Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability
of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost
of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates
of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates
of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect
of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals
as a result
of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect
of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution
of key milestones such
as the receipt
of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third
party approvals for the consummation
of our announced acquisition
of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability
of all
parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk
of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production
of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts
of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak
of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact
of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition
of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect
of governmental laws, such
as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such
as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect
of changes
in tax law, such
as the effect
of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations
of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect
of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers,
as well
as the cost and availability
of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass
of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many
of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other
governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment
of interest on, and principal
of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness
of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact
of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition
of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco
as a result
of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks
of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions
of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign
government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
She is following a succession
of fiscally impaired, torn - mainsail
governments (Stelmach, Redford, Prentice) under a PC
party that had become nearly
as fossilized
as the resource that kept it
in power for over four decades.
Certain matters discussed
in this news release are forward - looking statements that involve a number
of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, doubts about the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern, the need to obtain additional funding, risks
in product development plans and schedules, rapid technological change, changes and delays
in product approval and introduction, customer acceptance
of new products, the impact
of competitive products and pricing, market acceptance, the lengthy sales cycle, proprietary rights
of the Company and its competitors, risk
of operations
in Israel,
government regulations, dependence on third
parties to manufacture products, general economic conditions and other risk factors detailed
in the Company's filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
But
as that occurred before the advent
of the Tea
Party, which was sparked
in large part out
of concern over the
government's profligate spending, such an effort this time around would likely run into greater resistance, particularly from rank - and - file conservative House Republicans.
The opposition Labour
Party, which requested the figures under freedom
of information, said they showed the
government's «utter failure»
in ensuring wealthy people and large corporations pay
as much tax
as they should.
Stonewall said it will lobby the UK
Government, devolved administrations, and political
parties for recognition and protection
of non-binary people
in law,
as well
as appropriate ways to record gender
in all official documents.
Yanis Varoufakis: Isn't it astonishing that after Jeremy Corbyn was being described
as «the longest suicide note by the Labour
Party» about a year ago, today there is an air
of inevitability
in a Corbyn - led
government.
«For more than four years, the
government of Ecuador has offered to cooperate
in facilitating the questioning
of Julian Assange
in the Ecuadorian embassy
in London,
as well
as proposing other political and legal measures,
in order to reach a satisfactory solution for all
parties involved
in the legal case against Julian Assange, to end the unnecessary delays
in the process and to ensure full and effective legal protection, Ecuador said
in a statement, Press Association reported.
Entrepreneurs
in the field say that focusing on the price
of Bitcoin is missing the point — its value is
as proof
of concept for a new kind
of payment system not reliant on third
parties like
governments, big banks or credit - card companies.
party despite having served
as minister
of the economy
in the socialist
government between 2014 and 2016, made headlines for reasons other than his political acumen.
What began
as a small, focused Enbridge campaign with northern First Nations grew into a political juggernaut that arguably contributed to the Harper
government's 2015 defeat, after the pro-tanker Conservative
party lost more votes
in B.C. than
in the rest
of the country combined.
Indeed,
as part
of the 2015 election, all political
parties should be asked how they view the role
of the federal
government in the economy; what size
of government (i.e. debt ratio) are they looking for; and how would they achieve it?
Instead
of running ads, they would define Scheer more slowly, over time, with a series
of forced choices
in Parliament, through
government motions, much
as opposition
parties usually seek to define
governments (you'll note that «define»
in Ottawa politics is almost always pejorative by implication) through clever use
of their occasional opportunity to define a day's parliamentary debate through so - called «supply motions.»
Government action to influence the price
of goods might strike Canadians
as out
of place
in the Conservative playbook but Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Tories are acutely concerned about dispelling the notion they're the
party of «big business»
as they target middle - class voters.
