The first layer that is just beneath your skin was the type of fat considered by nutrition scientists to be the first type to be used
as a fuel source if food was not available.
They are one of the building blocks of body tissue and can be used
as a fuel source if needed.
Not exact matches
As he prodded the prime minister, Nye, best known as the host of the 1990s PBS show «Bill Nye the Science Guy,» and more recently for the Netflix series «Bill Nye Saves the World,» cited a study by a group called The Solutions Project that concluded Canada could live entirely without fossil fuels if it fully embraced renewable energy source
As he prodded the prime minister, Nye, best known
as the host of the 1990s PBS show «Bill Nye the Science Guy,» and more recently for the Netflix series «Bill Nye Saves the World,» cited a study by a group called The Solutions Project that concluded Canada could live entirely without fossil fuels if it fully embraced renewable energy source
as the host of the 1990s PBS show «Bill Nye the Science Guy,» and more recently for the Netflix series «Bill Nye Saves the World,» cited a study by a group called The Solutions Project that concluded Canada could live entirely without fossil
fuels if it fully embraced renewable energy
sources.
As an example, if oil is high, $ KORN will rise as ethanol becomes more desired as an alternative source of fue
As an example,
if oil is high, $ KORN will rise
as ethanol becomes more desired as an alternative source of fue
as ethanol becomes more desired
as an alternative source of fue
as an alternative
source of
fuel.
Well, I believe that food should be used
as a
source of
fuel or recovery for your body, so
if you work out, then you need to give it some loving with some good - for - you ingredients I also don't believe in all that no - fat nonsense!
If your goal is to burn fat
as a primary
fuel source (ketogenic diet) then you would need to add some MCT oil
as well or watch your carbs closely throughout the day.
If you think about food
as your body's
fuel source you know that you'll need to have in it everything your body uses.The most important parts to include are good fats, good proteins and healthy types of carbohydrates.
This relates to the whole area of development for people talking about biofuels, which is this idea of trying to develop replacements for the conventional sorts of fossil
fuels that we have to at least —
if we are going to be burning some sort of hydrocarbons of some kind — to try to get them [so] that they are being derived from a different
source, and potentially or ideally, ones that would actually burn without delivering
as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere too; that's great
if you can get that.
There is not enough oil from plants such
as soy and canola to supply even a fraction of the 60 million — plus gallons of jet
fuel burned every day by U.S. aircraft, nearly one quarter of global use, even
if all such
sources were converted to
fuel (which would significantly impact food supplies.)
And
if alga is going to become a commercially viable
fuel source, scientists must ensure that not only can it produce
as much oil
as possible, but also that it can grow
as fast
as possible.
But there are a number of complexities related to the viability of a new
fuel, Fretheim added, such
as the vehicle payback period, the need for new infrastructure, overcoming maintenance issues and
sourcing enough of an alternative
fuel to test it and to fully adopt it
if it works.
The jist of this is that we must NOT suddenly switch off carbon / sulphur producing industries over the planet but instead we must first dramatically reduce CO2 emissions from every conceivable
source, then gradually tackle coal / fossil
fuel sources to smoothly remove the soot from the air to prevent a sudden leap in average global temps which
if it is indeed 2.75 C
as the UNEP predicts will permanently destroy the climates ability to regulate itself and lead to catastrophic changes on the land and sea.
«What it does is it takes different sorts of
fuel materials such
as plutonium or used nuclear
fuel, it casts that into a metallic
fuel, it puts it in a reactor that has liquid sodium
as a coolant — and
if you have liquid sodium
as a coolant then the energies of the neutrons are higher so you can use a different
fuel source.
Protein can be broken down into glucose
if the body is in need of it, but it is the least preferable
source of
fuel for energy
as it difficult to convert (unlike carbohydrates).
It doesn't matter at all
if they come from grains and carbohydrates (which raise the blood sugar, get stored
as fat and wreak havoc on the body) or proteins (which are needed for important functions like cell repair) or fats (which are a much more dense and effective
source of
fuel).
If someone was to start their exercise session with cardio, during the training session glucose will be utilized
as the primary
fuel source until the point that blood sugar is depleted.
If, however, your goals are to lean out, drop a few pounds, or participate in ultra-endurance sports (for instance, running events of more than 100 miles where using fat
as a primary
fuel source without the need for fast - energy - producing carbs might be more beneficial), a lower carb diet might help you achieve your goals.
