Sentences with phrase «articling position with»

But an unpaid articling position with a Community Legal Clinic?

So an unpaid articling position with a private bar law firm would be, in my view, appalling and exploitative.

A PLTC would provide qualified students that are unable to secure articling positions with an alternative route to practice.

Not exact matches

The U.S. government pulled in the email as support for Microsoft's position in the economy, and Buffett later saw his email in a Wall Street Journal article, he shared in an interview with CNBC.

A New York Times article reported that 64 % of positions to be filled last year were in hospitals, compared with only 11 % in 2004.

It would take me ten articles to catalogue all the risks and scams in this emerging space, but to give you the broad strokes here are the critical issues that most savvy people — including those with large positions in crypto — all agree on.

GSAM will look to develop a diversified portfolio of positions in large and medium - sized PE firms active both here and abroad, according to a Bloomberg article citing an unidentified source familiar with the plans.

As mentioned in the article I feel very comfortable initiating small positions to start, with the option to average down should prices tumble.

I have been following the slow and arduous acceptance of author Michael Fumento's central thesis presented in his book The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS and in his series of articles in The New Republic and in Commentary with great interest... So I was extremely pleased to read your editorial position concerning AIDS.

Her position on this matter, as expressed in this article, however, is most definitely not Catholic, and I re-iterate that if she truly believes this, there are other faiths which are consistent with her beliefs, and she should be intellectually honest and choose one of them.

I took issue with that comment as a gross misrepresentation of Hawkin's position on panspe.rmia and you cited an article to prove your point.

I think you might want to brush up on your reading comprehension skills or do more than skim the article as it's pretty clear with at least two of the jobs and fairly clear with the third why he no longer holds the positions he did.

Read the article; disagree with the position and his interpretation of the verses he uses, but I'm not gonna hijack Jeremy's post to discuss it.

It is therefore quite significant that a recent article by Bultmann seems to be by implication a defence of Ksemarm's position against an initial criticism by the Barthian Hermann Diem: Diem had maintained that when all is said and done Käsemann has presented Jesus as only proclaiming «general religious and moral truths» about «the freedom of the children of God», rather than a message in continuity with the Church's kerygma.

However, by the end of the year, the church council forced Calvin to resign his position and leave Geneva because he wanted to force church members to sign his doctrinal statement and articles of church organization (which few people wanted to do), and because he refused to serve communion with unleavened bread on Easter Sunday.

In the article «Mathematics,» reflecting Principia Mathematica, Whitehead was so caught up with Bertrand Russell in the professional development of his scholarship that he affirmed positions that later came crashing down around his feet.

I have read both positions with all the problem verses, including your articles, and yet I remain afraid because I know that I'm still a huge sinner.

I trivially found an article on the web that completely supports the soldier's position and claims that he was threatened with more than just not being part of the graduation ceremony.

He signs the article with his name, position, and location, so I assume this is verifiable.

In response to an earlier draft of this article, however, Neville has insisted that whatever advantage the present interpretation might provide to Hartshorne's position, it would make eternal habits inconsistent with the genuine independence or creativity of feelings.

Now if the true issue is so clearly defined in the article — THE ISSUE OF WHAT THE LOST MUST BELIEVE TO BE SAVED — and I believe it is, and like I said, I can scan my own copy of the article with with notes and numbering in my own handwriting — and if your position on this issue is so Biblically solid, then why do you not deal with the real issue at hand, rather than raising all these sorts of protests and all this fuss about the author that can be directly quashed by quotes from the articles?

This question misstates my position slightly — I don't «encourage evangelicals» to do anything other than minister to other evangelicals — but it does exemplify the conservative Catholic mindset that I most wanted to disturb with my article.

Interesting NYT article just dropped where Josh Harris made a crazy big loan to Jared Kushner (a loan three times as large as any real estate loan that Apollo has in its real estate portfolio) after a meeting at the White House where a potential position in the Trump Administration was discussed with Harris.

i have to agree with @El blaze, this article is irrelevant, if you read the full interview he said he & his family were very happy & love living in paris!why would he leave now that he «s back playing in his favourite position when he stuck for 3 years playing wide??

Arsenal are looking in the market to add some more steel to the defence, with a centre back being just one of many positions on the pitch that need drastic improvements... Read the full article here

Nice article seetsuma... I quite agree with you — arsenal's transfer window is looking good thus far... however I know wenger is not done yet... He wants the league title once more & he knows how to get it... he maintained 4th position with the worst team we've had for a while - now improvement is beginning to crawl its way back yet arsenal fans on here won't just support this man... Pathetic!

