Now, that opinion has been finalized and was issued on June 30
as Formal Opinion No. 2015 - 193.
Not exact matches
«
As we have always explained, advice and recommendations included on goop are not
formal endorsements and the
opinions expressed by the experts and companies we profile do not necessarily represent the views of Goop,» the company said in a statement provided to INSIDER.
«Today's
opinion dismantles the structure of constitutional law that has permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and homosexual unions, insofar
as a
formal recognition in marriage is concerned,» wrote Scalia.
'' «Today's
opinion dismantles the structure of const «i «tutional law that has permitted a distinction to be made between heterose «x «ual and ho «mose «x «ual unions, insofar
as a
formal recognition in marriage is concerned,» wrote Scalia.»
Sen. Brad Hoylman of Manhattan has asked the state Committee on Open Government for a
formal opinion on the Senate's adoption this week of chamber rules that bar the use of cellphones
as recording devices — a prohibition that Hoylman strongly suspects is a violation of state Open Meetings Law.
The New York Public Interest Research Group in November sent a letter asking for a
formal opinion from the Joint Commission on Public Ethics
as to whether political parties should be considered lobbyists under state law.
He did, however, argue that JCOPE's proposal would better exist
as a
formal guidance document than advisory
opinion.
Since only a tiny fraction of Americans has lived through a state constitutional convention in their adult lifetimes, and since Americans are not taught about state constitutional conventions (
as opposed to the federal constitutional convention of 1787) during their
formal schooling (even those such
as myself who received a Ph.D. in American government), Americans approach these referendums starting with a huge knowledge deficit, making local
opinion leaders that much more influential in public debates.
Advocates vowed to continue to press for legislative action, noting that Mr. Schneiderman's interpretation of the law, which came in response to a
formal request for an
opinion from the state comptroller's office, might not outlast his tenure
as attorney general.
A dialogue may also serve
as a preliminary assessment of public
opinion and scientific viewpoints before more
formal deliberations are considered.
The White House will not make a
formal statement about the bill until it is scheduled for debate on the House floor «but you shouldn't take the silence officially up until now
as assent,» Holdren said, adding «I will make clear my personal
opinion that the COMPETES act is bad for science, bad for scientists and engineers, and bad for the federal science agencies that would be authorized by the bill.
Since there is little
formal research backing these experiences, however, doctors» recommendations vary almost
as much
as patients»
opinions.
As Regan et al. [11] explain, the process is an iterative one in which each participant «has
opinions about the expertise and rationality of other members in the group» and «agrees to the
formal consensus process... [and] to compromise their views in light of the views of others.»
Pierre Soulages is a «proposal about post-war abstract expressionism» according to the exhibition organisers,
as well
as a
formal call to reflect upon the
opinions surrounding French art.
It would be a far better use of most scientists and PhDs time who comment on this forum and on others like Open Mind to just STOP wasting YOUR time arguing with idiotic «drunken» deniers, and spend their time much more effectively by scouring the internet for such «events»
as «Gas Fracking reviews by Government» etc etc in all nations across the world and use your education and skills and knowledge and actually make a positive difference to AGW / CC action by sending them a
FORMAL SUBMISSION or offering up YOUR
OPINION and EXPERTISE to be considered in their deliberations.
The new
opinion, Formal Opinion 477 (embedded copy below), updates Formal Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape as well as 2012 changes to the ABA's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly the addition of the duty of technology competence in Model Rule 1.1 and changes to Rule 1.6 regarding client confi
opinion,
Formal Opinion 477 (embedded copy below), updates Formal Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape as well as 2012 changes to the ABA's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly the addition of the duty of technology competence in Model Rule 1.1 and changes to Rule 1.6 regarding client confi
Opinion 477 (embedded copy below), updates
Formal Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape as well as 2012 changes to the ABA's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly the addition of the duty of technology competence in Model Rule 1.1 and changes to Rule 1.6 regarding client confi
Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape
as well
as 2012 changes to the ABA's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly the addition of the duty of technology competence in Model Rule 1.1 and changes to Rule 1.6 regarding client confidences.
The new
opinion, Formal Opinion 477 (embedded copy below), updates Formal Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape as -L
opinion,
Formal Opinion 477 (embedded copy below), updates Formal Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape as -L
Opinion 477 (embedded copy below), updates
Formal Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape as -L
Opinion 99 - 413, issued in 1999, to reflect changes in the digital landscape
as -LSB-...]
See Association of the Bar of the City of New York,
Formal Opinion 2001 - 1 (concluding that information submitted by e-mail to a law firm via the firm's website was unsolicited; simply including an e-mail link on a law firm's website does not amount to an invitation to transmit confidential information); Iowa State Bar Association Op. 07 - 02 (evaluated whether the lawyer said or did anything to prompt the potential client to provide confidential information to the lawyer, noting that a lawyer's «request to contact» is not the same
as a request for information); Massachusetts Bar Association Op. 07 - 01 (concluding that a website is a marketing tool by which a prospective client may identify which lawyers have the expertise necessary to handle a particular case, and that the publication of such information could reasonably lead a prospective client to conclude that, when sending information to the firm via an e-mail link, the firm and its lawyers have implicitly «agreed to consider» whether to form an attorney - client relationship.
in case a Member State or the European Parliament may lodge
formal objections regarding compliance of the HTS with the requirements which it aims to cover (see Article 11 of Regulation n ° 1025/2012), such an objection can not be considered — per se —
as the expression of a «controlled legislative delegation in favour of a private standardisation body»,
as suggested by the AG (see para. 55 of the
Opinion).
ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Formal Opinion 10 - 547: Lawyer Websites September 30 By The American Bar Association «Many lawyers and law firms have established websites
as a means of communicating with the public.
Draft ethics
opinions on cloud computing and other technologies, such
as the North Carolina Bar Association's Proposed
Formal Ethics
Opinion on cloud computing, reference the need for a broadly recognized set of best practices relating to technology; prior to ILTSO, no such document existed.
A prime example is
Formal Opinion 462, in which the ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility concluded that a judge may use social media so long
as that use complies with the Code of Judicial Conduct.
Formal Opinion 2011 - 200, «Ethical Obligations for Attorneys Using Cloud Computing / Software
as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property.»
Additional examples of
opinions covering cloud services are Pennsylvania Bar Association, Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility,
Formal Opinion 2011 - 200, «Ethical Obligations for Attorneys Using Cloud Computing / Software
as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property» (November, 2011) and North Carolina State Bar 2011
Formal Ethics
Opinion 6, «Subscribing to Software
as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property» (January, 2012).
In
Formal Opinion 466, the ABA also opened the door for lawyers to conduct internet searches on prospective jurors
as well
as other parties.
While the text of Rule 2 - 200 appears to require written client consent for the use of contract attorneys, the California State Bar's
Formal Opinion No. 1994 - 138 («
Opinion No. 1994 - 138») sets forth a limited exception to Rule 2 - 200's requirements so long
as three conditions are met.
The culture of the Magistrates» Court, the backgrounds of those who sat
as judicial officers, and the approach to judging reinforced the
opinion that
formal judicial education was not only unnecessary, but actually an affront.
Similarly, lawyers are likely to misinterpret NC 2011
Formal Ethics
Opinion 6 and similar guidance
as giving blanket permission to use cloud services, albeit perhaps after some initial diligence.
The following is the question posed of the ethics committee in Proposed 2011
Formal Ethics
Opinion 6 — Subscribing to Software
as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property:
The North Carolina State Bar published the revised version of its proposed ethics
opinion on the use of SaaS in law practice management on April 21st, entitled, «Formal Ethics Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property&
opinion on the use of SaaS in law practice management on April 21st, entitled, «
Formal Ethics
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property&
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software
as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property».
I would like to respectfully offer comments on the North Carolina State Bar proposed ethics
opinion FEO 6 regarding the use of SaaS in law practice management, entitled, «Formal Ethics Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property&
opinion FEO 6 regarding the use of SaaS in law practice management, entitled, «
Formal Ethics
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property&
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software
as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property».
Upon careful consideration, therefore, we have decided that we will be better able to prioritize our workload and be better able to be responsive to the most urgent and substantial questions raised to the Department, if we do not provide for a
formal advisory
opinion process on preemption
as proposed.
Nonetheless, the reasons set out above
as the basis for our decision not to establish a
formal advisory
opinion process apply equally to these requests.
While
Formal Opinion 11 - 459 correctly identifies the wide variety of security - and privacy - related issues with e-mail, this most recent opinion represents a major departure from the ABA's previous position on e-mail security as outlined in Formal Opinion 99 - 143, which
Opinion 11 - 459 correctly identifies the wide variety of security - and privacy - related issues with e-mail, this most recent
opinion represents a major departure from the ABA's previous position on e-mail security as outlined in Formal Opinion 99 - 143, which
opinion represents a major departure from the ABA's previous position on e-mail security
as outlined in
Formal Opinion 99 - 143, which
Opinion 99 - 143, which states:
For years lawyers have felt e-mail offered a «reasonable expectation of privacy» due to
Formal Opinion 99 - 143, but
Formal Opinion 11 - 459 seems to indicate the ABA is advocating a shift away from e-mail
as a communication method.
The
opinion, titled 2011 Formal Ethics Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property, conclude
opinion, titled 2011
Formal Ethics
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property, conclude
Opinion 6: Subscribing to Software
as a Service While Fulfilling the Duties of Confidentiality and Preservation of Client Property, concludes that:
The Pennsylvania Bar Association's Committee On Legal Ethics And Professional Responsibility has just released
Formal Opinion 2011 - 200, Ethical Obligations For Attorneys Using Cloud Computing / Software
As A Service While Fulfilling The Duties Of Confidentiality And Preservation Of Client Property
Scalability challenges exist due to an increased quantity of actors participating in decentralized networks
as they grow, bringing diverse
opinions on future changes to core codebase, combined with a lack of
formal governance structure that makes it difficult to arrive at consensus in an efficient way.
Backed in many cases by
formal legal
opinions, those companies believed that
as issuers of «tokens» they did not fall within the SEC's remit.
CREA doesn't have a legal
opinion; CREA receives legal advice — the legal validity of which can only be determined through
formal processes such
as the Competition Tribunal.