Sentences with phrase «as a function of temperature rise»

Then as a function of temperature rise, the feedback does something that either causes temperature to rise more or less.

Not exact matches

The evolution of temperature as a function of latitude and the timing of CO2 rise are shown below (at two different time periods in part a, see the caption).

Do you REALLY want to insist that those turned - off air conditioners could possibly function as a source of heat (or temperature rise) under such conditions and actually warm up that cold room?

If one postulates that the global average surface temperature tracks the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, possibly with some delay, then when the CO2 concentration continues to rise monotonically but the global average surface temperature shows fluctuations as a function of time with changes in slope (periods wherein it decreases), then you must throw the postulate away.

You provide references to two graphes showing a rise in global temperatures as a function of time.

That is, the amount that surface temperatures rise as a function of the amount of CO2 in the atmopshere.

But, just in case you were semi-serious: With oceans covering 70 % of the earth's surface, you could never change atmospheric humidity — water vapor pressure is a function of atmospheric temperature, increasing as temperature rises.

There are plenty of tipping points like this: The Amazon, for instance, appears to be drying out and starting to burn as temperatures rise and drought deepens, and without a giant rainforest in South America, the world would function very differently.

In other words, to consider just the colder object, as it emits energy to the warmer object it cools, but it also warms from the energy input of the warmer object which causes its temperature to rise as a function of the difference between its absortivity and its emissivity.

Because of adiabatic lapse (think PV = nRT), the temperature of the atmosphere drops rather quickly as a function of height until you get up to the thermosphere, where there is a large rise in temperature, but so rarefied an atmosphere as not to have any significant impact on the atmospheric windows.

I mean that if there is no way to validate climate science via empirical measurement, especially the predictions of temperature rise as a function of CO2 concentration, then we are getting nowhere.

They also considered the rate of decomposition of soil carbon as a function of the temperature at the freeze - thaw boundary, which sinks deeper and deeper as the soil's temperature rises.