Throughout the book the medical practitioner is the default term, as the authors appreciate that the reader may opt for a physician specialty or midwife
as their birth attendant.
Not exact matches
But the festival appears to have had a pre-exodus history among pastoral folk
as a spring celebration of the
birth of the lambs with
attendant rites for the consecration of the flocks and probably a communion meal shared by the shepherd group and the deity.
The core of the festival - no doubt known by some other name - may well have been much older than the thirteenth century B.C., originating among pastoral people
as a spring celebration of the
birth of the lambs, with appropriate
attendant rites for the consecration and protection of the flocks, and probably a communion meal shared by the shepherd group and its deity.
Just
as when going for a
birth in the hospital it makes sense to check and understand the credentials and mind set of your practitioner, the same is true of any home
birth attendant.
The only numbers out there on UC include ALL unattended
births, such
as precipitous
births, dumpster babies, and any
birth that occurred outside the hospital and in the absence of a professional
birth attendant.
As I could determine, none were required, as no one recognized the home birth - based attendant as a credible member of the healthcare infrastructur
As I could determine, none were required,
as no one recognized the home birth - based attendant as a credible member of the healthcare infrastructur
as no one recognized the home
birth - based
attendant as a credible member of the healthcare infrastructur
as a credible member of the healthcare infrastructure.
We encourage all home
birth practices, many of which we are blessed to have
as readers on our blog, to implement a debriefing strategy with your
attendants.
As a home
birth attendant, most practices contract their assistants rather than employ them and I suspect most home
birth practices are owned by solo practitioners rather than in partnerships or in a team of clinicians.
In my experience, CNMs are all Ina Mae wannabes who revere her
as a patron saint and would gladly attend to home
births with all the
attendant woo and unicorn sprinkles if their CNM licensure did not prohibit them from doing so.
For certified nurse midwives and other midwives, nearly all, 98 % and 99 %, respectively, of home
births were planned home
births, whereas almost two - thirds (65 %) of home
births attended by «other»
attendants were reported
as planned.
Yes, a home
birth with a competent
attendant would be safer than an unattended home
birth or an incompetent
attendant, but it won't be and can't be
as safe
as a hospital
birth.
There are several different surveys related to home
birth and unassisted
birth, including surveys for health practitioners,
birth attendants,
as well
as if you've had a home
birth or unassisted
birth, want to share your thoughts on childbirth literature, intuition in
birth, sexuality in
birth and birthrape.
As your midwife / birth attendant, I should be viewed as a resource and friend who will share your experience of pregnancy and birth with yo
As your midwife /
birth attendant, I should be viewed
as a resource and friend who will share your experience of pregnancy and birth with yo
as a resource and friend who will share your experience of pregnancy and
birth with you.
For example, the fact that 27 transfer patients are listed
as having a physician
as their planned
birth attendant is most likely due to errors in
birth - certificate completion; data are currently lacking to inform the degree of misclassification related to this and others factors that affect the study outcomes.
Inclusion criteria were
as follows: the study population was women who chose planned home
birth at the onset of labor; the studies were from Western countries; the
birth attendant was an authorized mid-wife or medical doctor; the studies were published in 1985 or later, with data not older than from 1980; and data on transfer from home to hospital were described.
Most people don't realize that the consensus from the research shows that homebirth is
as safe
as or safer than hospital
birth for low - risk women with a skilled
birth attendant.
Women who were classed
as not having had a
birth attendant were also excluded.
A skilled
birth attendant is an accredited health professional — such
as a midwife, doctor or nurse — who has been educated and trained to proficiency in the skills needed to manage normal (uncomplicated) pregnancies, childbirth and the immediate postnatal period, and in the identification, management and referral of complications in women and newborns.
When used
as transitive verb the OB, the midwife, the cab driver or whoever is the
birth attendant is the agent, and the woman giving
birth is the patient.
I don't know
as much about the american system and would agree that
birth attendants need adequate training or they do more harm than good!
«Every single country in the European region with perinatal and infant mortality rates lower than the United States uses midwives
as the principal and only
birth attendant for at least 70 % of all
births.»
But I have a big, big problem with
birth attendants misrepresenting their training and abilities and telling expectant parents that home
birth is «
as safe or safer» than hospital
birth when the data shows the exact opposite.
Whatever the studies show for other countries, they show that home
birth is not safest
as undertaken with the available
attendants in the US.
To truly address the reasons why women choose potentially unsafe home
birth situations and
attendants, we need to look
as their — usually unconscious — drive to protect their mental health, when faced with disrespectful, intrusive and abusive medical environments (I'm not saying that all hospitals are like that at all, mine isn't, but it can be a major factor).
Preference to hospital
birth for safety reasons is not found in this book, although research supporting homebirth is also absent and while many of Penny's suggestions were implemented into this book (far beyond her expectations), the third chapter recommends the gynecologist
as the «ideal» practitioner so women can maintain continuity from well woman care to
birth attendant.
The 2nd row shows data on deaths associated with planned OOH
births with direct - entry midwives
as the planned
birth attendants.
As Jennifer Block mentions in her response to the Daily Beast, we know from more than half a dozen large - scale studies carried out in several different countries, including England and the Netherlands (where almost a third of babies are born at home), that planned home birth with competent attendants is as safe as or safer than hospital birt
As Jennifer Block mentions in her response to the Daily Beast, we know from more than half a dozen large - scale studies carried out in several different countries, including England and the Netherlands (where almost a third of babies are born at home), that planned home
birth with competent
attendants is
as safe as or safer than hospital birt
as safe
as or safer than hospital birt
as or safer than hospital
birth.
I see these «
birth attendant doulas»
as having practical knowledge and skills and the understanding of when to transfer to another location and when to handle what is in the moment.
A number of non-invasive, non-pharmocological solutions have been shown scientifically to be
as effective
as active management in lowering cesarean section rates: a companion in labor in the hospital (Thornton and Lilford 1994), midwives rather than doctors
as the principle
birth attendants in hospital
births of women without complications (Wagner 1994), out - of - hospital
birth centers (Rooks et al. 1990), and planned home
birth (Wagner 1994).
And her
birth team included a male midwife
as her backup
birth attendant.
The answer is long and complex, and has much to do with the radical shifts in culture that have occurred over the past 25 years or so, both in Britain and the world: the unstoppable rise of art
as commodity and the successful artist
as a brand; the ascendancy of a post-Thatcher generation of Young British Artists (YBAs) who set out, unapologetically, to make shock - art that also made money; the
attendant rise of uber - dealers such
as Jay Jopling in London and Larry Gagosian in New York; and the
birth of a new kind of gallery culture, in which the blockbuster show rules and merchandising is a lucrative sideline.