The common cap is $ 1 million in liquid assets to invest
as a definition because if you've got much more, then you're obviously a millionaire and not part of the mass affluent crowd.
Not exact matches
As a consultant, this one never really resonated much with me,
because by
definition, my mission was the client's mission.
As Suzanne Walsh, a partner at the law firm Murtha Cullina, explained to Fortune, this is no longer the case
because of a tweak to
definition of property eligible for the exemption:
That
definition could be a problem for many coins
because the excitement around initial coin offerings has been driven almost entirely by investors who have bought coins in the hope that they will become more valuable over time
as the underlying software is improved.
Lagarde didn't invoke «blockchain» specifically here possibly
because,
as The Verge recently noted, a
definition of what a blockchain is or isn't can become loose to the point of non-existent once system design starts drifting away from Bitcoin.
The report cites criticism that the
definition is over-inclusive
because the financial thresholds are unadjusted for inflation and the net worth calculation controversially includes certain assets such
as retirement accounts.
Jumbo loans are excluded from the survey
because by
definition, jumbo loans exceed the national conforming loan limit of $ 424,100; or, $ 636,150 in such «high - cost» areas
as Los Angeles, California and Montgomery County, Maryland.
Bitcoin is understood to fall under the
definition of virtual currency in the Act
because it is electronically exchanged for traditional currency by exchange service operators and can be used by anyone accepting Bitcoin
as payment.
For example, if Bitcoin is not a currency, then Bitcoin forwards and Bitcoin swaps that involve the exchange of Bitcoin for another currency will not fall under the statutory
definitions of the more lightly regulated foreign exchange forwards or foreign exchange swaps.10 Likewise, retail trading of Bitcoin derivatives will be limited to designated contract markets, rather than subject to the retail foreign exchange dealer regulations.11 Treating Bitcoin
as a commodity that is not a currency dovetails with the stances taken by other U.S. regulators such
as the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)(virtual currency does not have all of the attributes of real currency) 12, the Securities and Exchange Commission (Bitcoin investments are investment contracts
because Bitcoin is a form of money) 13 and the Internal Revenue Service (treating Bitcoin
as property for tax purposes).14
hi webmonk... np's
definition of «vision»
as i understand it is the corporate idea of vision... so planning a hospital visit is fine
because it doesn't enslave the people to a self serving agenda.
2) So let's discard the word truth,
because believers have found great joy in wasting time debating the
definition of truth and shifting to «God's truth»
as their counterpoint.
And we also know you are not only wrong, but dishonest
because you are using a bait - and - switch on his
definition of atheist; only 0.7 % of Americans actually call themselves atheists versus the 15 % who the American Religious Identification Survey describes
as None / No Religion.
If one accepts those axioms
as being true by
definition, then the Pythagorean theorem is «true» also,
because it necessarily follows directly from those axioms.
Craig that was exactly my understanding however if we believe that in that traditional sense a person could lose there eternal life by there actions by not walking in the Lord which i do nt think is right
as eternal life is a free gift from God not based on works.Jeremys
definition is that we are saved by faith in Jesus Christ to eternal life.I believe the term salvation has the meaning to be saved not necesarily to eternal life but saved from ourselves Christ gives us the power to be transformed into his likeness or to be Christ like.In the eternal picture our actions determine how we are rewarded from God although its not the motivation of the reward but
because we love the Lord.regards brent
We don't know much else
because,
as a society, we don't have a clear
definition of love.
Just
as the Virgin Birth, and the physical Resurrection of Christ are and were requirements of his literal Divinity and uniqueness upon the human scene, so also this type of development to which we appeal can not take place, except in a Church which claims the infallible magisterium on earth of the same Jesus in the name of his Divinity, and can manifest a line of consistent and coherent,
definition because she has done so.
For most feminists, this means no strict gender roles or a hierarchy that demands a man be the authority over a woman just
because he's a man and that a woman be submissive and quiet just
because she's a woman.Feminism means allowing both women and men to be themselves
as God created them to be —
as individuals, not defined by their reproductive system but rather by their personalities, their relationships, their
definitions of themselves.
As always; I say «god»
because I don't have any
definition of «god».
Because of the «ism» at the end, making it appear
as if it were an ideology, and the fact that they do not understand the
definition of the word... and many seek to use a «false equivalency» in a bid to bolster their failed arguments, too.
The Chalcedonian
Definition failed to unite the church, partly
because it does not so much provide a solution
as define the problem.
No unambiguous
definition of «liturgy» has been attempted, and
because of this it is not clear why episcopally instituted and controlled devotions (or, for example, the rite of the Corpus Christi procession) are not to be regarded
as liturgy,
as this text presupposes rather than teaches or states explicitly.
All species of wholes qualify
as systems despite their considerable differences
because they fall under this minimal
definition of the real.
I mention, only
because my... paradigm (I'm not much on beliefs, in the usual organized religion sense)... includes a «Divine» of my own
definition, that equates to something like «awe of life, love, and knowing that there is much we don't know» (< — sorry, not the easiest thing for me to get into words, hopefully that gets the gist of it) that I don't see
as a «personal other», but, in my paradigm, I see that Divine
as being systemic to everything, hence insights from what I learn / experience can be termed
as the Divine acting.
