Sentences with phrase «as gus»

As the GUS cohort is spread across two school year groups, at the point of sweep 4 data collection around one third of the cohort had started their first term in primary two.

Including more context to the event in large - scale surveys such as GUS can only enable researchers, policy makers and practitioners to understand these events in more detail.

STARRING Shailene Woodley as HAZEL Ansel Elgort as GUS Nat Wolff as ISAAC Laura Dern as FRANNIE Sam Trammell as MICHAEL Willem Dafoe as VAN HOUTEN Lotte Verbeek as LIDEWIJ

Statistically, the low R2 indicates noise in the system, also apparent as GUS activity without the ligand and stochastic fluctuation.

Not exact matches

I would rather watch Chuck vs Tito 3 in LHW than any other UFC LHW bout not including DC / GUS as contestants..

(A) GUS activity with and without 10 µm of the TNT ligand in paired leaves from transgenic plants serving as negative controls and transgenic plants containing the complete signal transduction system.

As such our detector plants are approximately 100-fold better (GUS data) or equivalent (de-greening response) to the detection abilities of dogs.

Linear regression of GUS activity as a function of ligand (TNT) concentration (n = 214; F = 21.12; P = 3.9 × 10 − 93; R2 = 0.09).

GUS «Accept» loans that have adverse credit accounts selected as «omit» by the underwriter do not require a documented credit waiver to be submitted to RD. Lenders are responsible to retain documentation provided by the applicant to support their data entries in GUS.

Specialists suspected Max suffered from autoimmune skin disease, such as pemphigus foliaceus (pronounced pem - fi - gus foal - ee - aa - shus) but could not prove it conclusively on any tests.

Processed Conventional loans for sale in the secondary market; Proficient in underwriting systems such as LP, DU, GUS, FHA Total Scorecard And VA Automatic.

Growing Up in Scotland's (GUS) longitudinal study, which recently looked at 2,593 families with a child aged 10 years old, found that father - child relationships were equally important to the wellbeing of children as mother - child relationships.

Albeit based on older children than in GUS, children aged 13 to 14 years who live in families with five or more problems (such as neither parent in work, poor housing conditions, parents with mental health problems) are 36 times more likely to be excluded from school than children in families with no problems and six times more likely to have been in care or to have contact with the police (HM Treasury and DFES, 2007).

Our apparently contradictory GUS finding may reflect measurement of events over a longer time period, and their impact on children's feelings, rather than on parenting behaviour - especially as our measures of parent - child relationships (unlike those in the UK Millennium Cohort Study) are child - reported, and involve older children.

Previous analysis of GUS showed that toddlers were much more likely than babies to require NHS treatment or advice as a result of accidents, as were a slightly higher percentage of boys than girls.

Previous analysis of GUS data found that lower levels of household income and greater area deprivation were both associated with a lower activity score for children who were almost 3 years old, although this score included time spent watching television and playing on computers in the activity measure, along with various active behaviours such as running, jumping and ball play (Marryat et al. 2009).

GUS contains information on a range of factors that other research has identified as drivers of child outcomes (Barnes et al., 2010; Barnes et al., 2008; Marryat and Martin, 2010; Jones, 2010).

The longitudinal design of GUS means that for some of these measures it is possible to investigate repeated exposure to risk factors and experience of poor outcomes as well as at single points in time.

25 This is rather a surprising finding, particularly as previous analysis of GUS found persistent low income to be associated with cognitive ability at age 2 - 3 years (Bromley, 2009).

Previous analysis of GUS identified maternal health problems as a significant factor associated with child outcomes (Barnes et al., 2010).

Our GUS finding for family socio - economic disadvantage (as indicated here by lower parental education) ties in with the negative effect of low family socio - economic status on the quality of both mothers» and fathers» relations with three year - old children in another large birth cohort, the UK Millennium Cohort Study (Malmberg & Flouri, 2011).

First we should reiterate that our measure of poverty may not be precise, most notably because GUS collects income information using just one question rather than as part of a detailed exercise.

As can be seen from the discussion in section 3.4 below, and from Figure 3â $ «A, this range is reflected in the GUS data.

As the discussion above notes, recognition of the importance of early childhood experiences has gained prominence in recent years and consequently there is increasing interest in the potential for screening children at an early age for factors such as their meeting of developmental milestones, readiness to learn, or for emotional, social or conduct disorders, all of which GUS routinely includeAs the discussion above notes, recognition of the importance of early childhood experiences has gained prominence in recent years and consequently there is increasing interest in the potential for screening children at an early age for factors such as their meeting of developmental milestones, readiness to learn, or for emotional, social or conduct disorders, all of which GUS routinely includeas their meeting of developmental milestones, readiness to learn, or for emotional, social or conduct disorders, all of which GUS routinely includes.

As outlined in the previous section, a substantial minority (16 %) of ten year - old children in GUS couple families perceive low levels of supportiveness from fathers, and are categorised as having a «poor» father - child relationshiAs outlined in the previous section, a substantial minority (16 %) of ten year - old children in GUS couple families perceive low levels of supportiveness from fathers, and are categorised as having a «poor» father - child relationshias having a «poor» father - child relationship.

As acknowledged above, because of the eligible dates of birth in the original sample design, children in the GUS cohort are spread across two school year groups.

The scale does not have thresholds defining whether a score suggests the presence of a psychiatric disorder, so we have followed the approach taken in a previous GUS report (Marryat and Martin, 2010) and defined a relative threshold below which we classify mothers as having «poor» mental health (16 % of mothers were in this category in 2009/10), as opposed to «average or good» mental health.

The analysis draws on earlier sweeps of GUS BC1 data from sweep 1 (child aged 10 months) to sweep 7 (child aged 8), as well as a «between sweep» web and telephone survey conducted when children were 9 years old.

The percentage estimated as meeting physical activity guidelines (62 %) is similar to the 68 % of all 2 - 4 year olds and 75 % of 5 - 7 year olds reported meeting the guidlines in the 2008/09 Scottish Health Survey, although there were some differences in the questions used between GUS and the Scottish Health Survey.

The limited comparison possible between the first and second GUS birth cohorts suggested a decrease in the proportion of parents with negative feelings about parenting, such as incompetence, resentment, impatience and irritation.

GUS can also identify factors associated with resilience including policy interventions such as engagement with parenting support services.

Evidence from the GUS study has already been used to inform the development of the strategy and the study is well placed to consider the impact of the strategy on children and parents as the commitments within in it are implemented across Scotland.

USDA has set 29/41 % as the max DTI, but often allows up to 47 % with a GUS automated approval and a FICO score over 660.