Not exact matches
Perth IT company Ajilon has proven itself
as a reliable provider to the
justice and
law enforcement arena
as the Western Australian department of the Attorney General awards it a successive five year
By contrast, Delaware Chancery Court Judge Leo Strine, now chief
justice of the state Supreme Court, wrote in the Wake Forest
Law Review: «Corporate law requires directors, as a matter of their duty of loyalty, to pursue a good faith strategy to maximize profits for the stockholders.&raq
Law Review: «Corporate
law requires directors, as a matter of their duty of loyalty, to pursue a good faith strategy to maximize profits for the stockholders.&raq
law requires directors,
as a matter of their duty of loyalty, to pursue a good faith strategy to maximize profits for the stockholders.»
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in her opinion that the
law «shelters employees of private contractors that serve public companies, just
as it shelters the public companies» own employees.»
Uber's loss follows an earlier one last year where the Luxembourg - based Court of
Justice of the European Union (ECJ) classified the company
as a transport service rather than a digital one, which stripped it of protections against undue national regulation that digital services enjoy under EU
law.
Perth IT company Ajilon has proven itself
as a reliable provider to the
justice and
law enforcement arena
as the Western Australian department of the Attorney General awards it a successive five year contract.
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, during his daily press briefing, said the Department of
Justice will be the lead on what Spicer referred to
as «greater enforcement» of federal
law concerning adult - use marijuana.
The U.S. Department of
Justice Thursday demanded that RT register
as a Foreign Agent by Monday, under the terms of a
law that was first drafted in 1938 to stop Nazi Germany stoking up trouble in the U.S..
The
Justice Department lawsuit will cite a provision of the U.S. Constitution known
as the «Supremacy Clause,» under which federal
laws trump state
laws.
«
As morally reprehensible as her behavior was, I wasn't convinced that it was manslaughter,» said Daniel Medwed, a law and criminal - justice professor at Northeastern Universit
As morally reprehensible
as her behavior was, I wasn't convinced that it was manslaughter,» said Daniel Medwed, a law and criminal - justice professor at Northeastern Universit
as her behavior was, I wasn't convinced that it was manslaughter,» said Daniel Medwed, a
law and criminal -
justice professor at Northeastern University.
«Andy Puzder is against unions, calls the minimum wage and overtime «restrictions» and employees «extra cost,» and even said he wants to fire workers like us and replace us with machines that can't take vacation or sue their employers when they break the
law,» the nonprofit Interfaith Worker
Justice quoted Rogelio Hernandez, a Carl's Jr. cook,
as saying.
Meeting on the first Monday in October,
as required by
law, the
justices entered the crowded marble courtroom for the first time since their momentous decision in late June that upheld President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.
As a textualist largely in the mold of late Supreme Court
Justice Antonin Scalia, Gorsuch has frequently advocated for interpreting
laws based solely on text, regardless of the desirability of the outcomes.
And
as president, I will bring the full weight of the
law to bear and making sure those who kill police officers are brought to
justice.
While
law enforcement attitudes toward legalizing marijuana seems to have relaxed, the nation's top
justice officials have not changed their stance on marijuana
as an illegal drug.
In an interview
as her tenure ends, Lynch strongly defended the
Justice Department's aggressive intervention in local
law enforcement during the Obama administration, including the decision to repeatedly seek court - enforceable improvement plans with troubled police agencies.
Maksim Zaslavskiy contends the currencies did not qualify
as securities under federal
law and so the Department of
Justice lacked jurisdiction to bring the charges.
He previously was a partner at the
law firm of O'Melveny & Myers, a deputy general counsel at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Department, and senior counsel at the
Justice Department.John Roth joined the firm
as chief compliance and ethics officer, with responsibility for ensuring that the company remains in compliance with the evolving legal landscape.
Conheeney thanked employees for their hard work and urged them to stay focused, and the attorney directed them to the Department of
Justice's website for more information on the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
law, known
as RICO, the people said.
Justice Douglas» opinion struck that
law down
as inconsistent with a Constitutional right of privacy, notwithstanding that the U.S. Constitution nowhere mentions any such right, let alone even using the word «privacy».
