaning store for $ 65 million for allegedly losing his pants, as reported in this Law.com article, Ethics Complaint Filed Against Judge Over His $ 65M Suit Against Dry ClAgainst Judge Over His $ 65M Suit Against Dry ClAgainst Dry Cleaners.

Charges were dismissed by the Ontario Court of Justice in R v. Lowman against two individuals who, in connection with their creation of a website, were alleged to have engaged in... [more] Full article

The decision was upheld in a strong Court of Appeal, by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson and Lord Justice Kitchin, observing that it was «inescapable» that the High Court should find a breach of Article 3, the prohibition of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, against the police.

Liptak's article describes an Italian court that refused to enforce an Alabama judgment against an Italian company because the award included punitive damages — a concept offensive to Italian notions of justice.

I found race (according to the linked article and attorney cited there), being an officer (according to the primary salient fact in the linked article) or otherwise working in the local criminal justice system, and being the first case in a county (according to what distinguishing fact can be found in the article) as potential determiners of whether or not charges are brought against a caretaker.

In an article in the current New York Review of Books, «The Torture Memos: The Case Against the Lawyers,» Georgetown law professor David Cole examines the role and culpability of the lawyers of the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, who, under the Bush administration, wrote memoranda approving of and authorizing torture by the CIA.

Pursuant to Article III of the Constitution, justices of the Supreme Court, circuit judges and district judges receive lifetime appointments and protection against reduction in salary.3 Congress created the bankruptcy courts pursuant to its power under Article I of the Constitution and Article I bankruptcy judges do not enjoy the tenure and salary protections afforded to Article III judges under the Constitution.

Furthermore, although it is true that the procedure laid down in Article 267 TFEU is an instrument for cooperation between the Court of Justice and the national courts, by means of which the former provides the latter with the points of interpretation of EU law necessary in order for them to decide the disputes before them, the fact remains that when there is no judicial remedy under national law against the decision of a court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal is, in principle, obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU where a question relating to the interpretation of EU law is raised before it...

However, the SIA did not violate the principles of fundamental justice under section 7, as there was no international consensus that article 14 of the Convention Against Torture, which requires state parties to provide means for redress, was fundamental to the operation of the international legal system (at para 147).

The International Court of Justice has rejected jurisdiction over the claim brought by the Marshall Islands against the United Kingdom, alleging breach of the obligation (under Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty) to negotiate in good faith for nuclear disarmament.

Finally, Laurie Penny wrote a brilliant article in the New Statesman calling for everyone who cares about justice to start fighting back against legal aid cuts.

Mr Smith alleged that the proceedings as a whole, both criminal and civil, that had been brought against him in France were contrary to Article 6.1 and / or Article 6.3 of the ECHR and / or a breach of natural justice under English law.

In an article titled Ottawa drops appeal of ruling that gave no jail time to aboriginal man published in The Globe and Mail edition of August 30, 2016, Sean Fine described Justice Green's ruling as a «19,000 word cri de coeur against the over-incarceration of indigenous people and a rebellion against a convention in which traffickers are sentenced according to the quantity of the drugs they were selling.»

He then examined whether the restriction was justified under Article 9 (2) using a proportionality test, balancing D's right to manifest her religion against the interests of justice in conducting a fair trial for everyone involved.

By way of derogation from the rule laid down in Article 256 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, jurisdiction shall be reserved to the Court of Justice in the actions referred to in Articles 263 and 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union when they are brought by a Member State against:

Mr Dacre highlighted the case of Max Mosley, to whom Mr Justice Eady awarded damages against the News of the World for breaching his privacy under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act.

Your subject article honestly strikes me as «much ado about nothing» when weighed against other abuses of our justice system that seemingly come from within.