Sentences with phrase «articles argues for»

I'm glad Markham raises the question of whether First Things welcomes articles arguing for the validity of «lifelong, monogamous gay relationships.»

One of them — in fact, the lead one in the article arguing for the soul's subsistence — is quite inextricably bound up in Aristotle's very crude physiology of perception.

Lewis Ford and Marjorie Suchocki in a joint article argue for the first meaning (reenactment of subjective immediacy).

I was saddened and also taken aback by Dr. David Instone - Brewer's article arguing for a re-framing of the Christian position on abortion.

If you're looking for good, clear military cases for and against building more F - 22s, you can't do better than checking out Mark Bowden's Atlantic Monthly article arguing for more and Fred Kaplan's very effective Slate.com response (Kaplan in a nutshell — it's hard to imagine too many geopolitical scenarios in which our having an extra 20 % of this one particular type of aircraft is going to make enough of a difference to justify the cost of building them).

Focusing on the complex and malleable figure of Lara Croft, this article argues for the continuing need to critically analyse gender in digital cinema and cyber-culture.

More on Environmental Journalism: Metcalf Institute Diversity Fellows Announced Article Argues for Press Freedom to Stop Climate Change Has Green Journalism Jumped the Shark?

More on the media and climate change: Both Scientists and Media To Blame For Climate Change Miscommunication: Elizabeth Kolbert Article Argues for Press Freedom to Stop Climate Change

Law professor Ben Trachtenberg (U. of MO School of Law) has even written a law review article arguing for it, which Bloomberg Law summed up in a corny motivational - corporate - retreat - style video.

This article argues for the recognition of the importance of talk among parents and teachers both as a research methodology and as a desirable outcome in creating and sustaining democratic communities that support school improvement.

Not exact matches

Johnson's Telegraph article, published last Friday, argued Britain should not have to pay for access to the EU's single market — a tariff - free trading bloc for goods and services.

In «It's not complicated,» an article published in the RMA Journal last March that will be turned into a full - length book due for release next year, Nason argues that the ongoing troubles in financial markets are in fact more akin to a complex problem.

In 1999, Warren Buffett wrote an influential article for Fortune arguing that corporate profits as a share of GDP tend to go far higher after periods where they're depressed — and drop sharply after they've been hovering at historically high levels.

However, Mr. Sarlo argues misleading reports and articles are influencing and misleading the very public who vote for politicians.

In early April, Joe Nocera, a business columnist for The New York Times, wrote an interesting article in which he argued that SRI researchers oversimplify the world so that investors will feel that that they're safely invested in «good» companies.

In a May 28, 2001 article in The Report magazine, Harper argued in favour of swapping Canada's parliamentary system for a congressional system with an unelected cabinet:

We have argued in previous articles that spending by governments on public infrastructure that would provide services to Canadians for many decades in the future is not the same as spending by governments on programs and services that only benefit current generations.

While some rights holders have argued that the standard for a substantial is very low (the National Post recently argued in a case that «even the reproduction of a small number of words in a newspaper article can be an impermissible reproduction»), the Copyright Board says that its preliminary view is that «copying of a few pages or a small percentage from a book that is not a collection of short works, such as poems, is not substantial.»

He has talked it up, writing an article for Time magazine arguing that its data analysis ability could make traffic jams obsolete — not to mention the $ 1 billion that Apple invested in the firm.

The Globe and Mail, in a front page article entitled «Consider This» argued that the political «parties should commit to holding the line on EI premium increases» [1] They argued that EI premium rates are going up by 15 cents per $ 100 of insurable earnings for every future year and that this is a significant hit on incomes and pocketbooks.

In this recent article for Forbes, Anthemis Founder and CEO Nadeem Shaikh argues a «paradigm shift towards financial wellness is now possible thanks...

They point to an article that you wrote in March, I think, of 2012 in Policy Options, where you basically said, dirty oil, the tar sands it's called, dirty oil and the future of our country, where you argue that the development of the, as you use the word, tar sands, it's become a political term, by the way, as you know, is basically not necessarily good for the country, in fact it takes jobs away in the manufacturing sector of Ontario.

On April 20th a Wikipedia editor named «Foxyjim» tried to change the name to «Bcash» and argued the name was acceptable for the BCH - focused article and Wikipedia standards.

Martin Wolf has produced a series of great articles on Brexit for the Financial Times, where he argues that, although the UK runs a significant trade deficit vis - à - vis the Rest of the EU («rEU»), UK exports to rEU still account for almost 50 % of total UK exports (exhibit 2).

Renting, rather than owning a home, has positive implications for labor mobility, argues Harvard professor Jeffrey Frankel in a May 29th article posted on the Project Syndicate website, headlined «The Case Against Subsidizing Housing Debt.»

Demand for diamonds is a marketing invention, argues Rohin Dhar in a Priceonomics article.

And those that don't say that stuff instead opting to argue and dissect and article or argument for / about god doesn't show they make any positive claims to the existence of such a being, but instead to show how ridiculous and irrational somethings are.

In this article I will argue that Hartshorne accepted rationalism in its extreme form because of methodological problems which an appeal to broadly conceived experience can cause for an advocate of the universalistic ideal of knowledge.

