Sentences with phrase «as foi»

I would like the following questions to be treated as a FOI request.
Except that legitimate scientists don't pester for data via legal force, such as FoI requests.
This was developed by Phil Jones at the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia as well as FOI officer David Palmer and Michael Mcgarvie, UEA's Director of Faculty Administration.
Some schools receive parental contributions but the money does not necessarily support their children; as the FOI request found at the web link below shows.
This involves funneling hundreds of millions of state dollars through non-profit development corporations controlled by Kaloyeros that have maintained they are private entities, exempt from transparency measures such as the FOI and Open Meetings laws.

Not exact matches

And in 2004, Sean Holman, who got the Washington documents causing the latest scuffle through an FOI request, wrote about Kinsella's failure to register as a lobbyist.
Dr. Altizer is right in characterizing our refusal to accept this event as «bad faith,» mauvaise foi, as Sartre uses the phase.
I've been a vegetarian for four years now (another five previously as well) and I have an embarrassing habit of tearing up at stupid vegetarian things like when people talk about fois gras or veal meatballs.
Twenty - three state legislatures are already subject to their state FOI laws, as are local legislatures in New York, including the NYC City Council.
Despite endless discussion and Cabinet Secretary Gus O'Donnell's rather creative warning that officials are «working on Brexit plans in their head» to avoid FOI, we found the chilling effect to be a myth (as did a Parliamentary committee).
In 2012 he was a little less enthusiastic, speaking of how FOI can «occasionally fur up the arteries of government» and by 2015 he was referring to it as just another «buggeration factor» alongside judicial review and Health and Safety laws.
They get a very narrow, and negative, view of what requests are received and are prone to view FOI as a «problem» and see it as «abused» by the media.
This also plays into claims that FOI is an alleged resource burden as [some] local councils and police forces have claimed.
The case at the Information Tribunal is occurring in part as a result of a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made by the BHA, asking for this information.
Fort Schuyler officials have used their non-profit status to resist disclosure of records under the FOI Law, as well.
We then asked Freeman, of the state Committee on Open Government, for an advisory opinion as to whether Fort Schuyler was subject to the FOI Law.
The central issue: Was Fort Schuyler's status as a 501 (c)(3) non-profit corporation grounds to exempt it from complying with the FOI Law?
Freeman's conclusion: Fort Schuyler functions as an arm of the government and «there is little doubt that a court will find that it is required to comply with FOI,» he said.
The revelations come as a result of Freedom of Information (FOI) requests submitted to the school by the BHA and other campaigners.
Ministers also announced a review of the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act, as Mr Brown promised a cultural change towards a more open government.
As with this week's other row, over Michael Gove's political advisers using private email channels to circumvent FoI inquiries about their free schools policy, we can see that civil servants have difficult jobs which both politicians and the media can make much harder.
Asked about that, Jones said someone had told him that IPCC was immune to FOI rules but he now acknowledges that as «wrong» (as in incorrect).
It's being touted as more smoking gun evidence that UEA's Jones and colleagues working in climate science conspired to cover up data, engineer which papers made it through peer review, and, most damningly, avoid Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.
The extensive expertise of RWJF in building community capacity to promote health provides a rich opportunity to inform the thinking and work of the FOI community as it grows.
We are creating a model to do just that through our Frontiers of Innovation (FOI) initiative by embracing three core principles: science as a different way of thinking, innovation as a different way of working, and distributed leadership as prerequisite to collective change.
The Harvard Center on the Developing Child («Harvard Center») will work as a partner with Center for Social Science Policy (CSSP) in helping the Skillman Foundation and other Detroit organizations develop a plan for the Frontiers of Innovation (FOI) Leadership initiative.
One of the unique aspects of the TSM, which sets us apart from others who have begun to articulate similar innovation agendas, is our structured approach to providing technical assistance and ongoing support for projects that receive FOI funding, as well as for those whose work with us is funded by other sources.
Building upon the strong infrastructure, favorable climate for innovation, and FOI work - to - date in Washington state, it is clear that among the initial cohort of emerging FOI innovation clusters, Washington state represents the leading edge and is poised to accelerate innovation across sectors as we begin this next phase of work.
To this end, FOI views current best practices as a promising starting point, not a final destination.
Ruth, I'm interested in your answer to fOIS in The City's question, as I share the sentiment expressed there.
