What is happening here, for the first time in two thousand years, for the first time since the apostle Paul pondered the continuing «mystery» of Living Judaism, for the first time since the Church condemned Marcion
as a heretic in the second century, for the first time since so many things in our tortuously entangled relationship, is that believing Jews and Christians are encountering one another on a footing of civil equality in a shared exploration of the way through history of the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Jesus.
Theodore was condemned
as a heretic in the fifth Ecumenical Council of Constantinople in AD 553.)
I was condemned
as a heretic in December 2001 by my Baptist Church here in WV.
The best pitchers on the defending World Series champions were widely viewed
as heretics in the context of their time.
Not exact matches
In Altman's view, people who have criticized those ideas for businesses have cast the entrepreneurs behind them
as «
heretics,» like how the Catholic Church sentenced Galileo to house arrest for (correctly) saying the Earth revolves around the sun.
The older I get — and against the nerve of Strauss's dogma — I think more and more of Locke
as a mixture of good and evil implicit
in the idea of Christian
heretic.
As do you I trust
in Hashem that any act of these
heretics, be they «Christian», «Muslim», «Mormon», etc. are null and void to begin with.
There are also essays on such diverse topics
as princely martyrs
in Kievan Russia, medieval
heretics as Protestant martyrs, John Foxe and the politics of Marian persecution, and the veneration of the martyrs of Ikitsuki
in the seventeenth century.
There were of course some who saved records, but for the most part Christianity tended to condemn anything not like them, blamed them
as heretics and causes of plagues and poisoners of wells trying to wipe out any alternate religions that remained
in Europe through much of the last two thousand years.
I myself, having been exposed to the ancient beliefs of Taino Native Americans and Far Easterners transplanted into Latin America
as well
as Christianity, have a more pragmatic, holistic outlook on divinity and religious teachings which I choose to defer expressing, lest I be branded here
in the Christian South
as a
HERETIC.
These people would have thrown you
in prison
as a
heretic for saying the Earth is not the center of the universe and yet people of faith worship these ideals.
Centuries past I could've had her burned
as a witch or she could've turned me
in as a
heretic to be quartered by horses.
The libertine and ascetic Gnostics strike us
as being incompatible
heretics, however
in the act of day - by - day living each may have slipped into the other's territory.
If they didn't try to stone you on the spot, you would at least be condemned
as a
heretic liberal who deserved to spend eternity
in the deepest hell.
Many identified
in this piece
as Meliorist evangelicals are more easily and usefully defined, once their teachings are isolated and clarified,
as garden - variety
heretics.
It appears that if I am not a CHRISTIAN troll, I am to be condemned
as a
heretic / heathen while the apologist crowd, no matter how different their beliefs will band together
in righteous indignation.
But we do not condemn the other person
as a
heretic, to burn forever
in the lake of fire.
Mathison might say that by such a refusal, I am placing myself
as an individual above and against the Holy Spirit - guided consensus of the rest of the church, which therefore places me
in the category of «
heretic.»
In 1569 in Holland, a Mennonite named Dirk Willems, under capital sentence as a heretic, was fleeing from arrest, pursued by a «thief - catcher.&raqu
In 1569
in Holland, a Mennonite named Dirk Willems, under capital sentence as a heretic, was fleeing from arrest, pursued by a «thief - catcher.&raqu
in Holland, a Mennonite named Dirk Willems, under capital sentence
as a
heretic, was fleeing from arrest, pursued by a «thief - catcher.»
We were viewed
as heretics when we tried to tell others
in our ministry about it.
In fact, he was condemned
as a
heretic by the Catholic church.
A trial ensued,
in which Servetus was once again condemned
as a
heretic, and on October 27, 1553, was burned at the stake on top of a pile of his own books.
For Lent this year, I'm reading a
heretic,
as David Mills suggests (his title is provocative, but his point is about building compassion among brothers and sisters
in Christ across the Reformational line).
«Until we know the power of divine grace, we read
in the Bible concerning eternal punishment, and we think it is too heavy and too hard, and we are apt to kick against it, and find out some
heretic or other who teaches us another doctrine; but when the soul is really quickened by divine grace, and made to feel the weight of sin, it thinks the bottomless pit none too deep, and the punishment of hell none too severe for sin such
as it has committed.
For Douthat, however, our present identity
as a «nation of
heretics» marks a departure from earlier periods,
in particular the post «World War II era of America's Greatest Generation, when Roman Catholic orthodoxy and the mainline Protestant denominations ruled the culture
in ways that were truly Christian and faithful.
But if we condemn those who disagree with us
as «
heretics,» or if we smugly think that their disagreement with us is «persecution for our faith» which therefore proves our view is correct, we will never grow
in unity with one another, and we will never learn to see our own doctrinal and theological missteps.