If glucose levels drop too much, the liver synthesizes ketone bodies
as a sort of back up
fuel source for use by other organs (4).
If structured properly, a key reason that the following protocols help people, people tend to decrease their food cravings, their dependence on sugar
as primary
fuel source and some of their excess bodyfat
as well.
As you check out the graph above, think of plasma glucose as something you'd get from a gel or sports drink or bar (or from the breakdown of protein); plasma free fatty acids as something you'd get from breaking down your own fat tissue, or from a dietary source of fat; muscle triglycerides as stored fat in muscle (or perhaps from an external source like coconut oil, if that's your fuel of choice), and muscle glycogen as your body's storage carbohydrat
As you check out the graph above, think of plasma glucose
as something you'd get from a gel or sports drink or bar (or from the breakdown of protein); plasma free fatty acids as something you'd get from breaking down your own fat tissue, or from a dietary source of fat; muscle triglycerides as stored fat in muscle (or perhaps from an external source like coconut oil, if that's your fuel of choice), and muscle glycogen as your body's storage carbohydrat
as something you'd get from a gel or sports drink or bar (or from the breakdown of protein); plasma free fatty acids
as something you'd get from breaking down your own fat tissue, or from a dietary source of fat; muscle triglycerides as stored fat in muscle (or perhaps from an external source like coconut oil, if that's your fuel of choice), and muscle glycogen as your body's storage carbohydrat
as something you'd get from breaking down your own fat tissue, or from a dietary
source of fat; muscle triglycerides
as stored fat in muscle (or perhaps from an external source like coconut oil, if that's your fuel of choice), and muscle glycogen as your body's storage carbohydrat
as stored fat in muscle (or perhaps from an external
source like coconut oil,
if that's your
fuel of choice), and muscle glycogen
as your body's storage carbohydrat
as your body's storage carbohydrate.
Developing aerobic endurance means that you're training your body to sustain some level of activity for a prolonged period of time, (typically 30 minutes
if not much more), and you're utilizing fat
as a
fuel source rather than glucose (sugar) or some other energy
source.
Some may also benefit from this
if they ever feel light - headed during a fast but this may simply be the case
if they are not metabolically adapted to utilising fats
as a predominant
fuel source.
If your body really preferred carbohydrates
as its primary
fuel source, shouldn't those numbers be reversed?
If you are already following a ketogenic diet, you might not recognize much change during this phase, which is intended to flip the metabolic switch towards burning fat
as the primary
fuel source.
This is a big big part of why this plan will work
as fats work well
as a
fuel source but
if they are taken too low along with carbohydrates too low it is a definite that muscle loss will occur and happen very rapidly.
If you want to consume enough calories it is preferable to rely on starches, not fat,
as your primary
fuel source.
I'll get in a second to why this could be important for you
if you're trying to boost your sports performance or to figure out what you're supposed to eat you know, during endurance but the other thing that was interesting was that there was another study that looked at basically how your body taps into this intramuscular triglyceride and it was found that the, when your body is tapping into intramuscular triglyceride
sources, your intramuscular triglyceride pool to use that stuff
as an energy
source during exercise, it can actually cause a little bit of an insulin response and cause your pancreas to have to work a little bit, to churn out insulin in order for you to be able to effectively tap into this adipose tissue and so it's one of those things where there is a little bit of stress on the pancreas when you're tapping into these intramuscular triglycerides even though they're used
as a really really potent
source of
fuel for you when you're out there performing specifically endurance exercise and in this case, for this fasted, male endurance athletes, 60 - 70 % intensity.
If you eat too many carbs (regular desserts are overloaded with them), your body is overloaded with carbohydrates (
fuel that can be used for energy) which will prevent the body from using other energy
sources such
as fat or protein, leading to weight gain and blood sugar spikes.
it's not going to be
as viable
fuel source, at least
as much
as if you were just doing cardio, or slow cardio that wasn't really taxing your muscle.
And I started to look at food not
as a
source of pleasure, but
as a
source of
fuel: I could run farther
if I had oatmeal for breakfast, so that's what I ate.
And
if you get a solar array on your house or in your backyard you will be transporting yourself using sunlight
as your
fuel source.
I doubt that politicians truely understand the problem at hand, it is not
as if we have a new energy technology ready to fill in for fossil fusl at the present time and whilst I am sure than energy efficiency can reduce carbon emissions by around 25 % it will be left to the markets to decide this and that means awaiting the onset of peak fossil
fuels to push up the price of it that will make other energy
sources more viable.