In an article for Haaretz (subsequently picked up by the über - aggregator The Huffington Post), Mira Sucharov reopens the «particularism vs. universalism debate,» arguing the utter superiority of universalism and the foul depravity of particularism in strident terms «even to the extent of invoking everyone's favorite debating tactic: tying the other side to Hitler.

In an article, «Hartshorne on Describing God» (MTh 3/2), I argued that while we can appreciate Hartshorne's reasons for wanting to talk about God in a positive and literal manner, there are certain problematic areas in Hartshorne's own God - talk.

In this short, undocumented and simplistic article White argues that the root of the entire problem lies in «the Christian maxim that nature has no reason for existence save to serve man.

The creation.com article has defects with respect to the reference to Behe's work (which ironically argues for multi-residue protein mutations occurring all the time), but with respect to the Lenski 2008 article, as hypothesized mechanisms they are not «incorrect»; however, neither are they «correct.»

The scientists involved then asked some of their subjects to do things that might change their beliefs, like write a paper arguing for the other side» the article mentions capital punishment» and found that people tend to change their beliefs and at the same time change what they thought were God's beliefs.

From its initial announcement, the Peters Projection has been surrounded by controversy: in over 40 articles on the subject, cartographers have vigorously denounced a number of Peters's claims for the map, while he and his supporters have argued that his is the only world map that meets the concerns of people interested in social issues.

In a peculiar article at The Huffington Post, Rossano argues that scientific evidence for the existence of God is fatal to both the faith of the atheist and the believer:

For starters, the article is largely attacking a straw man: Those of us who believe we are indeed in a new cold war do not argue that Russia is the Soviet Union or is trying to recreate it.

Yesterday, columnist Eduardo Porter, writing for The New York Times, published an article arguing that the «most surprising aspect» of Trump 2016 «may be what it says about the waning place of religion in American politics.»

This article is arguably hypocritical as well as stomach - churning, since it begins with the suggestion that «Because of the amazingly diverse multicultural contexts in which pastoral ministers are called upon to work today, it is impossible to prescribe one liturgical model that will be always and everywhere appropriate»: this flexible and open - minded liturgist then proceeded to argue in The Tablet that only the Mass of Paul VI is always and everywhere appropriate and that its very existence automatically abrogated all previous liturgies for ever: presumably those who prefer the older form are not to be given the dignity of a group or «culture» to be catered for by his free and easy multicultural ways, but are to be simply dismissed as a bunch of liturgical perverts.

Written by Gary Cass, the article was entitled «Why I Am an Islamaphobic» and then proceeded to not only argue that it is impossible for any Muslims to come to Jesus, but that the only way to «deal with» our Muslim neighbours was to deport them, sterilize them, or take up arms against them.

Further, the excuse for his message as presented in this article — that he preaches a watered - down version of Christianity (some would argue that his teaching does not reflect Christianity at all) to attract people to churches — is fundamentally flawed.

In a recent Washington Post article, for example, Congressman Tom DeLay (R., Tex.) argued that a lack of religion was the explanation for the recent shooting of one six - year - old by another.

Now, it could be argued that Labeouf deserves credit for at least apologizing to Baldwin, but plagiarizing an apology from an Esquire magazine article (and then tweeting a picture of it, remember) makes you wonder what on earth was going on.

«Employees who face work requirements incompatible with their faith, and have the option of resigning and seeking alternative employment, can not claim for a breach of Article 9» of the European Convention on Human Rights, Britain will argue.

In her very complex but well - argued essay, she shows how the claim for epistemic knowledge - which, in the context of this article, would link it to the efforts to «politicise identity» or to use identity «strategically» - assumes a single centre of authority and also assumes making use of the language and tools of this authority.

Mack B. Stokes, in an article entitled «The Non-theistic Temper of the Modern Mind,» argues that the most effective countermeasure for a world of unbelief «can best succeed with the aid of personalistic modes of thought which are informed and enriched by some of the insights of Whitehead and Hartshorne.

In an article in Lutheran Forum, I argued that male headship was not natural law, as Luther thought, but rather a cultural cloak for the law that calls for order in the home.

In many books and articles over the years, I have argued that Whiteheadian societies, while not possessing agency in and of themselves, nevertheless possess an objective ontological unity from moment to moment in virtue of the collective agency of their constituent actual occasions2 The unity thus achieved is in my view the unity of an ongoing structured field of activity for successive generations of actual occasions undergoing concrescence within the field.

Drug laws have also fostered drug - related murders and an estimated 40 percent of all property crime in the U.S. Ethan A. Nadelmann, whose article «Drug Prohibition in the United States» in the September 1, 1989, issue of Science has been a major catalyst for public discussion of legalization, argues that «the greatest beneficiaries of the drug laws are organized and unorganized drug traffickers.

Consider the tremendous response to the Atlantic article (April 1993) in which Barbara Dafoe Whitehead argued that the two - parent family is better on the whole for child - rearing than are single parents and stepfamilies.

Appreciate the article for what it is, criticism is reasonable, but arrogance isn't going to win your argument when you belittle the other side because (1) the issue (in this case, Christianity) has been argued for centuries and isn't going to be settled by your argument here, and (2) the more arrogant you are, the worse your ideas look.