Sentences with phrase «as a striker who»

Ahh as long as it's Arsenal coached by Wenger expect anything, He can decide to use Cech as a Striker who knows..

And 24 - year - old Hooper is under consideration following his failure to commit to a new contract at Celtic, joining Seville's Alvaro Negredo and Brazilian Leandro Damiao as strikers who could head to north London in the transfer window.

I don't hide my feelings for Giroud, I'm not particularly fond of him as ive said time and time again you cant be the difference maker for a title winning side when you have the same goal record as a striker who's side; firstly is worse off in terms of quality and secondly is constantly fighting a relegation battle (Benteke) 42 Goals in 82 appearances the same as Giroud.

Mbappe is a risk whot taking, he has what it take as a striker who could excel in Premier league even though he is not a proven striker but the risk is whot taking

Looking back at one player in particular who played for United, Hernandez was picked out by the Portuguese tactician as the striker who would thrive in the current team.

Many will remember Jimenez as the substitute that manages to get important goals at the end of the season, but not as a striker who won over a starting role and scored many important goals for the club.

With the Dutchman installed in the side as a striker who could play the role of finisher and creator, the plan for how to use the Japan international went out of the window — two seasons later he returned to Dortmund, ending the whole bemusing chapter.

Not exact matches

Generally speaking, people who see themselves as strikers tend to enjoy prominent, public roles.

Hopefully the super-agent will not be put off by potentially having two of his youngsters who play as a striker challenging each other as they look to break into the first - team, otherwise Malen could potentially be a blocker for us.

But there are many devastating strikers around the world who are also weak on defense and they are NEVER faulted for it so long as they score.]

The Real Madrid striker has apparently emerged as an»em ergency» option for City after they missed out on the signing of Alexis Sanchez, who instead joined Manchester United in January.

He had problems to adapt to Wenger mediocre gameplay and little ambition... He showed his best during the first half of the season as Central Striker untill guess who changed him back to the wing... yes «Marvellous knows it all» Arsene Weneger.

As for Giroud I hope what I'm hearing is not true.You get the feeling that once Lacazette starts scoring he just won't like it.He's also another overrated player who's also hear because of Wenger's kindness.Apart from the fact that he's good with his head I don't see the positives of keeping here and even Welbeck.We need players who can push Lacazette to perform and these are just not the players.They are more of rotation players.Do you think if Welbeck and Giroud were at top form they can challenge Laca at his best?I always laugh at our strikers though.On one hand, one doesn't fit our style of play but at least he can finish.On the other hand, the one who fits our style of play can't even score a goal.I can't believe we are joking with such a crucial role.I'm sick and tired of seeing average strikers in the club.It's been painful watching the likes of Bendtner and Chamakh already.Now I have to cope with this.

Its seems to me that both the club and it's fans are not serious.Anytime Arsenal sign a youngster from another team who is dubbed the next whatever people come out and say Arsenal have just signed a youngster who may or may not make it and that Arsene should sign ready made.They say it to seem as if it's a bad thing.Now that Chris Willock is leaving I'm anticipating that a lot of people are soon going to be blaming the same Wenger who actually likes bringing in youngsters.Anyway you have to look at the reasons he lfet.It's for game time and to him he thinks its a good choice.The bright side is that he's not Arsenal's most talented player.The likes of Donyell Malen, Yassin Fortune, Reiss Nelson in my eyes have more potential as wingers.I also think Arsenal should be very excited about Eddie Nketiah and Stephy Mavididi.They can be world class strikers in the future particularly Eddie.

Wenger got a Japanese striker and we still have Sanogo, Giroud, Walcott (lost soul and useless as we know), Wellbeck (coming back one day) and Akpom (who is systematically loaned every season because he clearly does not have the level)... That is the answer «the deluded one» will automatically give you... And he is right... That is a lot of strikers even though none or most of them can not find the path to the goal

Nothing you could ever do to Giroud would ever make him come good just nothing.Its not a formation set up that gets a player to dribble, score, be world class, be dependable, wow the crowd and the like.Its the players» own ability that makes him do that.Once you don't have it ya ain't gat it brother.Read my lips!!!!! Once ya don't have it ya ain't gat it.As simple as ABC.So I expect this to be another de ja vu case and waste of time if Giroud and Alexis are paired.I'm even shocked it's coming from Henry.He should rather be giving us more reasons why we need a new striker and why we would fail if we don't get the new striker.Forget Giroud's stats for a moment and judge him by how he plays when you are watching him.You would realize that given the same chances at Arsenal strikers who are not even world class can do better.I want a new striker even if not world class and to be honest its not necessarily a world class striker that wins you a league but just increases the chances of winning it.Peace!!!!

Just a few days ago it was being reported that Arsenal were set to hold transfer talks next week with the Inter Milan and Argentina striker Mauro Icardi, as a possible alternative to his fellow countryman Gonzalo Higuain who seems to have been priced out of a move to the Gunners with the ridiculously high valuation by his Serie A club Napoli.

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

End of Transfer window: We could not find a stiker in this transfer window, so we have been working hard with Theo and Sanogo who will play as the main striker this season.

Higuain has been so good for Napoli in recent years that he is now in front of Sergio Aguero, who only started one of five games at the Copa America, in the Argentina pecking order and the Man City striker is widely regarded as one of, if not the very, best forwards in the Premier League.

Chelsea definitely need a striker who can play as a traditional number - 9 but not be as slow as Giroud.

Note that today, he played alongside a world class striker (Lewandowski) who couldn't even do anything of note as well

We can only wait and see, but according to a source who seems to find some inside information (Pablo) who I mentioned in a previous post, he does state that Wenger is closing in on a Striker deal which he describes as being madness!?

