There are contexts in which the statement would be true: what will happen to the polar ice caps, crop land, deserts, etc.,
as a result of global warming over time.
Not exact matches
«Our
results indicate that a wide range
of POPs have been remobilized into the Arctic atmosphere
over the past two decades
as a
result of climate change, confirming that Arctic
warming could undermine
global efforts to reduce environmental and human exposure to these toxic chemicals,» write the scientists, whose analysis was published yesterday in the journal Nature Climate Change.
But in the debate
over a response to
global warming, there were blinders on a lot
of Democrats,
as well — blinders that
resulted for far too long in a one - solution focus on a comprehensive, and doomed, cap - and - trade climate bill.
Using the same method that I had used earlier for the same years on both data sets, I compared the total numbers
of sunspots in post-1975 years to the 200 years pre-1975, and discovered a surprising
result, given all the hype: the GSN reconstruction makes no discernable difference
over the SIDC number post-1975
as pertaining to the solar cause
of global warming.
If one looks
over the past half century one would expect to find that,
as a
result of the clearly measured increase in atmospheric CO2, the
Global Temperature is
warming.
Long story short, the polar vortex is the
result of global warming changing the semi-permanent weather system
over the arctic regions
resulting in movement
of cold air masses from the arctic region to parts
of North America, such
as Canada and, unfortunately, poor Buffalo.
This is in direct opposition to the IPCC's contention that
global warming is accelerating, and supports arguments that the amount
of warming that will occur
over the remainder
of the 21st century
as a
result of human fossil fuel usage will be at the low end
of the IPCC projections, or even lower.
Kilimanjaro's majestic glacial cap
of 11,000 - year - old ice has long captured imaginations the world
over, so it was not surprising that environmentalists focused their attention on it when scientists reported in 2001 that glaciers around the world were retreating, partly
as a
result of global warming caused by emissions
of heat - trapping «greenhouse» gases from smokestacks and tailpipes.
(Revised September 23, 2016 by addition
of a new final section by Dr. James Wallace)
As discussed in my book, Environmentalism Gone Mad, two
of the reasonable inferences from the Catastrophic Anthropogenic
Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis (the scientific basis for the world climate scare pushed by the United Nations and the Obama Administration) are that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels should affect global temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the tr
Global Warming (CAGW) hypothesis (the scientific basis for the world climate scare pushed by the United Nations and the Obama Administration) are that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels should affect
global temperatures, and that the resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km over the tr
global temperatures, and that the
resulting heat generated should be observable by a hot spot about 10 km
over the tropics.
Over this period the mean CR intensity appears to have fallen by less than 0.6 % using the data
of Bazilevskaya et al. (2008)... the increase in temperature predicted [
as a
result] is 0.002 C, a value that is quite negligible to the
Global Warming in this period...
As Muller notes, the original BEST
results confirmed the accuracy
of the surface temperture record, finding 0.87 °C
global surface
warming over land during the past 50 years (Figure 1).
«My interaction (
over the years) with a broad segment
of AMS members (that I have met
as a
result of my seasonal hurricane forecasting and other activities) who have spent a sizable portion
of their careers down in the meteorological trenches
of observations and forecasting, have indicated that a majority
of them do not agree that humans are the primary cause
of global warming.
«This is in direct opposition to the IPCC's contention that
global warming is accelerating, and supports arguments that the amount
of warming that will occur
over the remainder
of the 21st century
as a
result of human fossil fuel usage will be at the low end
of the IPCC projections, or even lower,» the two scientists added.
As a
result of stronger winds caused by
global warming, seeds and pollen are being carried
over longer distances.
With the slowly increasing SSTs
as a
result of global warming, greater numbers
of tropical depressions will likely form, which,
over warm water may mature into tropical storms, which
over even
warmer water may strengthen to tropical cyclones.
(1) Because
of a growing concern
over the possible consequences
of global warming, which may be caused in part by increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide (a major greenhouse gas), and also because
of the need for accurate estimates
of carbon dioxide emissions, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) has developed factors for estimating the amount
of carbon dioxide emitted
as a
result of U.S. coal consumption.
Cook et al. (2013) found the same 97 %
result through a survey
of over 12,000 climate abstracts from peer - reviewed journals,
as well
as from
over 2,000 scientist author self - ratings, among abstracts and papers taking a position on the causes
of global warming.