Thiel says he himself was a victim of the blurring of that line when Gawker outed
him as a homosexual in 2007 without his permission.
He is identified
as a homosexual in the Reformed Church of the Netherlands which formally approves, inter alia, gay partners as ministers.
It was partly autobiographical of the relationship Mills had with his father and his coming out
as a homosexual in his older age.
Not exact matches
Moore, who identifies
as an evangelical Christian and views homosexuality
as a lifestyle that is «against nature,» said
in a 2005 interview on C - SPAN2 that he believes «
homosexual conduct should be illegal.»
So terms like a
homosexual lifestyle and
homosexual activity are easily painted
as bad or good, with no points
in between.
But perfect love casts out fear... if he perfectly loved, there would be no reason for him fear that we are destroying America... no fear for us to teach sunday school... and no fear of the future when
homosexuals are accepted
as equals, even
in Alabama (where I live) or
in whatever southern state fishon is
in.
This would mean repealing anti-sodomy laws, permitting
homosexuals to serve
in the military on the same terms
as heterosexuals, including lessons about homosexuality
in public school sex - education programs, and legalizing
homosexual marriage and divorce.
«Responsible
homosexuals would join Paul
in condemning anyone who uses children for sex, just
as we would join anyone else
in condemning the threatened gang rape
in Sodom or the behavior of the sex - crazed priests and priestesses
in Rome.
My question is: Shouldn't the preachers» brainstorming on
homosexual activity
in more and more disrespectful details be considered
as perversion and a sin?
preacherlady said, on November 5th, 2009 at 9:35 pm Fishon... thats
as prejudiced a statement to condemn something because it was written by a
homosexual as it was to judge you because you are Church of Christ -------- Alice, the Bible doesn't condemn being
in or of the Church of Christ, but it does condemn practicing homosexuality and
as I said before, calls it....
For a while the notion that homosexuality was a «choice» (
as in the phrase «sexual preference») was
homosexual - movement orthodoxy;
in recent years the correct line has been that it's somehow inherent.
And since marriage is a union between one man and one woman —
as with Adam and Eve
in the garden —
homosexual marriage is wrong.
He asserts that «
homosexual relationships, even
in their current, somewhat eclectic form, may contain features that could nourish the broader society
as well.»
In order for things to change, pastors and Christian leaders who believe that acceptance, fidelity, and monogamy are a better alternative to shame and promiscuity have got to speak up and speak out against the teaching that states * all *
homosexual expression is sinful... and proclaim that message
as misinformed, damaging to God's children, and unchristian.
I'll wager that if he looks around Floyd County, Virginia, he'll find about
as many
homosexuals relative to the overall population
as here
in Cook County, Illinois, though the former are certainly obliged to hide it much better.
Father John Harvey states (
in The
Homosexual Person: New Thinking
in Pastoral Care) that some
homosexuals may be victims of truly compulsive behavior and
as such deserve our special sympathy and understanding; but even these unfortunate individuals, he notes, may exercise the choice to seek help.
As is typically the case
in this genre, the author's rage is directed at the Cardinal's abiding by church teaching on abortion and the
homosexual «lifestyle.»
Brunne is described
as the «first openly lesbian bishop
in the world,» living «
in a registered
homosexual partnership» — with another lesbian priest — and «has received a church blessing» for it.
Far from being an indicator of social acceptance of homosexuality, a movie such
as The Birdcage - sanitized of what
homosexuals actually do with their plumbing, and of grim specters such
as AIDS - is a very traditional instance of people finding
homosexual behavior, especially
in its more flamboyant cross-dressing variations, ludicrously funny.
One suggestion recommends, «not using phrases such
as «gay», «lesbian» or «
homosexual» to define a person's identity,»
in order to «take every aspect of the person into consideration.»
I love the argument he makes, even while I am a progressive Christian who accepts
homosexuals as equals
in the eyes of God.
This is dramatically clear
in the movement to establish
homosexual unions
as an alternative kind of family.
The theological issues are far from resolved; but, judging from what has happened
in Bloomington, even conservative Christians (though traditionally among those most opposed to gay civil rights) are learning that theological concerns need not blind any of us to the needs and rights of
homosexuals as human beings.
Maybe a few are struggling not to indulge
in homosexual activities, and these could be possibly christians
as well.
The following words or word fragments will get your post censored (list is incomplete): arse
as in Arsenal bastard bitch clit cock
as in cockatiel coon
as in cocoon cracker cum
as in circumstance cunt douche effing fag ftw fuck goddamn gloryhole homo
as in homosexual hooters horny hump jackass jap jism kinky kooch necrophilia nigra
as in denigrate nigger nipple orgy pis poon porn prick pussy queer rape
as in grape sex
as in homosexual shit slut smut snatch spic
as in despicable tit
as in constitution or title twat vag
as in vague whore wonderful us wop wtf xxx
In addition to seeking cooperation, from gay movements in mainline Christian bodies, such as Dignity (Roman Catholic) and Integrity (Episcopalian), the group has invited Ralph Blair, director of the Homosexual Community Counseling Center in New York cit
In addition to seeking cooperation, from gay movements
in mainline Christian bodies, such as Dignity (Roman Catholic) and Integrity (Episcopalian), the group has invited Ralph Blair, director of the Homosexual Community Counseling Center in New York cit
in mainline Christian bodies, such
as Dignity (Roman Catholic) and Integrity (Episcopalian), the group has invited Ralph Blair, director of the
Homosexual Community Counseling Center
in New York cit
in New York city.
