Sentences with phrase «as gisstemp»

In reality there is a huge diversity of opinion within the skeptic side, like: it's cooling; it's warming (but not as much as GISSTemp says); whatever the temperature is doing, it's caused by cosmic rays, or PDO, or sunspots, or recovery from the LIA...; CO2 is a greenhouse gas (but the feedbacks are negative); CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.....

Not exact matches

The earlier examination at Lucia's and TAV of the effects on results of various forms of the GISSTEMP code by a number of capable people seemed also constructive and useful as well as supportive that given the inputs (the temperature data) the messaging could be replicated and perhaps «validated» in some sense.

There is just as solid physical basis for GISSTEMP as there is for UAH.

Next, the GISSTEMP algorithm will change the estimates of the past as New data for the present comes in.

For example; when I look at a plot of GISSTemp over whatever time frame the graph drawer has chosen to plot, I see what by itself could be classed as a «noisy» function; in that at no point in the function is it possible to predict, deduce, or otherwise project what the value of the function would be after the last point plotted; and that is true no matter where in the function the last point plotted happens to be.

So long as Dr Hansen does not change the algorithm; he can continue to spend budget money extending the plot of GISSTemp till the cows come home; and add no knowledge to our understanding of planet earth.