Past research shows that individuals more heavily involved on an issue,
such as climate scientists, often tend to view even objectively favorable media coverage as hostile to their goals.
An important fact to remember is that many high profile critics you see in the news do not
qualify as climate scientists when these standards are applied.
This has been most commonly interpreted (among skeptics)
as climate scientists secretly admitting amongst themselves that global warming really has stopped.
In any case, it seems important for scientists to make clear that our political statements are in our roles as ordinary people, not in our
role as climate scientists.
As climate scientists constantly remind us, even if the world successfully implemented a substantial mitigation program today, a much warmer world is already built into the physical climate system.
This has been most commonly interpreted (among skeptics)
as climate scientists secretly admitting amongst themselves that global warming really has stopped.
The boom in unconventional fuels — such as bitumen extracted from Alberta's tar sands and oil extracted from North Dakota's Bakken shale formation by hydraulic fracturing («fracking»)-- has swelled global reserves
even as climate scientists issue ever - sterner warnings that burning more than a small fraction of these reserves would be suicidal.
As climate scientist Michael Mann writes, «Harvey was almost certainly more intense than it would have been in the absence of human - caused warming.»
However,
as climate scientists issue warnings about the severity of unseasonable bushfires, other key public voices actively undermine this message.
As climate scientist Deke Arndt explains in this edition of Tell Me Why, the CEI contains critical information on how are climate is changing and what climate trends we may see.
Its similar to Al Gore, his views are not the same thing
as a climate scientists views, although I do nt share or understand your intense dislike of the guy.
Inasmuch
as climate scientists say that the increase in t (1890) wwT ~ t (2015) wwT is.51 degrees K, it means that humac CO2 contributions or AGWf (CO2) is.0014 x.51 or.000714 degrees k... an almost immeasurable increase.
She babbled on about «the inevitability of world economies making the transition to a low - carbon future» and «the need for politicians to feel the same
urgency as climate scientists about the threats posed by global warming.»
In the interview, Figueres discussed the need for the United States to finally sign on to a global climate treaty, the inevitability of world economies making the transition to a low - carbon future, and the need for politicians to feel the same urgency
as climate scientists about the threats posed by global warming.
«When Mother Nature decided in 1980 to change gears from cooler to warmer, a new global warming religion was born, replete with its own church (the UN), a papacy, (the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), and a global warming priesthood
masquerading as climate scientists.»
Yet as a climate scientist and a climate policy scholar, I know market forces and current policies are far from adequate to limit the rise in global temperatures, as envisioned in the Paris Agreement.
Reducing high - end consumption could have an enormous short - term impact on carbon emissions,
as climate scientist Kevin Anderson is always saying.
Get a sneak peak into a family divided by the fossil fuel
industry as a climate scientist struggles to tell the truth about global warming, his daughter struggles to save the frogs, while his sister wants to frack, with this live reading of excerpts from the upcoming play from the award - winning Three Theatre Collaborative.
A family divided by the fossil fuel industry
as a climate scientist struggles to tell the truth about global warming, his daughter struggles to save the frogs, while his sister wants to frack, with this live reading of excerpts from the upcoming play from the award - winning Theater Three Collaborative.
«The goal we're all
chasing as climate scientists is a way of reversing the impacts of harmful gases on our atmosphere — this technology, which could see those harmful gases not only removed but converted into renewable fuels for use in poorer countries is the Holy Grail of climate science.»
Maybe that wasn't the case some years ago, but the mere scale of the problem and the attacks we have been
under as climate scientists have pushed a number of us outside our labs.»
The Nature article
comes as climate scientists published what they said today was the «best ever» collection of evidence for global warming, including temperature over land, at sea and in the higher atmosphere, along with records of humidity, sea - level rise, and melting ice.