The position is that
IF you have a carbon - neutral power
source, such
as nuke - electric, wind - electric, solar - electric, geothermal, etc, then the claim is that this process will efficiently produce liquid
fuel from atmospheric CO2.
If fuel prices stay the way they've been (that is, expensive and becoming more so), we can expect to see more funding for magnificent developments in alternative
fuels (sadly, one of which is coal)
as they supplant oil
as an industrial, commercial and transportation energy
source.
The piece effectively,
if depressingly, reveals why all of the options for slowing or stopping the buildup of this long - lived greenhouse gas will be nearly impossible to deploy at a scale relevant to the climate challenge
as long
as conventional burning of abundant carbon - rich
fuels — particularly coal — is the cheapest energy
source.
Non-food plant
sources, such
as jatropha and camelina, are promising, but difficult to produce in large quantities and can end up displacing food crops or lead to deforestation
if the price of
fuel rises high enough.
If we are going to make a transition, for example, from fossil fuels to nuclear energy or to solar energy or to wind energy, if you think about that as a major source of energy during the next 50 years from now, you better start right no
If we are going to make a transition, for example, from fossil
fuels to nuclear energy or to solar energy or to wind energy,
if you think about that as a major source of energy during the next 50 years from now, you better start right no
if you think about that
as a major
source of energy during the next 50 years from now, you better start right now.
If the full cost of burning fossil
fuels, including health effects and the costs of climate change, were incorporated into the price of electricity, PV would quickly be revealed
as one of the least expensive
sources of power.
A low - cost emissions - free
source of electricity generation, wind energy will be essential
if the province is to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 80 per cent in 2050
as clean electricity will be needed to substitute for fossil
fuels in transportation, industries and buildings.
As the western world depends on there continuing to be a good supply of fossil
fuels from the Middle East and other parts of the developing world, there will always be a necessity to plan for all eventualities in this area (NOTE — I know the US purchases relatively little of its oil from the ME, but
if this was not available there would be more competition for supplies from other
sources).
If this was a murder trial, our crime scene FBI experts would be would be saying that the carbon from fossil
fuels are the guilty party, not natural
sources, such
as volcanoes or the ocean.
As for me, I'm buying American - made, and paying more
if necessary to get a car that uses American -
sourced fuel.
--
If electricity is generated using both a renewable energy resource or other qualifying energy resource and an energy
source that is not a renewable energy resource or other qualifying energy resource (
as, for example, in the case of co-firing of renewable biomass and fossil
fuel), the Commission shall issue Federal renewable electricity credits based on the proportion of the electricity that is attributable to the renewable energy resource or other qualifying energy resource.
If the nuclear power plant lifetimes were extended
as briefly planned in 2010, the retiring fossil
fuel plants could more easily be replaced by renewable energy
sources, followed by a replacement of the nuclear plants with renewables
as well.
In addition, he believes that
if we want to genuinely reduce our carbon footprint, the current renewable energy
sources are too expensive and unreliable to work
as genuine alternatives to fossil
fuels.
If we truly move out of fossil fuel fast and furiously, demand for substitutes — for instance forests as a fuel source — could place tremendous new pressures on our planet if not managed wel
If we truly move out of fossil
fuel fast and furiously, demand for substitutes — for instance forests
as a
fuel source — could place tremendous new pressures on our planet
if not managed wel
if not managed well.
Chaos would erupt
as people try to survive Even
if fossil
fuels are slowly phased out, there are insufficientsustainable energy
sources for the Earth's current population andlevel of industrialization, especially for motor vehicleconsumption (e.g. transportation, shipping, mining, agriculture).
In effect wind acts
as a supplemental energy
source, saving the
fuel and emissions at other plants (
if conditions are favourable).
If Oregon, and the Northwest, truly wants a domestic -
as in local - and renewable
fuel source, we should be looking to build a cellulosic ethanol industry using waste from the large Northwest forestry and agriculture sectors to produce our liquid
fuels (and a bit of electricity)
as well
as additional electricity from the Northwest's diverse and abundant renewable energy
sources to power the electric component of a plug - in hybrid flex
fuel fleet.
And nuclear power is just
as sustainable
as any other power
source — even
if we only use conventional nuclear fast reactor designs, there is enough uranium in the oceans and on land (recoverable at prices that allow the
fuel costs of fast reactors to remain the same
as today — which is trivial) to last for 5 billlion years, the expected time remaining fo our sun.