In September, Roskomnadzor warned CNN International over alleged violations of Russian media
law.101 In October, the Ministry of
Justice warned Radio Svoboda and Nastoyashcheye Vremya — the Russian - language outlets of U.S. - funded Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFE / RL)-- about the possibility of being designated
as foreign agents.102 These warnings were apparently aimed at preparing a legal basis for countermeasures if the United States required Kremlin mouthpieces RT and Sputnik to register
as foreign agents under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
RT was in fact forced to register in the United States in November, and Russia passed a
law that month allowing foreign agent status to be conferred on media outlets.103 In December the Ministry of
Justice designated Voice of America and eight media outlets associated with RFE / RL
as foreign agents.104
The John R.
Justice Student Loan Repayment Program provides up to $ 10,000 per year of
law school loan repayment for state and federal public defenders and state prosecutors who agree to remain employed
as public defenders and prosecutors for at least three years.
As per reports, the country's Justice Department has already started discussing ways to bring bitcoin under its AML Laws so as to bring forth more transparency with crypto dealings and reduce the chances of it being used for money launderin
As per reports, the country's
Justice Department has already started discussing ways to bring bitcoin under its AML
Laws so
as to bring forth more transparency with crypto dealings and reduce the chances of it being used for money launderin
as to bring forth more transparency with crypto dealings and reduce the chances of it being used for money laundering.
In its complaints to the
Justice Department and the FEC last month, Common Cause argued that the alleged payment to Daniels likely violated federal campaign - finance
laws as an unreported, in - kind donation to Trump's campaign.
In its complaints to the
Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Common Cause argues that the alleged payment to Stephanie Clifford, whose stage name is Stormy Daniels, likely violated federal campaign - finance
laws as an unreported, in - kind donation to Trump's campaign.
And should the Supreme Court be unwise enough to impose same - sex marriage on the whole country, the decision will be greeted not like Loving v. Virginia (overturning antimiscegenation
laws in 1967),
as an achievement of obvious
justice, but like Roe v. Wade, with a tireless movement dedicated to overturning its obvious injustice, and a reinvigorated effort to pass a federal marriage amendment.
If someone is guilty of a crime in this litany of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized
as the
law dictates to include jail terms for pe - dophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms for obstruction of justice (Clinton, Cardinal Law, Bevilacqu
law dictates to include jail terms for pe - dophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms for obstruction of
justice (Clinton, Cardinal
Law, Bevilacqu
Law, Bevilacqua?)
Laycock's hypothesis ripened into full - blown suspicion by June 2000 when
Justice Stevens took the position that the free speech rights of the Boy Scouts were not violated by a state
law requiring them to employ an avowed homosexual
as an assistant scoutmaster.
If someone is guilty of a crime in this litany of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized
as the
law dictates to include jail terms for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms for obstruction of justice) Clinton, Cardinal Law), jail for embellizing / money laundering (the topic rabbi) and the death penalty or life in prison for murder («Kings David and Henry VII
law dictates to include jail terms for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms for obstruction of
justice) Clinton, Cardinal
Law), jail for embellizing / money laundering (the topic rabbi) and the death penalty or life in prison for murder («Kings David and Henry VII
Law), jail for embellizing / money laundering (the topic rabbi) and the death penalty or life in prison for murder («Kings David and Henry VIII).
Its a sad day when our young black men do nt have the freedom to walk through certain neighborhoods without being harrased are mudered, no one has the right to just take a life just because of the color of your skin we
as a people has to stand up to injustices such
as this no one wants to hear the truth there is still a racial devide in America and our
justice system create
laws so that this kind of injustice can continue to happen rather u want to admit it are not our young black men are the prey.
Giambrone's claims that «
Justice Scalia's legal theory has no ultimate framework for holding the government accountable before God» and that he sees natural
law as merely a «rhetorical cover for the preferred moral agenda of any given judge.»
The best single article I've seen on the moral case for parental choice in education is «School Choice
as Simple
Justice,» published in First Things (April 1992) and written by Prof. John Coons of the
law school of the University of California, Berkeley.
If someone is guilty of a crime in this litany of «neithers» they should or should have been penalized
as the
law dictates to include jail terms for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce and alimony payments for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms for obstruction of justice (Clinton, Cardinal Law, B1
law dictates to include jail terms for pedophiliacs (priests, rabbis, evangelicals, boy scout leaders, married men / women), divorce and alimony payments for adultery (Clinton, Kennedy, Woods), jail terms for obstruction of
justice (Clinton, Cardinal
Law, B1
Law, B16?)
