If the author is already peddling denialism based on limited facts used out of context, and this new paper is published likely just to be used
as the latest
red herring distraction in the global warming argument by examining «Svalbard and Greenland temperature records» in a too limited time span without relevant context, which, just in case some may not have noticed does not represent the region known
as planet Earth, uses too short a time span in relation to mechanism outside of the examined region because it is in fact a regional analysis; one is left with a reasonable conclusion that the paper is designed to be precisely what I suspect it is designed for, to be a
red herring distraction in the argument between science and science denialism regarding global warming.