Their textbooks promote nonfactual and revisionist history as well
as Young Earth creationism and climate change denial.
On the other hand, ideas such
as young earth creationism should not be taught as scientifically valid for the very simple reason that they are not.
Not exact matches
@Topher It seems that before Ken Ham started his own project over there at AIG, he worked for the Insti / tute for Creation Research, which basically does the same thing
as the Discovery Insti / tute — namely, try to create a «sciencey» veneer for
Young Earth Creationism.
Im from canada and I know very well that many people here hold to
young earth creationism as well..
In this way,
young earth creationism is demonstrably incorrect
as a theory.
E.g., in regards to scientific support for evolution and rejection of
creationism and the
young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of
creationism, which the brief described
as embodying religious dogma.
As I said earlier today on this blog, it's not «
creationism» that's being rejected per se, but rather «
young earth»
creationism.
My parents never really pushed
young earth creationism on me nor taught that it was a fundamental element of the Christian faith, but for most of my life I travelled in circles where it was assumed that good Christians embraced a literal interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2, which describes the
earth as being created in six days.
Do you feel it's an improvement that many theists are backing away from
Young Earth creationism, and instead viewing evolution
as a divinely ordained process?
Dating is a stage of romantic relationships in humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability
as a G. Brent Dalrymple's classic debunking of the
young -
earth «scientific»
creationism's dating methods with a short explanation of how geologists know the age
G. Brent Dalrymple's classic debunking of the
young -
earth «scientific»
creationism's dating methods with a short explanation of how geologists know the age Dating is a stage of romantic relationships in humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability
as a
Indeed, every single «original» idea from this guy's mouth has turned out to be
as accurate
as the likes of
Young Earth Creationism (aka not in the slightest) and his chances of getting things right seems to be about
as «good»
as the daily horoscope, TV psychics and Micheal Pachter's predictions (aka non existent).