In it we evaluate 1,000 stocks for their
appeal as value investments and growth investments, using the same methodology as our annual Top 500 ranking.
I guess I think about stock risk
largely as the value investment community does as the possibility of permanent impairment of capital, not really what overall general business and economic conditions are (rail traffic, ECRI, ISM, etc.).
Each stock is then graded for its merit
as a value investment.
First we size up its merit
as a value investment, then its attractiveness as a growth investment.
First we consider a stock's merit
as a value investment and then we determine its appeal as a growth investment.
It evaluates 1,000 stocks for their appeal
as value investments and growth investments, using the same methodology as the annual Top 500 ranking.
First we consider its attractiveness
as a value investment and then we determine its appeal as a growth investment.
Just as we do for the Top 200 Canadian stocks, each U.S. stock is sized up for its appeal
as a value investment and as a growth investment.