Sentences with phrase «as a court requirement»

NOTE: If you are required to complete traffic school as a court requirement, please check with your court before enrolling in a program.

A Certificate of Completion is also emailed to you which you can submit to the court if you're taking this as a court requirement.

You must NOT have a commercial drivers license (CDL); you must NOT have completed traffic school in the previous 12 months; and if taking the defensive driving course as a court requirement, you must contact the court within 30 days of receiving your citation and ask for permission to attend a traffic school.

Not exact matches

That could prove a perilous prospect for the ACA, based on the High Court's recent ruling in Hobby Lobby, which said that closely - held companies can exempt themselves from key parts of their coverage requirements, such as for birth control products and services, based on their religious beliefs.

And while there is no legal requirement that underwriters like Mr. Thiel reveal their involvement to the opposing side or the jury, it is considered fair game for lawyers to ask questions about financial backing — something that Gawker Media did on Wednesday in court as part of its efforts to overturn the Hogan judgment.

It uses as the basement for law a 1946 Supreme Court box that centered on bonds and the requirement to follow the «Howey Test.»

Olson also invoked «fundamental rights» and was queried by Justice Scalia as to just exactly when it became unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage: 1791 with the Bill of Rights, 1868 with the 14th Amendment, or some other date, perhaps after the Court declined in 1971 to review a Minnesota Supreme Court decision upholding opposite - sex marriage requirements?

In the most recent form of this debate, the courts have ruled that Creation - Science is not science but the propagation of particular religious beliefs, and as such the mandatory requirement of it being taught in public schools violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution.

AA, NA, and the like are acting like they are some elitist «social club» and many who traipse through their doors are only there because there is a court order that lists attendance in the program as a requirement.

As a result, the district court concluded there was not enough evidence for a reasonable jury to find that the employer had violated the FLSA's breastfeeding breaks requirement.

We may need to disclose personal information to meet legal or regulatory requirements, such as under a court order or to a government institution if required or authorized by law.

Bearing this in mind, section 60 (5)(a) could and would, if necessary, be construed and applied by a court or tribunal as permitting preferential decisions on grounds of religious belief, only to the extent that such decisions were consistent with genuine, legitimate and justified occupational requirements.»

However, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that certain ballot access requirements, such as filing fees and submitting a certain number of valid petition signatures do not constitute additional qualifications and thus few Constitutional restrictions exist as to how harsh ballot access laws can be.

The Supreme Court unanimously said that the requirements of parliamentary approval or ratification is to ensure probity, transparency, and accountability as stated in the Preamble to the Constitution.

As reported earlier, on March 26, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that in - district residency requirements for circulators can not be enforced, at least for petitions for minor party and independent candidates.

(3) Neither the Executive Committee nor the County Leader shall designate, nominate or propose any candidate for judicial offices which are to be elected county - wide in New York County, or which are to be proposed for appointment by the Mayor of the City of New York or by the Governor of the State of New York, exclusive of recommendations for interim appointment by the Mayor or the Governor, unless such candidate shall have been approved in that calendar year for such office by the independent panel., except that once a candidate for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court has been reported as highly qualified by at least two of the last four independent screening panels for that office, that candidate shall be considered as having been approved by the panel for such office during each of the four calendar years after the year in which the candidate shall have last achieved such status, (not counting a year in which there are no vacancies for the office of Justice of the Supreme Court other than a vacancy resulting from the expiration of the term of office of a justice eligible for and seeking re-election to that office, or a vacancy which has been filled by an interim Supreme Court justice seeking re-election who has been appointed by the Governor and who satisfies the requirements of sub-paragraph 4 (b), provided in each case that such justice has been determined by the independent panel to merit continuation in office), and such candidate shall not make application to the panel during any of such years unless the Committee on the Judiciary shall require the candidate to make such an application.

Currently, through the use of conflicting and limiting standing requirements and jurisdictional ambiguity, many property owners are left in state courts where the burden is on them to prove not only harm, but a «total loss of use» of their property as a whole.

As the Rokita court noted, voters who lack Photo ID undoubtedly exist somewhere, but the fact that Plaintiffs, in spite of their efforts, have failed to uncover anyone «who can attest to the fact that he / she will be prevented from voting» provides significant support for a conclusion that the Photo ID requirement does not unduly burden the right to vote.

The majority Court opinion appeared to concede the challenger's argument, but held that the individual mandate was as a matter of law a tax on a class of people (those who do not buy insurance), not a statutory requirement of affirmative behavior.

The state Supreme Court ruled that she did not meet the requirements to serve as attorney general, and she was blocked from the ballot.

The issue of admission into the Ghana Law School became contentious following a Supreme Court decision last year which scrapped exams and interviews as entry requirements.

By Sean Ryan As a court battle continues to rage in Milwaukee over paid local sick leave requirements, federal legislation was proposed Tuesday to require sick days to combat H1N1 flu.

Prior to the examination, the students had petitioned the Council over a ruling by the Supreme Court which declared the examination and interview requirements as...

The plaintiffs, which claimed that they belong to a body known as Inter Party Advisory Council (IPAC), want the court to determine «whether INEC can deregister a party which has fulfilled and satisfied all requirements of registration simply because it fails to win a seat in the Presidential, Governorship, National or State Assembly without considering other elections like the Local Government Chairmanship and Councillors Elections.

Judge Paul Peatross Jr. of Albemarle County Circuit Court found that Cuccinelli had given no reason to suspect that Mann had committed any fraud, one of the requirements of a state law that Cuccinelli used as the basis for his case.