The current FOI ruling and the Tate's behaviour leading up to it has served to draw attention yet again to its institutional resistance to openness and accountability — despite Tate director Sir Nicholas Serota's proud boast: «We're a more open organization than any equivalent organization in the world... we're at the forefront of being as open as we possibly can.»
PS While we're on the subject of climate humour, the assertion «I am requesting this information as part of my academic research» that you attached to the CRU FOI spam never fails to make me smile.....
Dave is the man who is supposed to be on the side of the FOI request, but is working as hard as he can to figure out a way to ignore the FOI request.
As I noted in the post, if NASA's FOI response is complete, that Hansen should feel «besieged» by the few inquiries attested in this record is one of the more notable aspects of the incident.
But in the UK we have the ICO to handle such matters and ensure that institutions such as CRU can not evade their FoI responsibilities, and they have made three rulings which have gone against CRU.
Sir Muir Russell is currently conducting an Independent Review of the issues surrounding what has become known as «Climategate» and we very deliberately made our handling of FOI requests part of the terms of reference.
As hundreds, if not thousands of people, know, David Holland had submitted an FOI request (denoted by UEA as 08 - 31) on May 27, 2008, only two days prior to the «delete any emails» request, a request which covered the correspondence between Eugene Wahl and Keith Briffa that Fred Pearce described as «back - channel communications that were a direct subversion» of IPCC policies of openness and transparencAs hundreds, if not thousands of people, know, David Holland had submitted an FOI request (denoted by UEA as 08 - 31) on May 27, 2008, only two days prior to the «delete any emails» request, a request which covered the correspondence between Eugene Wahl and Keith Briffa that Fred Pearce described as «back - channel communications that were a direct subversion» of IPCC policies of openness and transparencas 08 - 31) on May 27, 2008, only two days prior to the «delete any emails» request, a request which covered the correspondence between Eugene Wahl and Keith Briffa that Fred Pearce described as «back - channel communications that were a direct subversion» of IPCC policies of openness and transparencas «back - channel communications that were a direct subversion» of IPCC policies of openness and transparency.
Is it worth someone (possibly Bishop Hill, as he seems to have good ability of extracting the important elements and expressing them plainly) doing a detailed summary of perhaps 4 or 5 key issues arising from Climategate (off the top of my head, I would suggest FOI responses, e-mail deletion, «Hide the decline» and the subversion of journal peer review) and looking at how these fall into the scope of each inquiry and then how the inquiries dealt with these and whether their conclusions can be justified.
But as in the UK, those restrictions only come into force if and when an FOI application is received by that organization, and apply within that organization to documents relevant to that application, and to those who have custody of them.
That email, as Montford points out, carried Holland's FoI number as its subject line.
Acton's Testimony Stringer then asked Acton about Muir Russell's failure to investigate the time - barred FOI offences (an investigation that Acton's Janurary statement had set out as one of the central mandates of the Muir Russell panel.)
People who actually are involved in the controversy [Steve M., Holland, Willis E., etc on one side, Jones, Mann, Briffa, etc, on the other] Involvement might be because of FOI requests or involvement as an IPCC FAR chapter reviewer.
But the real issue here (as noted on CA) is the handling of the FOI request by Ms. Solomon.
Surely, as the person responsible for developing drafting the responses to FOI requests at UEA / CRU it can not (or at least should not, IMHO) include the bias of «protectionism» in favour of those who might be most adversely affected by an honest and transparent response to such requests.
I believe that Nixon referred to that as the «modified limited hang - out option», and I likely would have accepted that... but noooo, he had to deny, deny, deny the FOI to try to cover up the pathetic state of his records... mistake.
Recognizing that a request by me as an individual was likely to be marginalized, I invited Climate Audit readers to show the university that others were concerned about CRU obstruction by submitting their own FOI requests for confidentiality agreements.
I would LOVE to hear George Monbiot reaction, to the new Phil Jones, FOI related email content, as he was very strong worded about Phil Jones — FOI behaviour... the latest emails really clarify this: (extracts)
In any case getting on to the UAE website and looking up all the latest FOI applications about stuff that's come up as a consequence of Climategate 2.0 is a pretty amusing exercise.
Bishop Hill writes: As it becomes clear that there will be a determined step by bureaucrats to neuter the FOI Act by introducing charges, it is increasingly important that the public take steps to nip this activity in the bud.
As the head of Info Policy & Compliance for UAE I'd expect him to be thoroughly across the legals of copyright, data management, confidentiality and FOI.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z