In the jurisprudence
Justice O'Connor has seemingly created, judges can validate
laws by characterizing them
as «preserving the traditions of society» (good); or invalidate them by characterizing them
as «expressing moral disapproval» (bad).
They found that
law enforcement officials were not,
as they had previously thought, dispensers of evenhanded
justice but were often spearheads of a system of injustice.
Yet today, that same thesis is liable to provoke a firestorm
as intense
as when Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas started paying compliments to such extremist and radical notions
as Aristotelian natural
law theory.
Samuel Gross, a
law professor at the University of Michigan and senior editor of the Registry, said, «It's no surprise that in this area,
as in almost any other that has to do with criminal
justice in the United States, race is the big factor.»
In dissent,
Justice Potter Stewart described the Connecticut
law he believed constitutional
as «uncommonly silly»» which, in retrospect, was a phrase he could have used to describe Griswold v. Connecticut, adding «pernicious» to «silly.»
And in such a system,
as Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in 1928, the «existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the
law scrupulously....
It is true that when we enter into society we give up the right to retributive
justice at the personal level, but if the state ignores the retributive aspect of
justice in its application in society, support for that society will erode,
as will respect for it
laws.
The core argument of the book seeks to reassert the role of Christianity
as making a necessary contribution to the construction of ethics that underpin our society and culture, and by extension, our
law - making and
justice system.
In particular, the declaration references the charter's «principles of constitutional contractual citizenship» and «freedom of movement, property ownership, mutual solidarity and defense,
as well
as principles of
justice and equality before the
law,» in regards to Muslims and non-Muslims.
The fact that Islam has permitted individual
as well
as communal discretion — limited only by the original definite legislation of the Qur» an and the Sunnah, which define the roads to
justice — enabled students of the Islamic code to choose freely the
laws regulating the affairs of Islamic society.
It is almost impossible to summarise,
as it moves apparently seamlessly in seventeen pages from the history of natural
law to the development of conscience, the Evangelical Counsels and what he calls «creative
justice».
Dolan's statement framed the issue in terms of social
justice and respect: «Every person deserves to be treated with
justice, compassion, and respect, a proposition of natural
law and American
law that we
as Catholics vigorously promote.»
Today's decision marks the first time the
justices have considered what is widely knows
as «the ministerial exception» to antidiscrimination employment
laws.
As for my part, I am filing a complaint with the Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice and asking her and The Court to mark Tony Jones as a Vexatious Litigant in that state (he has to get judicial approval to sue); asking The Court to take action against Tony Jones» attorney's (M. Sue Wilson's) law license; and asking the Court to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue Wilso
As for my part, I am filing a complaint with the Minnesota Supreme Court Chief
Justice and asking her and The Court to mark Tony Jones
as a Vexatious Litigant in that state (he has to get judicial approval to sue); asking The Court to take action against Tony Jones» attorney's (M. Sue Wilson's) law license; and asking the Court to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue Wilso
as a Vexatious Litigant in that state (he has to get judicial approval to sue); asking The Court to take action against Tony Jones» attorney's (M. Sue Wilson's)
law license; and asking the Court to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (
as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue Wilso
as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former
law partner of M. Sue Wilson.
It is,
as well, an antidote to Mississippi Burning, a dishonest, award - winning new film in which blacks wait patiently and fearfully in the background for deliverance by two white FBI agents, played by Gene Hackman and Willem Dafoe, who zealously bend the
law in the interest of
justice — a film one fears will have a profound effect on the way many Americans view their nation in the King Years («The Dream Dafoed,»
as the Village Voice put it).
«In addition,
as the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change works with the state government to deliver democratic dividends, we urge it to also assist in addressing the challenges to rule of
law posed by these arrests and prosecutions, encouraging respect for press freedom and advocating for protection and
justice for targeted communities in southern Kaduna.»
«When rulers have inverted their functions and enacted wickedness into a
law which treads down the inalienable rights of man to such a degree
as this,» abolitionist minister Theodore Parker of Boston declared after the passage of the Fugitive Slave Bill in 1850, «then I know no ruler but God, no
law but natural
Justice.»