Gary: The reason I'm hesitant about your
definition of «religious» is
because,
as you say, your
definition has everything to do with your personal views and beliefs, and not
as much to do with how people who call themselves religious perceive themselves, nor with the 150 or so years of academic research into religious phenomena.
I'm just saying that your
definition of religion,
as I'm reading it, is a bit too personal and value - laden (that is, prescriptive rather than descriptive), and misses a lot of the actual data of religion
because of this.
These two
definitions indicate,
as they should, the same thing,
because closed - upness is precisely the mute, and when it is to express itself, this must take place against its will,
as the freedom which is the ground underlying unfreedom revolts upon entering into communication with the freedom without; it now betrays unfreedom, and the individual betrays himself against his will in anxiety....
Therefore I do not by any means intend to dispose of the Socratic
definition on the ground that one can not stop with it but, having the Christian
definition in mente [in mind], I would make use of it to bring the other out sharply (just
because the Socratic
definition is so genuinely Greek), so that here
as always the hollowness of every other
definition which is not in the strictest sense Christian (that is, of every partial
definition) may become manifest.
We must not forget the words Jesus took from the prophet Isaiah
as the
definition of his mission: «The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor.
The latter part of this previous statement is important
because even my rights
as a human being are by
definition limited by the very fact that my fellow human beings have rights
as well.
If one accepts Whitehead's
definition of time
as «the conformation of state to state, the later to the earlier,» and if one assumes that the past really changes, then we would have no conception of time
because there would be nothing definite or determinate for the present to conform to.12 The distinction between the past and the future seems to be at least partly defined in terms of determinateness and indeterminateness.
Often referred to
as complementary and alternative medicine, or simply
as CAM, alternative medicine resists easy
definition because the health systems and practices to which it refers are diffuse and its boundaries are poorly defined.»
There is only one God... human imagine or uses their thoughts to come up with multiple Gods... which i think is lake of understanding about the
definition of God... i also think the reason we see this is mostly
because the teaching of these faiths are showing God
as an old dude with white long beard and extended hands... its all human imaginations...
Part of the problem in discussions such
as this is that we don't have common
definitions, simply
because the
definitions rest on presuppositions.
Part of the problem in discussions such
as this is that we donâ $ ™ t have common
definitions, simply
because the
definitions rest on presuppositions.»
I deliberated the inclusion of wind
as an example of an intangible existent, but chose to include it
because the point I was making was not really one of ease of
definition but difficulty of packaging.
It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to say by that And
because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk,
as I have already demonstrated And your main point,
as I already explained is false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by
definition virtually impossible to prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.
One is inclined to say that anybody who is well adjusted to contemporary society is by
definition very maladjusted indeed,
because contemporary society is
as mad
as a coot and is something to which nobody ought to be adjusted, even in this land, not to speak of others which may be less fortunate than ours.
It certainly is confusing, and I wanted to mention Dennett's
definition — written in the fabulous book BREAKING THE SPELL —
because I think it cuts to the point nicely, and is
as unambiguous
as possible.
«the law's effectiveness is yet to be tested, in part
because of protections it gives to «confidential communications,»
as well
as a vague
definition of who should be considered a member of the clergy.
All biographical decisions are murky, but this one was essentially simple: I felt that I could not be a Lutheran minister unless I could fully assent to the
definition of the faith
as stated in the Lutheran confessions, and I drew back from this role
because I doubted whether I could give such unqualified assent.
As to good uses... the majority of history disagrees with your opinion, simply
because of percentages.Atheism is by its very
definition an extreme minority among peoples.There simply have not been enough of them to be a serious contributing factor to the progress of mankind.Granted even a blind squirrel gets an acorn once in a while.
That's
because the FDA has already confirmed that Sunfiber — partially hydrolyzed guar gum — qualifies
as a dietary fiber under its new, more stringent
definition.
Mainly
because there is a medical / biological use
as well
as a nerdy space
definition.
By
definition, grain - free recipes do not include grains, and
because gluten is found in grains such
as wheat and barley, these recipes are naturally gluten - free!
Because we are «supporters» after - all and the
definition of being supportive is to criticise and to whinge and moan,
as well
as only focusing on the negatives.
The guy can not, JUST CAN NOT, deliver trophies on a regular basis... But he will tell you we are «a top club»... Looked up the
definition because we have not and never had the criteria... Except the stadium and the finances (and even that it is not clear
as the ticket prices seemed to increase each season...)
Because,
as it stands now, the
definition of «midwife» isn't standard, nor the protocols used.
Once she grasped the various legal
definitions of sibling you could say then it gets trickier
because adults and kids often attach emotionally to someone they wish or feel like is their brother or sister and they may refer to them
as such despite not sharing any type of parent legally or even socially!
Because if you do, then by your definition, you are a terrible parent as well because you aren't watching, raising, teaching or bonding with your
Because if you do, then by your
definition, you are a terrible parent
as well
because you aren't watching, raising, teaching or bonding with your
because you aren't watching, raising, teaching or bonding with your child.
Another analysis was conducted for ever vs never breastfed, including 14 studies
because 3 studies did not have data for never breastfed.18, 41,43 The
definition of never breastfed differed among studies, with some defining never
as no and some
as less than 1 month; therefore, between - study heterogeneity was significantly higher (Cochran - Q = 38; P <.01; I2 = 65.8 %; 95 % CI, 30.8 % -79.2 %).