Perhaps a better approach would be for the LSUC to require, as a condition of accreditation, law schools to provide data about the job /
articling performances of their graduates (as the ABA does in the US) in order to give would - be law students full and fair disclosure as to what their likely outcomes are.
Not exact matches
Among his many academic achievements, Dino served as Managing Editor
of the Temple Law Review, published a casenote law review
article, was recognized as Dean's Honor Scholar, earned several distinguished
performance awards in trial advocacy, and was the recipient
of the prestigious Sarah A. Shull Memorial Award which is presented to the Temple Law
graduate demonstrating excellence in legal research and writing.
Their qualifications as law
graduates and passing the bar exams, their
performances during
articling, their skills, abilities for law and the love
of the profession should be what law societies look at to accept them as lawyers... not the university they come from or what the university believes in... like money, religious beliefs, social advocacy, social standing... because they all believe in something we don't all agree with!
Many law
graduates completing their
articles at a law firm may be permanently hired by that firm, depending on the firm's need and the
performance of the
articling student.