As attorney general, Pruitt in 2013 filed a friend of the court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in which he argued the EPA ignored the risks that gasoline with more than 10 percent ethanol can pose to cars» fuel systems as well as the RFS requirement's possible effect on food priceAs attorney general, Pruitt in 2013 filed a friend of the court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in which he argued the EPA ignored the risks that gasoline with more than 10 percent ethanol can pose to cars» fuel systems as well as the RFS requirement's possible effect on food prcourt brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in which he argued the EPA ignored the risks that gasoline with more than 10 percent ethanol can pose to cars» fuel systems as well as the RFS requirement's possible effect on food prCourt in which he argued the EPA ignored the risks that gasoline with more than 10 percent ethanol can pose to cars» fuel systems as well as the RFS requirement's possible effect on food priceas well as the RFS requirement's possible effect on food priceas the RFS requirement's possible effect on food prices.

Our field offices work closely with U.S. Attorney's Office to adhere to the legal requirements of their particular districts as set forth in case law or court decisions / precedent.

But the courts haven't always struck down EPA emissions trading programs — such as the trading program for nitrogen oxides — and when they have disqualified programs, it was either because agencies failed to follow proper procedure (as was the case with a Bush - era mercury rule that eased requirements on power plants) or because specific statutory goals were not followed (as was the case in the Clean Air Interstate Rule, which wouldn't have necessarily reduced all interstate pollution).

We may disclose information about our users, including contact information, to respond to subpoenas, court orders, legal process, and other law enforcement measures, and to comply with other legal obligations, such as FCC requirements, in our sole judgment.

As a result, many districts that originally faced court - ordered desegregation are having these requirements eliminated by lower courts that are following the Supreme Courtscourts that are following the Supreme CourtsCourts lead.

The site covers requirements from such sources as major court decisions, state labor laws, federal anti-discrimination statutes, and the Children's Internet Protection Act.

It needs be noted that the Constitutional Court, with reference to integration, ruled that recognised refugees can not be treated «as permanent residents because they are not in the same [legal] circumstances for the simple reason that they have yet to meet the requirements for permanent residence».21 The requirements include an onus placed on a refugee applicant to provide compelling reasons demonstrating that he / she will remain a refugee indefinitely, subject to an approval by the Standing Committee for Refugee Affairs (SCRA).

The provision seeks to reverse the recent federal appeals court ruling these parents obtained, which held that the regulation patently violated NCLB's unambiguous requirement that only fully prepared teachers be deemed «highly qualified» and that, as such, teachers still in - training must be publicly disclosed and not concentrated in low - income, high - minority schools.

But declaring it was within the executive branch's discretion and did not require the same standards as a judicial review, the court's decision did not much change the current process or add to the requirements.

As Mayor of Stamford Malloy was even one of the original plaintiffs in the critically important CCJEF v. Rell court case, a lawsuit that seeks to throw out the unfair and unconstitutional school funding formula and replace it with one that meets the requirements of Connecticut's Constitution and would be better for Connecticut's schools and taxpayers.

«We are pleased that the December 7, 2010 court order has served as a catalyst for change and are glad to see the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) making efforts to meet the terms of Prop. 39 by increasing the number of offers to provide district facilities to charter schools, particularly after years of not complying with the legal requirements of Proposition 39.

The Jumbo allows a NBS with additional requirements, such as a video - taped interview session with the borrower's attorney and a court reporter to ensure all parties understand the transaction.

At a Chapter 13 confirmation hearing, required as the basis for the order approving the plan and ordering the creditors to accept it (the hearing is called a section 341 hearing, or simply, â $ the three forty - oneâ $), the court either approves or disapproves the debtorâ $ ™ s repayment plan, depending on whether it meets the Bankruptcy Codeâ $ ™ s requirements for confirmation.

On remand in light of the Dudenhoeffer decision, the Amgen defendants presented a new argument that the Supreme Court established new pleading requirements applicable to cases such as this one.

Most courts, including those in California, have adopted a three - part test, known as the Brunner test, to determine if a debtor meets this requirement.

The Act also authorized state attorneys general or other appropriate state officials, as well as private persons who meet stringent jurisdictional requirements, to bring civil actions in federal district court.

The terms of the agreement provide for a statewide permanent injunction and require Kisicki to comply with probation requirements from her criminal case and pay the SPCA for Monterey County restitution as awarded by the criminal court.

Please note that the final decision as to whether a course satisfies the training requirements for humane officer appointment rests with the superior court charged with confirming the appointment.

In papers filed yesterday, the consumers argue that the Andersons have continued to violate a court order and the terms of a settlement agreement the parties entered into more than three years ago, by selling puppies from substandard breeding facilities and violating disclosure requirements as to where the puppies they sell come from.

«If someone fails to appear or hold up to court requirements, the court can revoke the bail as cash bail.»

The Whitechapel Gallery has published this list of objects, which are being loaned to the gallery for a forthcoming exhibition, as information under The Protection of Cultural Objects on Loan (Publication and Provision of Information) Regulations 2008 and that by publishing this information the Gallery makes no representations that any of these objects fulfill all the requirements of the section 134 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.

Attempts have been made by the Democrats to put limits on this funding like a cap, but they have been struck down by the courts as being «unconstitutional» and in conflict with free speech requirements.

Now, finally, he is brought before — and broadly derided by — the court, but nevertheless allowed to walk away without so much as a requirement that he cease and desist.

The overall standards are simply expressed by the requirements that statements are «full, true and plain» disclosure (using Canadian terminology) or even «the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth» as required by oaths in court.

Your comment to EPA regarding obligations to follow their own «procedural requirements» for data verification is especially pertinent because courts will frequently remand cases back to an agency for procedural errors such as this.