[1] The plaintiffs seek to certify their action
as a class proceeding against the Bank of Nova Scotia (the «Bank») and Richard Wilson («Wilson»).
In Gariepy, Justice Nordheimer declined to certify the action
as a class proceeding on the basis that the determination of whether the defendant's products were defective did not significantly advance the overall determination of liability, as there were a myriad of reasons why a class member's plumbing system might fail.
Ontario's Divisional Court conditionally certified the action
as a class proceeding in April 2009, and the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an attempt by Quizno's to stay the proceedings in a June 2010 ruling.
Perell ruled that records relating to J.K.'s crimes and incarceration, which took place when he was a minor, are relevant to his motion to certify the
matter as a class proceeding.
On January 24, 2018, British Columbia Supreme Court certified Nickel v. Weyerhaeuser Company
Limited as a class proceeding and appointed Barbara Sirett and David Biggs as the representative plaintiffs of the class.
A class action, also
known as a class proceeding, is a lawsuit in which one party, or a group of parties, may sue or be sued as representatives of a larger class.
Second, settlements still remain a frequent method for resolving class actions, even where the lawsuit is of dubious merit or, if more stringent criteria were applied, would not be
tried as a class proceeding.
It was certified as a class proceeding [1] in February, 2010 and settled (for the first time) in August, 2014.
4 (1) The court must certify a
proceeding as a class proceeding on an application under section 2 or 3 if all of the following requirements are met:... (c) the claims of the class members raise common issues, whether or not those common issues predominate over issues affecting only individual members;
Stage Two refers to appeals of any order of the court relating to certifying the action
as a class proceeding.
On January 5, 2018, Justice Perell heard the Plaintiff's previously adjourned motion to certify this action
as a class proceeding.
On March 28 and 29, 2017, Justice Belobaba heard the Plaintiff's motion to certify this action
as a class proceeding.
On July 27, 2015, the Federal Court of Canada released its order and reasons granting the plaintiffs» motion for certification of the action
as a class proceeding.
July 27, 2015 The Federal Court of Canada releases its order and reasons granting the plaintiffs» motion for certification of the action
as a class proceeding.
By certifying this action
as a class proceeding, the court has not decided if any of the plaintiffs» allegations are true.
Once an action is certified
as a class proceeding, it proceeds to a common issues trial where a judge resolves the certified issues that apply to all class members.
In certifying the action
as a class proceeding and granting leave to pursue a s. 138 claim, Belobaba J. focused on two aspects integral to asserting the statutory cause of action: the test for leave to pursue such a proceeding, and the requirement under the Class Proceedings Act, S.O. 1992, c. 6, that the pleadings disclose a cause of action.
UPDATE: Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has certified this action
as a class proceeding.
In certifying the action
as a class proceeding, Belobaba J. addressed Manulife's argument that the pleadings did not disclose a cause of action claim in respect of the s. 138 claim because the action was not commenced within three years of the alleged misrepresentations (as required by s. 138.14 of the Act and the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Sharma v. Timminco Ltd., 2012 ONCA 107).
However, Strathy indicated that had he found the limitation period hadn't expired, he would have granted leave and certified the action
as a class proceeding.