Sentences with phrase «as a married couple for»

Since you were married as of Dec. 31, 2014, and you filed as a married couple for 2014, you're good — assuming, of course, you used current tax software or IRS tax tables for married filing jointly.

Here are a few financial planning basics you should know before you file your taxes as a married couple for the very first time.

The pressure to bring forward recognition of civil partnerships was contributed to by a groundbreaking case taken by a lesbian couple's challenge to the Revenue Commissioners» refusal to recognise them as a married couple for tax purposes.

The Finance Bill will allow for civil partners to be treated the same as married couples for taxation purposes, including income tax, stamp duty, capital acquisitions tax, capital gains tax and VAT.

Each piece in this room holds a story, which have become a part of our story, as a married couple for 11 years.

Not exact matches

Salesforce defines roughly one - third of its customers as small businesses, but the software may be more than you need just now for yours — sort of the organizational equivalent of a just - married couple buying a four - bedroom house.

I was absolutely heartbroken leaving my family behind for our second Christmas as a married couple (I won going to my parents our first year!).

Something new is coming this tax season for some same - sex couples: For the first time, they will file as «married» on their federal retufor some same - sex couples: For the first time, they will file as «married» on their federal retuFor the first time, they will file as «married» on their federal return.

The estate tax, also known as the death tax, is currently a 40 percent levy on estates greater than $ 5.49 million for individual filers or about $ 11 million for married couples.

As I saw with my parents, who were happily married for 39 years, couples who tackle life's inevitable ups and downs with a true team mentality have a much better chance of going the distance.

As for couples who are saving more throughout the rest of the year, keep in mind that after falling love often comes getting married, buying a home and having a baby, which is the most expensive time in your life, von Tobel cautioned.

The child credit would be available for more wealthy households: It would start to phase out at $ 230,000 in earnings for married couples, as opposed to $ 110,000 under current law.

The child credit would be available for many more wealthy households: It would start to phase out at $ 400,000 in earnings for married couples, as opposed to $ 110,000 under current law.

Newly married couples, for example, are typically better off filing a joint tax return, but there are circumstances, such as one spouse owing back taxes or having large medical bills, when filing separately may make sense.

Open a Roth IRA (or a Traditional IRA if you make over the Roth IRA income limits, which as of this writing are $ 116,000 for an individual and $ 183,300 if you are a married couple).

But certain «service businesses» such as consulting, engineering, law, medicine and financial services companies making more than $ 75,000 a year ($ 150,000 for married couples) are excluded from taking the deduction.

Instead, they will take the standard deduction, as much as $ 24,000 in 2018 for a married couple filing together.

Specifically, individuals can make a lump - sum gift to a 529 plan of up to $ 65,000 ($ 130,000 for married couples) and avoid gift tax, provided the gift is treated as having been made in equal installments over a five - year period and no other gifts are made to that beneficiary during the five years.

If marriage is a «lifestyle» choice for heterosexual couples, as people seem to believe, why should homosexual couples not be allowed to marry?

ex couples «non-involvement in joint parenthood», «lower exposure to normative pressure about the necessity of life - long unions» as well as differing motivations for getting married.

«There are valid as well as nonvalid reasons for not permitting a couple to get married with the blessing of that local congregation of believers,» Land said.

It is a cause for wonder when you see a married couple living together in a way that is unified under Christ; just as it is a cause for sorrow when you see a couple who can not give up their own wills for each other.

«Mr Cameron», The Financial Times reported, «is being urged to accelerate tax breaks for married couples as part of his moral clean - up of Britain following last week's riots»:

Reality Check # 2: Contrary to what you may have read on Facebook, pastors and priests will not be forced to marry same - sex couples or be fined for refusing to... just as they are not presently forced to marry interfaith couples if their tradition opposes it, or cohabitating couples if their tradition opposes it, or divorcees if their tradition opposes it, or interracial couple if their tradition opposes it.

[12] They will do this because the law will give the green light for Churches to be prosecuted by homosexuals who disapprove of Christian views such as that which holds that only couples born of the opposite sex should marry each other.

As young couples «in love» know intuitively (but married couples often forget), appreciation is the language of love because it is the food for nurturing self - esteem.

Many other modern interpreters of marriage have made the same mistake, and so have many people in American churches, who are tempted to join with Coontz and insist that couples get married for reasons of love alone, Economic, kinship and network issues and even the desire to have children are sometimes seen as contaminations of the purity of marital love.

