Sentences with phrase «articles as a rebuttal»

I love these articles as a rebuttal to the: «but all Dr. Tuteur does is take the cdc data and use it to support her claims.

Not exact matches

The only rebuttal to this that I have found from anti-bedsharers comes from a quote in an article on SIDS and weather, done by researchers in Taiwan, and it is as follows:

Mr. Amidu in a rebuttal, however indicated, that he wrote those articles in his capacity as a Ghanaian citizen to «defend the right to representation and free and fair elections.»

As John has clearly explained in his rebuttal of Don's previous article, this so - called «free movement» is nothing but `... the working classes of the world having to constantly uproot themselves from their communities to pursue ever more mobile capital's job markets all over the globe!

Shermer's article is a shallow and tendentious treatment of a complex subject that does not take proper account of rebuttals to critical attacks on the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, in which a comet strike more than 12,000 years ago caused the megafaunal extinction in North America, and misrepresents the state of the argument around my theory that this event wiped out an advanced human society as well.

This prompted Chris Roberts to write a lengthy rebuttal as he addressed many points brought up in the article.

If other climate bloggers are interested in allowing their existing articles to be used as advanced rebuttals to skeptic arguments, please contact me - I'd love to talk with you!

This means there are now 3 levels of rebuttals addressing the skeptic argument «humans aren't causing global warming»: If other climate bloggers are interested in allowing their existing articles to be used as advanced rebuttals to skeptic arguments, please contact me.

I'll tend to use points raised in the article as a jumping off point for general musings, rather than a detailed rebuttal since I haven't read the book that Sheehan is discussing.

Some of the arguments you raised here were put forth in the skepticalscience article as well as a well thought out rebuttal on American Thinker toward the end of the comments (right above where you recently commented).

While we don't necessarily share the Senator's view of the article on the whole (we felt it provided a relatively balanced discussion of the details and conclusions of the study in question), we do find some concern in the fact that the views of Myron Ebell (who actually works for the «Competitive Enterprise Institute», and not the more venerable «American Enterprise Institute» referred to by the Senator), were offered as a rebuttal to the conclusions of a team of respected scientists.

I know that it would be quite a burden to ensure that every WUWT article has a rebuttal here (or somewhere linked) as that is quite a prolific site but I think it should be done.

Thursday, July 24, 10:49 AM: Monckton responds with the «rebuttal» article, as he posted to his website and Eli linked to above, with my article included in full, and a prefatory statement that it was from «Dr. Arthur Smith, American Physical Society», which was not in the original.