As part
of its 2006 election platform, the Conservative
Party promised to «create an Independent Budget Authority to provide objective analysis directly to Parliament about the state
of the nation's finances and trends
in the national economy; require
government departments and agencies to provide timely information to the Parliamentary Budget Authority to ensure it has the information it needs to provide accurate analyses to Parliament; and ensure that
government fiscal forecasts are updated quarterly and that they provide complete data for both revenue and spending forecasts».
It may be a fine Canadian tradition
in our perpetual political cycle for opposition
parties to promise transparency and openness
as they attack a tired
government which has tossed both overboard, only to come to power and be accused
of the same.
BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers
of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third
parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to
government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third -
party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third -
party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities
in BlackBerry's products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice
of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment
of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks
as a result
of actions
of activist shareholders;
government regulation
of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties
in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry, and the company's previously disclosed review
of strategic alternatives.
WBENC is a leader
in women's business development and the nation's premier third -
party certifier
of WBEs
as suppliers to corporations and
government entities.
But
as NISA's website notes, Australia's
government is
in caretaker mode pending the outcome
of the July 2 federal election,
in which a Liberal / National coalition led by Turnbull faces the Labor
party led by Bill Shorten.
Many factors could cause BlackBerry's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward - looking statements, including, without limitation: BlackBerry's ability to enhance its current products and services, or develop new products and services
in a timely manner or at competitive prices, including risks related to new product introductions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to mitigate the impact
of the anticipated decline
in BlackBerry's infrastructure access fees on its consolidated revenue by developing an integrated services and software offering; intense competition, rapid change and significant strategic alliances within BlackBerry's industry; BlackBerry's reliance on carrier partners and distributors; risks associated with BlackBerry's foreign operations, including risks related to recent political and economic developments
in Venezuela and the impact
of foreign currency restrictions; risks relating to network disruptions and other business interruptions, including costs, potential liabilities, lost revenues and reputational damage associated with service interruptions; risks related to BlackBerry's ability to implement and to realize the anticipated benefits
of its CORE program; BlackBerry's ability to maintain or increase its cash balance; security risks; BlackBerry's ability to attract and retain key personnel; risks related to intellectual property rights; BlackBerry's ability to expand and manage BlackBerry ® World ™; risks related to the collection, storage, transmission, use and disclosure
of confidential and personal information; BlackBerry's ability to manage inventory and asset risk; BlackBerry's reliance on suppliers
of functional components for its products and risks relating to its supply chain; BlackBerry's ability to obtain rights to use software or components supplied by third
parties; BlackBerry's ability to successfully maintain and enhance its brand; risks related to
government regulations, including regulations relating to encryption technology; BlackBerry's ability to continue to adapt to recent board and management changes and headcount reductions; reliance on strategic alliances with third -
party network infrastructure developers, software platform vendors and service platform vendors; BlackBerry's reliance on third -
party manufacturers; potential defects and vulnerabilities
in BlackBerry's products; risks related to litigation, including litigation claims arising from BlackBerry's practice
of providing forward - looking guidance; potential charges relating to the impairment
of intangible assets recorded on BlackBerry's balance sheet; risks
as a result
of actions
of activist shareholders;
government regulation
of wireless spectrum and radio frequencies; risks related to economic and geopolitical conditions; risks associated with acquisitions; foreign exchange risks; and difficulties
in forecasting BlackBerry's financial results given the rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, intense competition and short product life cycles that characterize the wireless communications industry.
India Newsmakers Arun Jaitley, a corporate lawyer by training, has emerged
as the rising star
of the ruling Bharatiya Janata
Party and chief troubleshooter
in the new
government, headed by prime minister Narendra Modi.
«
As the leader
of the Liberal
Party noted, it was in fact this party, this government, that established the parliamentary budget office,» the Prime Minister congratulated himself, «so this government is more than familiar with its intention in terms of the mandate it set up.&r
Party noted, it was
in fact this
party, this government, that established the parliamentary budget office,» the Prime Minister congratulated himself, «so this government is more than familiar with its intention in terms of the mandate it set up.&r
party, this
government, that established the parliamentary budget office,» the Prime Minister congratulated himself, «so this
government is more than familiar with its intention
in terms
of the mandate it set up.»