4) We need players this summer as simple as that and across the pitch, ready made WC caliber player: CB, DM, ST we can't continue that way and it showed (Coquelin has done fantastic but as I said a few times on other articles a few good games is not enough and this is he's 1st mediocre game - inexperience) 5) Misfiring: chances we get but we fail to convert and put ourselves in a commanding position and that has happen so many times it seems we never learn: Welbeck and Giroud should've done better can't expect Özil, Cazorla and Sanchez even thought he can score to do it (Aguero or Suarez would've put that game to bed with all the chances in the 1st half)

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

I enjoyed reading your article, you have good insight especially on player positions (Chambers CB, Chamberlain RW or even LW to rotate with Sanchez if necessary).

Haha and a new stadium as well too, with lots of car parks, sorry mate our midfield is well loaded barring any major injuries which of course as we know will most definetely happen, all we need is a world class striker (Admin * Cough - article *), centre back, maybe a winger and handle the two other positions which are not that neccesary but could be useful for rotation like the ospina back up position and getting an extra midfielder in Ngolo Kante I love his simplicity and his mobility much much much better upgrade to flamini

JW not for the first time I applaud you with the article you have posted.For all you AKB, s you should note the objectiveness and argument of what JW has said and the rationale he uses to at least understand and consider other fans views, to which of course you are entitled.Me I honestly believe you are Deluded, Outdated and WRONG.Wenger would have had respect if he had gone when he KNEW it was all coming apart.This is not recent this is 7 - 8 seasons ago.But I do sympathise how difficult it must be dragging yourself through these tough tough times on # 9miilion f *** ing a year.All you AKB, s really do need to wake up to the reality of the position we are in and who is responsible for us being there.Who are you going to worship when he finally goes or are you going with him.Pathetic to even try to respond to opinion that is proved by where we are as a club.JW — WE SALUTE YOU

This article reminds me of the one galen wrote comparing ourselves with chelsea I remember someone commenting that the only area we are equal to chelsea is the goalkeeping position and they were ahead of us in all other areas.

I am writing this article before Arsenal and our Premier League rivals like Man City and Leicester City kick off for the first matches of the new year, so the numbers in the statistics I am using to compare our assist king Mesut Ozil with other players doing well in the same position will have changed by tonight.

The only thing I agree with the article is the striking position.

He is doing fantastic... and like you said in the article I'm not going to rate him yet but he is surprising me game in game out... and he can only improve with confidence and the fact this position at the moment is his to lose.

In essence with your expression and articulation was very excellent, your article became an also ran because of lack of supporting facts, and an attempt to perpetuate unfounded positions like, how Wenger approach games, how PG approach games, etc..

My guess is that if Pallotta continued to say nothing about the Alisson - leaving rumors, we'd have had an article criticizing Pallotta for saying nothing and letting the rumors get out of hand, and keeping the team's position «up in the air», and letting the situation get unsettled, and (fill in this blank with whatever crapshot criticism you like to have).

Incidentally, with the article you published a photograph taken two years ago in La Jolla, Calif., with the misleading caption, «West Coast junta, leaders in longcampaign to win due position for the west in USLTA, beams confidently.»

In regards to the article, I think quite a few might not be ready, and it doesn't help with Wenger using players in the wrong positions.

never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise

we have no chance of signing benatia i recently read an article where bayern said they wouldn, t sell him and even if they did benatia said he wouldn, t be against a return to roma for whom he played for, also bayern turned down an offer from juventus to sign benatia first on a season loan (2millions) with a view to buy him, a similar deal to the one they have with kingsley coman between the 2 clubs also juventus have a very good relationship with bayern because of the sale of vidal and loan of coman which put them in a better position than us!!

I must admit I wouldn't have put them among the all time greats to challenge for titles but the essence of the article I understood about using marginal gains to make incremental improvements leading in progression to a higher league position I got, to be honest the team with DiCanio, Cole, Carrick, Sinclair, Lampard, Defoe etc should have been a team challenging for the upper league positions but got relegated would have been a better example to me.

When comparing two sources: one a health blogger with a 30 year old medical degree, now retired, ranting on the Internet and making false claims ABOUT false claims, and the other, a researcher with a current university position, with an article published in a questionable journal, but with legitimate references... whom do you feel wins out on credibility?

I hope that with this article, as a mom - to - be you will be able to have fun while determining which position your baby is in at any given moment.

If you're confronted with this army of one, don't even bother trying to prove your point — she's probably read millions of articles and collected skewed statistics to back up her position.

Since we met with the consultant and since reading this article we have been working with our baby on suck training and on going more slowly with the supplementing and I think we've seen improvement with her tongue position and some slightly better latching.

If it is more uncomfortable to latch with the shield then without the shield, go see my article on «7 steps to latch» to help with better positioning.

This article is laden with inherent biases, ad hominems, and deliberately poor characterisations of positions which the author does not take.

In light of signs that the military council will attempt to entrench its position in the new constitution, the article ends with the following thoughts:

Both of those things are clearly laid out as the position that the EU must take by Article 50, so if he had issues with them he should take it up with Lord Kerr.