Bec he is the one who insist in keeping him for 3 straight years as our main striker.

And not only that he does that, but he uses Welbeck, a guy who fails to score a goal even if it's just him and the goal, as the main striker, even though he has Giroud on the bench, a guy who scored a goal in the first game.

If Walcott starts the Liverpool game as the striker, then Ramsey will start at right wing because Jack Wilshere who is better at right wing than Ramsey is, will not be available for this match.

as a striker i would rather use Akpom who is familiar with the team then buy someone not proven second rate and spend Arsens money sorry Arsenals money

and we were so close to having Yaya Sanogo as our striker for the first few months instead of Welbeck, who is decent, but was a panic buy as well.

If you leave it with these AKBs, we don't much!!!! as a matter fact we don't need striker, we don't need CB, or maybe we don't need a team!!!! as long as we have a manager getting paid 8 Mil, and an owner, who likes to go to bank everyday, we don't anybody.

It is not that easy when you got constraint of the transfer budget (reported to be around 96M including agent fee, bonus and first year wage) Base on rumours early in the transfer market, here are who we after — Xhaka (35M)-- Vardy (20M)-- Ricardo Rodriguez (25M)-- An experienced CB (20M) Vardy rejection practically spoil our transfer plan on LB and CB as we prioritise a Striker first.

Or even other strikers, liike Bony, Benteke, Lacazette, whom are not on the same level as Cavani thats obvious but who are good enough to play for us.

The 20 - year - old — who has featured everywhere from left - back to attacking midfield and can also feature as a striker — scored 17 times on loan at Vitesse Arnhem in the 2014 - 15 campaign.

He can score 30 goals a season but still i don't think that we can win league with him... When he scores only he scores, but Arsenal as a team doesn't look dangerous, I really prefer a dynamic kind striker like welback, Who can make runs from behind the Strstriker like welback, Who can make runs from behind the StrikerStriker...

Let's face it: Wenger has brought in Sanchez for his versatility; And, in Walcott and Podolski, Wenger has two players who can be used as strikers.

Everyone n football and most of the same fans know Sanchez is our only player of quality, Henry said he is the only player who would get into the Spurs squad, and we play him with one hand tied behind his back on the left wing with effectively no existing central striker to worry defenders (unless you count Giroud as a central striker but I refuse to believe Giroud worries any central defender).

And we have had a boost for the following game as well, at home to West Ham who have also lost their main striker as Andy Carroll picked up an injury last night that will see him out for at least a month.

We need better though but I'm in full 100 % support of the purchase of Shkrodan Mustafi and Lucas Perez.Mustafi can help Koscielny now.I've been saying it here time and time again that it's not a world clsss striker we have needed but a clinical finisher which we have lacked for several seasons and counting.Hopefully this guy puts Giroud where he belongs which is on the bench.Though a world class striker is good what we have lacked is someone who puts the game to bed in clinical fashion but Arsene Wenger has listened to many people to the extent that if he can't get a world class striker then he can get anyone.If Arsenal had a clinical finisher for some five seasons or so we coulda won the EPL then.Giroud has cost us matches and will continue to cost us matches.Giroud is half decent as someone said here the last time.I expect Perez to be much better if he can take on his man and be clinical in front of goal.

What about Ramsey who think of himself as a striker and always chasing glory.

Meanwhile, Inter are expected to sign Boca Juniors striker Jonathan Calleri as a replacement, as noted by Corriere dello Sport, but it still seems a risky move for the Serie A leaders who have seemingly found a good balance so far this season.

nah giroud is as good mandzukic acc to some fans here both score against city by that logic bendtner who scored against Bayern is indeed the greatest striker in the world

Giroud plays week in week out and gets a lot of flack as he's gone 8 games without a goal, yet theo who can be totally anonymous in games, then gets a little fortunate with every shot going in and scores a hat trick is suddenly a top quality striker?

This is exactly the type of versatile player that Arsenal need right now, as he can play as a winger or a striker, and anyone who can score 8 La Liga goals in 10 games (while not playing for Madrid or Barcelona) is definitely worth taking a chance on, especially for a price that works out at just over 14m GBP without any haggling.

Roy Hodgson has called up Manchester United forward Jesse Lingard as a replacement for injured striker Jamie Vardy, who may soon be joining the new boy at Old Trafford.

Lets move on as a team and hopefully this all will be forgotten after getting 3 points from Palace and us signing top striker and DM who could lift up the whole club.

Giroud has a better scoring record than Morata so he's definitely not the striker we need and is not in the same category as Lewandowski or Higuan who are 30 goals a season strikers!

@john0711 it's people like you I don't get.Do you know Chamakh may have been a worse player than Giroud but let's be honest Chamakh was a better finisher than Giroud.Even him was labelled as garbage.Can someone name a striker with exception of Gervinho (man he was awfully out of this world) who played for Araenal who Giroud had better finishing than.Giroud is to me part of Arsenal's worst finishers ever and please let's not deny it and note I considered only «finishing»..

He would probably cost about the same as Lukaku who is a proven Premier league striker with an excellent record even when his club are struggling!

The only regret is we have lost a good chant for a striker who was / is never prolific and went through too many barren spells with his goal scoring.While the Chavs put more and better crosses into the box (yes take note Bellerin) Giroud has no pace to get on the end of most of them.No great loss as far as I'm concerned and good money for a bench player at best

His admission may prove disappointing to hear for Robert Lewandowski, who despite scoring fourteen goals in the league, has been considered something of a flop since his move from Jurgen Klopp's team, even more so as it was the Polish striker that got the winner against his former club.

Cavani is the tipe of striker who doesn't help very mutch at creation proces, is as Giroud with some pace as one Gunner colege said.