Because of the radical views of Tatian, the church Fathers
in the west portrayed him
as the epitome of
heretics.
Paul's point
in putting it this way is not to give us a book of theological trump cards by which we can denounce
as heretics all who disagree with us.
As a consequence he was accused of being a
heretic in the Presbyterian Church and charges were pressed against him.
He said that such men treat the Bible «
as if it were a baby, to be wrapped
in swaddling clothes, nursed, and carefully guarded, lest it should be injured by
heretics and skeptics.»
Christians
in the past have spoken of Muhammad
as a
heretic, with a false or inadequate understanding of God.
Often these definitions were fashioned
in the shops of the
heretics themselves — weapons sometimes
as dangerous to those who fashioned or wielded them
as they were to their opponents!
It is important to point out that the belief was used
in the early church
as a way of affirming Jesus» full humanity; «born of a virgin»
in the Apostles» Creed has the force of «really born of a woman,»
in opposition to
heretics who denied that Jesus was truly human.
Plus,
as I've already mentioned, a monk named Calcidius espoused this view
in the 5th century and was not branded a
heretic for doing so.
But depending on who you ask, how the Church has dealt with «
heretics»
in its midst can sometimes be seen
as anything but sympathetic.
At least half of his life after his conversion
in 193 was spent
as a member of the Montanists — to the point of founding his own North African version, one destined to last to the time of St Augustine — and the Montanists, we must remember, were not simply separated from communion with the Catholic Church: they were indeed,
as St Thomas Aquinas says of Tertullian himself, actual
heretics.
Christianities developed historically ONLY
in communities, or people like Smith were declared a «
heretic»,
as they cooked up nonsense.
Also, if you believe
in the Bible, then you should know that false condemnation and the spreading of false prophecies (attributing storms and natural phenomenon to God's «wrath») puts you
in the same line of sinners
as heretics, murders, thieves and rapists.
Ironically, many
in Free Grace circles condemn Brian McLaren, Tony Campolo, and others
in their camp
as heretics.
The honeymoon, that is, between the now enfeebled and increasingly remote souls who for over a quarter of a century had carped and sneered at Pope John Paul II (and by the same token at «PanzerCardinal» Joseph Ratzinger) but who had nevertheless hoped against hope for a Pope who would be somehow reborn if not
as a fully paid - up liberal,
as a Pope at least who would go easy on all that counter-cultural JPII stuff about being «signs of contradiction» and about continuity with the pre-conciliar Church and who had breathlessly found (so they thought) that, lo, it was even so,
in the wonders of Deus Caritas Est. «On his election last spring,» carolled The Tablet, «the former CardinalRatzinger was widely assumed to have
as his papal agenda the hammering of
heretics and a war on secularist relativism, subjects with which he was associated
as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.»
God appears to me
in another form besides that of love;
in the form of omnipotence, of a severe power not bound by love... So long
as love is not exalted into... an essence, so long there lurks
in the background of love a subject who even without love is something by himself, an unloving monster, a diabolical being, whose personality, separable and actually separated from love, delights
in the blood of
heretics and unbelievers, — the phantom of religious fanaticism.»
While there is no such things
as a «
heretic»
in the traditional sense, there are «false teachers.»
Is the persecutions of
heretics justifiable
as many Christians authorities have claimed
in the past?
In reply, Jesus told the familiar parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:30 - 37), where the neighbor who must be loved is clearly one whom strict Jews would regard
as a half - breed and a
heretic.
Yes women who have the gift of Teaching via God the Holy Spirit can teach but they can not take on the clearly defined «Office» Position of Pastor
as defined
in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1:6, The Scripture is the first and final authority on what God has spoken, not the rhetorical babble of
heretics who don't follow the word of God.
As G. K. Chesterton said in the last chapter of his early book Heretics, «If there be such a thing as mental growth, it must mean the growth into more and more definite convictions, into more and more dogma
As G. K. Chesterton said
in the last chapter of his early book
Heretics, «If there be such a thing
as mental growth, it must mean the growth into more and more definite convictions, into more and more dogma
as mental growth, it must mean the growth into more and more definite convictions, into more and more dogmas.
Jews
in Jesus» day thought of the Samaritans
as the violent
heretics, much the same way that Christians think of Muslims today.
Those who treat the wrath of God
as taboo, whether
in sermons or hymns, stand
in a long lineage too, one that includes Albrecht Ritschl, Faustus Socinus, and the unnamed revisionists
in the second century who followed the
heretic Marcion.
He is pictured
as himself a story - teller
in whose stories there is equally vivid harmonizing of contrasts: a father embracing a prodigal son, a tax collector praying for forgiveness; a
heretic showing a compassion far surpassing that of the orthodox, an employer rewarding laggards with the same wages
as those who have worked a full day.
But he does argue for toleration for Jews and Muslims
in an emphatic way,
as he does not for
heretics.