Scientists anticipate sea level rise of one meter or more
as a result of climate change within this century.
Not exact matches
To get a sense for how this probability, or risk
of such a storm, will
change in the future, he performed the same analysis, this time embedding the hurricane model
within six global
climate models, and running each model from the years 2081 to 2100, under a future scenario in which the world's
climate changes as a
result of unmitigated growth
of greenhouse gas emissions.
His position: • No evidence
of increasing lake clarity
as a
result of secchi measurements since 1946 • The interplay
of stratification and plankton productivity are not «straightforward» • Challenges O'Reilly's assumption on the correlation
of wind and productivity - the highest production is on the end
of the lake with the lowest winds • A strong caution using diatoms
as the productivity proxy (it is one
of two different lake modes) • No ability to link
climate change to productivity
changes • More productivity from river than allowed for in Nature Geopscience article • Externally derived nutrients control productivity for a quarter
of the year • Strong indications
of overfishing • No evidence
of a
climate and fishery production link • The current productivity
of the lake is
within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially
changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims
of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that
changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea
of declining productivity.
The empirical evidence continues to build
within the
climate science community that the world is experiencing some type
of global cooling phase
as a
result of natural
climate change forces.
Coral reefs, which plausibly
as a
result of climate change could disappear entirely by 2100 and almost certainly will be reduced much in areal extent
within the next few decades (Hoegh - Guldberg, 1999; Mumby et al., 2007; Pandolfi et al., 2011; Ricke et al., 2013), are essentially the «rainforests
of the sea» (Knowlton and Jackson, 2008) in terms
of biodiversity.
Most
of the science is flipped through fairly quickly
within chapter one, and casual readers familiar with the IPCC report will find little to surprise them with sections including statements such
as «An overwhelming body
of scientific evidence indicates that the Earth's
climate is rapidly
changing, predominantly
as a
result of increases in greenhouse gases caused by human activities» etc..
For example, studies
of displacement
within Bangladesh and to neighbouring India have drawn obvious links to increased flood hazard
as a
result of climate change.
These working environments are all subject to
change whether it comes from
within the business or
as a
result of a
change in the law or economic
climate for example.