The NDP folks are nice and will do a good job
in government; they will actually work rather than loll around
in the house
of corruption avoiding the questions
of the opposition
parties as I noted when I went to the legislature to present my banned self to my MLA — Mr. Mandel.
The U.S.
government parties did not pay any losses under the agreement and will keep $ 5.2 billion
of $ 7 billion
in trust preferred securities
as well
as warrants for common shares that were issued by Citigroup
as consideration for such guarantee.
We must do something to change it
as soon
as possible and I am doing my part by stepping up to the plate to run
as a United Conservative
Party candidate, under the strong leadership
of Jason Kenney, to defeat the NDP
government in 2019 and to put Alberta's economy back on track!
So, Mr. Kenney, who just this week was appointed to the parliamentary committee studying electoral reform, could be abandoning plans to replace Rona Ambrose
as leader
of the Conservative
Party of Canada and setting his sights on uniting - the - right and challenging Rachel Notley «s moderate New Democratic
Party government in 2019.
As Mr. Prentice tries to scare conservatives into re-electing his
party to a 13th term
in government, one poll conducted by ThinkHQ shows most Albertans surveyed said they were more afraid
of a re-elected PC
government than a Wildrose or NDP
government.
PACs have become a big issue
in Alberta politics since 2015, when the New Democratic
Party government banned corporate and union donations to political
parties as their first piece
of legislation.
The NDP have put forward the most comprehensive plan to fight Climate Change that Alberta has ever seen, something that the Progressive Conservatives were unable to do
in the final decade
of their 44 years
in government and the Wildrose
Party has been unable to do
in its four years
as official opposition.
They define divided
government (
in the U.S.)
as one
party holding the Presidency while the other controls one or both houses
of Congress.
It means self -
government of a given body
of people,
as contrasted with non-democratic political systems
in which rule is
in the hands
of a hereditary monarch,
of a dictator,
of an aristocracy (noblemen or intellectuals),
of a class (rich people, the proletariat, or priests), or
of a limited
party.
This whiggish outlook — that
government has responsibility for the morality
of its youth because morality is necessarily reflected
in behavior — was not (and is not) just a partisan difference, although then (
as now) the viewpoint was stronger
in one political
party.
When the constitution
of 1917 was drafted, therefore, «Catholic» representation was nonexistent, and the resulting document not only repeated earlier material restrictions on the Church (such
as government ownership
of all church property, civil registry
of priests, and making marriage a civil matter) but also got
in a symbolic lick or two (for example, religious garb was not to be worn
in public; worship was to be only an indoor affair; alien priests were forbidden; and no religious labels were allowed for political
parties).
n 1797, the United States Senate ratified a treaty with Tripoli that stated
in Article 11:
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
As the
Government of the United States
of America is not,
in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as it has
in itself no character
of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility,
of Mussulmen; and,
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as the said States never entered into any war, or act
of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption
of the harmony existing between the two countries.
Powerful well - funded agencies, often promoted by the State (I avoid the word «
Government»
as I do not want to speak
in party - political terms), are mounting a relentless onslaught upon the family and especially the moral sense
of our young people.
U.S.
government leaders and an «objective» press described the Sandinistas
in Nicaragua
as «communist,» «Marxist,» «Marxist / Leninist,» «totalitarian,» «Cuban - backed,» or «Soviet - backed» so often that few U.S. citizens knew that Sweden was giving more aid to Nicaragua per capita than to any other country or that while Nicaragua does have both a Communist
party and a Marxist - Leninist
party these two
parties together received less than 3 percent
of the vote and are distinct from and hostile to the Sandinista
party.
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, — as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen, — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
As the
Government of the United States
of America is not,
in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, —
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen, — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as it has
in itself no character
of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility,
of Mussulmen, — and
as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as the said States never entered into any war or act
of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption
of the harmony existing between the two countries.