On one end is the noncompromising «sin perspective» summarized
in these words from an article
in a conservative periodical: «The New Testament blasts
homosexual activity
as the lowest, most degraded kind of immorality» (Alliance Witness, July i6, 1975).
Nor is it fair to compel a child from a home that embraces historic Christian sexual norms to attend a school
in which the teachers portray
homosexual practice or open marriage
as just one of many equally acceptable lifestyle options.
For the premises were firmly
in place: Justice Kennedy had said that people
in homosexual relations «seek autonomy» for themselves, just
as people
in heterosexual relations do.
In the shift from sin to inferiority, the Editorial Board assumes that if Cochran believes that homosexuality is sin, he must believe
homosexuals are «inferior» or «second - class citizens,»
as the editorial later claims.
There's such a tendency among Christians to lump all
homosexuals together
as a group of faceless, nameless «perverts» and to make statements not rooted
in fact.
Engaging or not engaging
in homosexual activities is viewed
as a choice, and thus the power of Christ is needed to enable the person to change or resist
homosexual temptations.
The official publication of the Christian Booksellers» Association recently carried an article on trends
in religious publishing which predicted more books on homosexuality «down the road (maybe five years or so)» and noted that just
as there has been evidence of more compassion toward divorced persons, «Christians
in the future will be saying homosexuality is still wrong but God loves
homosexuals and values them
as persons» (Bookstore Journal, January 1976).
Reparative therapy, however, should
in no way be presented
as a requirement for the
homosexual person.
«Today's opinion dismantles the structure of constitutional law that has permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and
homosexual unions, insofar
as a formal recognition
in marriage is concerned,» wrote Scalia.
Listening to our law
in our bodies It is just
as inappropriate for the
homosexual person to «do what he wants with his body.»
As Dr Mark Yarhouse, a dean of Regent college showed, those gay believing men married to a heterosexual woman, remain
homosexual in orientation.
Homosexual acts by their nature arbitrate against the procreative dimension,
as discussed
in the previous section about the sacred interplay.
These sentiments, common place
in the
homosexual rights movement, could easily have been those of slaveholders and those involved
in the slave trade, and
as such they would strike us
as ludicrous.
Cindy, I have no agenda regarding
homosexual individuals and
in roughly 1000 posts on my blog I have not even covered it once,
as far
as I can remember.
Note well that the
homosexual person,
in living chastely, is
in a most noble way doing something profoundly positive: by not misusing his sexuality he is respectfully acknowledging that ultimately our generative faculties are not ours to use
as we please; the sacred interplay is God's territory wherein we participate, not over which we arbitrate.
Wesley Hill understands that,
as a faithfully Christian
homosexual man, he is not
in the only category of people who are not called to sexual activity.
I would be happy to debate the question
as to whether
homosexual activity is
in itself inherently sinful, but this was not my statement
as you suggest.
But I also say that people who choose other lifestyles, heterosexual or
homosexual, should be accepted, just
as atheists and libertarians are accepted,
in the hope that they will come to faith
in Jesus which will presumably involve repentance.
As to what the Scriptures have to say about homosexual orientation, my brother, you not only have to do deeper research, but most importantly approach Scripture in the Spirit of Love, as a child who knows nothing, seeking the guidance of his Fathe
As to what the Scriptures have to say about
homosexual orientation, my brother, you not only have to do deeper research, but most importantly approach Scripture
in the Spirit of Love,
as a child who knows nothing, seeking the guidance of his Fathe
as a child who knows nothing, seeking the guidance of his Father.
I have a hunch that this type of book is quite rare, because its subject matter is homosexuality and the struggle involved
in «being gay»
as well
as embracing orthodox Christianity's teaching on the
homosexual orientation.
The
homosexual lobby has been very effective
in aligning itself with minority groups, is prominently represented at the Holocaust memorial service [12] each year and has created an image of itself
as a group of people under persecution.
Before and for a long time after the word
homosexual came into English (
in 1892
in a translation of Krafft - Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis), attractions and friendships, thoughts and actions, were universally classified
as ordered and disordered.
By working to get these recognised
as social evils akin to racism or sexism [2] it has been possible to get towards the goal, which is that
homosexual behaviour is firmly accepted
in society and that society should be indifferent to the form of relationships which individuals choose to enter or make the basis of their family lives.
Having established that
homosexual relationships are the same
as heterosexual relationships the next step of promoting
homosexual relationships
as equal
in providing a suitable environment to raise children logically and actually followed.