The Court Appeal has made it clear in this personal injury case that an award for loss of future earning capacity reflects the exercise of judgment framed by clearly
articulated factual findings.
Not exact matches
The Court essentially ruled that such a threat was conceivable, but that the case had to be «returned to BPH because it did not explicitly
articulate» the facts on which it based this
factual finding.
If the court concludes from the evidence in a particular case that the amount of the award reached through application of the guidelines would be unjust, the court shall enter a written
finding articulating the
factual circumstances supporting that conclusion.