Sentences with phrase «articles backing this claim»

Well then, cite for us exactly the peer reviewed journals and articles backing this claim of yours.

Not exact matches

Back in 1994 a financial planner named Bill Bengen read an article in a popular financial magazine claiming that the «safe withdrawal rate» for a retiree was 6 percent.

For example, if a columnist has an article deadline approaching, and their column is relevant to your client, but they need a source for a quote or to back up a claim, think about how you may be able to connect your client as the source.

Seems to me you claimed a few articles back that you had definitive proof yet I don't recall seeing same.

Here's the back story: Ever since the «Bhut Jolokia» first caused a media - induced ruckus because Indian plant scientists were claiming the title of the «World's Hottest Pepper,» we've been tracking developments on the SuperSite (see a list of related articles at the bottom).

The former England and Arsenal goalkeeper claims that they «need» a centre - back added this summer, but claims that it is not because they were bad last season, which could be debated...... Read the full article here

First of all, my comment about him being responsible for many of the goals we conceded last season against those 3 top teams is true, because I did an in depth article about it and reviewed the replays extensively for each of of those goals — I always back my claims up with stats or fact.

Football finances were back in the news this week; firstly, with a report by a company called Vysyble claiming that football was heading for financial disaster and secondly, a contradictory upbeat article in the Evening Standard trumpeting the fact that London was leading the charge in the game's unstoppable revenue growth.

Back in 2011, we published an article amidst claims that David Moyes was being lined up to replace Harry Redknapp and at the time, it provoked a record number of comments.

In the Guardian article about the potential Bellerin to Juve move, it claims the Arsenal right back has come to question his career direction and that he wants a new challenge.

After Honigstein's comments on the TFSP there have been a number of articles claiming that Arsenal are going to go back in for Forsberg this summer.

Bensonhurst Bean article on BP Adams joining local elected officials in urging the City's Build it Back program to extend deadlines for homeowners impacted by Superstorm Sandy to file claims.

Why not write back politely to the same list with a link to a credible article debunking the claim?

«In his role as executive director of the super PAC, Mr. (Rob) Cole disingenuously (to say the least) claimed in October that NY Jobs Council hadn't decided which candidate to back in the 19th District, but said, «We know Mr. Faso is not going to be our chosen candidate,»» the complaint states, citing a Middletown Times Herald - Record article from Oct. 17.

Backing his claim with Article 13 of the Constitution which says «no person shall be deprived of his life intentionally except in the exercise of the execution of a sentence of a court in respect of a criminal offence under the laws of Ghana of which he has been convicted,» the caucus leader and Minister for Parliamentary Affairs said, «I do not think that the constitution, in so far as a matter is criminal, frowns upon the use of force to the extent that it may even deprive some other people of their lives.

Mark Jacobson pushed back with this article, published in the same issue of PNAS: «The United States can keep the grid stable at low cost with 100 % clean, renewable energy in all sectors despite inaccurate claims»

Where are your sources to back up your claims in this article?

I agree there are holes in the science of FOK, but this article (with it's shoddy resources to back up it's claims) & it's commenters just proves how backward minded 99 % of the population is.

I'm learning to beware of any article failing to cite scientific research to back up their claims.

The problem with this particular article is there is no context to what is too much and zero science backing any of these claims up.

Thanks to this article, I now have more info back up my claims.

You know, I need to further discredit your specious «devil's advocate» claims, you need to be taught that other journalists have exposed this phone «church» in the past, both on television (on newsmagazine shows like 20/20 and several others) AND in print, as with the legendary articles published in Newsweek and the NYTimea that really broke new ground, back in the 80's and 90's.

Claims started circling via an article from The Hollywood Reporter back in June that Bourne Legacy «s Tony Gilroy would be taking over Rogue One reshoots as it's director from Gareth Edwards.

A while back, there was an article in the Hartford Courant, of all places, that claimed to do a follow - up on the college - acceptance rate of Achievement First and its twin, the Amistad Academy.

Croatia has fought back at a warning by the UK's Foreign Office that tourists visiting the country should be aware of threats from organized crime.The Croatian government has claimed the judgement along with an article by the BBC were deliberately malicious and timed to coincide with the start of its main tourist season.

Rather than report every article in a scientific journal or evry press release by an interrested party, perhaps preliminary studies and those with little science to back the claims should be put on the back burner until more information is obtained.

He references this AMEG nonsense, presents it as valid science (although it is the furthest thing from), grossly exaggerates articles to make a point, and claims utter nonsense (6 °C by 2050, more than 100 % more than any credible institution predicts under any scenario) and never backs up his claims with numbers (especially his feedbacks, apart from the AMEG / methane stuff).

Richard, If you go back to the exchanges with Ryan O'Donnell, Jeff «Id», and others at Real climate after Steig et al's Nature cover article (and its claim of nearly uniform Antarctic warming), you will see the same kinds of dismissive, hostile comments from the RealClimate crew, at least in the comments they didn't later «disappear» to make themselves look better, as Nic and PaulK got in this case.

I actually commented on the «The Australian» article a few days back, pointing out the Lords lack of qualification to make his claims, but all comments are vetted and mine was obviously deemed not worthy of inclusion.

On the day Steffen's opinion piece appeared, this newspaper republished Matt Ridley's article in The Times claiming «the Earth is very slowly slipping back into a proper ice age».

IPCC reviewer and climate researcher Dr Vincent Gray, of New Zealand, an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports going back to 1990, author of more than 100 scientific publications and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of «Climate Change 2001,» declared «The claims of the IPCC are dangerous unscientific nonsense» in an April 10, 2007 article.

«Nullius in Verba» writes in to contest the article's claim that «This pattern of a warming surface and a cooling upper atmosphere is due to an enhanced greenhouse effect: since more heat is trapped near the surface, less is radiated back up through the stratosphere.»

His problem is going to be to find articles in respected, peer - reviewed climate science journals that back any of the claims he makes in his posts.

Well, it looks like the press release was carefully worded, and referring back to Anthony Watts article on his blog which is criticized at the beginning of the RC article, i see no wrong claim there... Hiss main argument is written in bold: «The IPCC is under scrutiny for various data inaccuracies, including its claim — based on a flawed World Wildlife Fund study — that up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically and be replaced by savannas from even a slight reduction in rainfall.»

It wasn't clear why the original article (published to a little - known web site) had been removed, but even that original walked its headline claim back a few lines into its text:

A good writer can back up claims of publications merely by sending you copies of articles or directing you to links where they are featured.