«
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
As the
Government of the United States
of America is not,
in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as it has
in itself no character
of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity,
of Mussulmen; and,
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as the said States never entered into any war, or act
of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption
of the harmony existing between the two countries.»
In the recent book, Civil Liberties Under Attack, one
of the authors mentions the case
of a
government official with an impeccable record who was placed under charges because unidentified informers asserted he «advocated the Communist
Party line, such
as favoring peace and civil liberties,» and «his convictions concerning equal rights for all races and classes extend slightly beyond the normal feelings
of the average individual «1
Douthat and Salam's youth» they're among the brightest lights
in the next generation
of conservative writers» gives them a new perspective on the contemporary political scene, allowing them to step out beyond traditional conservative fixations on tax cutting and limited
government» where the supposed Reagan solution is always the correct solution» and to offer incisive criticisms
of how the Grand Old
Party's ideology frequently serves
as a blinder to effective policies for the working class.
«
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, — as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims], — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
As the
Government of the United States
of America is not,
in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, —
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims], — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as it has
in itself no character
of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility,
of Mussulmen [Muslims], — and
as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as the said States never entered into any war or act
of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the
parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption
of the harmony existing between the two countries.»
But it's truer still to characterize them
as the
party of those blacks who see the answer to everything
in government.
To attack the President
of the country at a time when the USA needs to close ranks and stand together to consolidate the enormous strides his intelligent and respectful approach has achieved
in building bridges, when her
party's period
in government bombed them, Sarah Palin comes across
as a pitifully inadequate anachronism from the times
of the Far West.
«
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
As the
Government of the United States
of America is not,
in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as it has
in itself no character
of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility,
of Mussulmen; and,
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as the said States never entered into any war, or act
of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption
of the harmony existing between the two countries.»
I do not forget the position assumed by some that constitutional questions are to be decided by the Supreme Court, nor do I deny that such decisions must be binding
in any case upon the
parties to a suit
as to the object
of that suit, while they are also entitled to very high respect and consideration
in all parallel cases by other departments
of the
government.
We may use and / or disclose your Personally Identifiable Information for the following reasons: to contact you
in response to your inquiries, comments and suggestions; to contact you otherwise when necessary; for the specific purpose for which it was volunteered; to track our visitors» use
of the site for internal market research; to improve the site and the services Phoenix Media Corporation promotes or provides through the site; to customize the content and / or layout
of our site for each individual visitor; to ask for your participation
in brief surveys; to complete any purchases or other transactions you may perform on the site; to notify visitors about updates to the sites or services; to notify you about promotions, special offers, etc. regarding products and services provided by Phoenix Media Corporation or its affiliates or partners; to be provided to Phoenix Media Corporation affiliates or third
parties in connection with the legitimate business purposes
of Phoenix Media Corporation or the site; to be provided to third
parties for the legitimate business purposes
of those third
parties; to generate aggregate statistical studies;
as required by law or regulation, or
as requested by
government authorities, or for the protection
of persons or property; and
in connection with an acquisition, merger, restructuring, sale or other transfer involving all or any portion
of the business associated with the site; and for other business purposes.
If the food security budget were to double by 2016, and the aid program increased to 50 cents
in every 100 dollars
of government income
as both major
parties had committed to do, food security would be around 11 %
of the aid budget.
«It may not go down well
in international diplomacy... but
in the Labour
party it will be welcomed
as a rare flash
of honesty from a senior member
of the
government,» Peter Kilfoyle said.
The President and
party seem to have grown thick skins to constructive criticism; otherwise, no sane
government,
in spite
of the open condemnation that it has received from Ghanaians over its shielding
of criminals
in the administration, will repeat another one
as done
in the case
of the $ 2.5 digital address system.
In a heated summer
of violence between the Kurdish Workers»
Party (PKK) and the
government, the «peace process» collapsed
as the PKK accused the
government of supporting ISIS.