Persons of the same sex can not marry because they can not do what married couples can, i.e., consummate their union by a bodily act in which they become the common subjects of an act that, precisely as human behavior, is eminently fit both for the communication of spousal love and for the generation of new human life.

If I were a young Christian living in a USA that just did the domestic partner thing for all couples: I'd shrug, get married in church and then register my husband as my domestic partner.

I have a close male friend who is now widowed and I am wondering what would be your opinion of us as an older couple living together [not getting married] for companionship?

Of course, there are some that might marry for that same reason, just as any straight couple would.

Speaking of his views on the issue as the result of «an evolution,» Obama relayed that he had decided that it was «important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same - sex couples should be able to get married.»

Let them go, for they too need to now have the same responsibility as any other married couple, why not, we are in the end times anyway, and this was prophesied in Jeremiah 50:37, prophecy fulfilled.»

But in conclusion, he offers an escape hatch: It may be permissible for married couples to use barrier methods as long as they do so with the intent of «responsible parenthood» as that concept is defined, paradoxically, in Humanae Vitae itself.

The «minority «group that was so vehemently against this couple getting married in the church in question should be made to pay for the couple's wedding costs as a form of amends.

A society in which married couples are expected to be faithful to their marital vows «for better or worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health» is a society that assumes all people, regardless of class, can experience marriage as a «school of love»» no matter what economic hardships may confront them.

The divorce papers of Democratic lobbyist super couple Tony and Heather Podesta show that for a certain class of people government is not a public service or a field for settling partisan disagreements so much as an opportunity for self promotion: «As a married couple who both lobbied they..as an opportunity for self promotion: «As a married couple who both lobbied they..As a married couple who both lobbied they....

(One could now add, for example, the data indicating the greater incidence of violence among cohabiting, as compared to married, couples.)

The divorce papers of Democratic lobbyist super couple Tony and Heather Podesta show that for a certain class of people government is not a public service or a field for settling partisan disagreements so much as an opportunity for self promotion: «As a married couple who both lobbied they strategically cultivated their public image,» one document reads, «and worked to build the «Heather and Tony Podesta» brand for the success of their shared enterprise.&raquas an opportunity for self promotion: «As a married couple who both lobbied they strategically cultivated their public image,» one document reads, «and worked to build the «Heather and Tony Podesta» brand for the success of their shared enterprise.&raquAs a married couple who both lobbied they strategically cultivated their public image,» one document reads, «and worked to build the «Heather and Tony Podesta» brand for the success of their shared enterprise.»

In the end, the couple are married by a woman minister, very obviously not in a church, and while «a certificate on paper isn't gonna solve it all /... it's a damn good place to start,» for «We have to change us,» as the formerly bigoted mother smiles warmly and walks her son down the aisle to his groom.

If there is an inherent «right to marriage» for same - sex couples, religious groups that refuse to marry gay couples are violating their civil rights, which in turn could lead to a repeal of the churches» tax exempt status» or a complete overturn in our law and culture of the religious understanding of marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

Becky, those of us who believe that «it is for freedom that Christ has set us free» would defend the right of religious institutions to refuse to marry same - sex couples as passionately as we defend the right of same - sex couples, as equal citizens, to have their spousal committments recognized by the secular State.

In a real sense, the task facing married couples is purification of sensual appetite, so that its satisfaction is sought not mainly for concupiscent self - centeredness but as an accompaniment to the donation of self that must underlie every true conjugal union.

I remember in one of Paul's letters he speaks about sexual conduct between a married couple and I totally agree on his position which is basically that sex is in itself not a vile temptation of the flesh as some would have us believe, he actually recommends that «The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband» 1 Corinthians 7:3 adding shortly after «Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer.

As a married lower income couple we have always paid for own contraception.

And this is true for all couples, heterosexual as well as homosexual, whether the couples are married or not.

In 1965, he published his most famous book, at once classic and immediately consequential as a study in the development of doctrine: Contraception: A History of Its Treatment by the Catholic Theologians and Canonists — 533 pages of dazzling historical research, unpretentious erudition, and contextual analysis that concluded by offering reasons why the papal magisterium could and should support some forms of contraception for married couples.

Thank you for the deep, loving concern you have showed to the two of us recently as a married couple!

As a young, married couple with two small children, we were always looking for fun ways to make ends meet.

During the next few years Horatio bounced back and forth between Europe and Argentina, married an Argentine widow with a couple of children, operated a Chrysler agency in Buenos Aires with a rich playboy pal, who is known on the international nightclub circuit as Macoco, and worked for a time in the Argentine embassy in The Netherlands.